Why I keep urging all to abandon browser add-ons

For discussions about security.
Post Reply
Message
Author
belham2
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon 15 Aug 2016, 22:47

Why I keep urging all to abandon browser add-ons

#1 Post by belham2 »

...add ons, for the most part, are simply no longer worth it, and worse, they can cause users a huge headache because the add-ons have been doing what this article describes above for a long time now.

http://www.ghacks.net/2016/11/01/browsing-history-sold/

User avatar
perdido
Posts: 1528
Joined: Mon 09 Dec 2013, 16:29
Location: ¿Altair IV , Just north of Eeyore Junction.?

#2 Post by perdido »

You can have my noscript and https everywhere "when you pry them from my cold, dead hands" 8)

.

User avatar
Moat
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 16 Jul 2013, 06:04
Location: Mid-mitten

#3 Post by Moat »

For me, the addons (in Firefox) are what make the browser, and are invaluable. To me. Third parties can have at my browsing history all they want - I personally could care less about something so trivial. :wink:

Bob

slavvo67
Posts: 1610
Joined: Sat 13 Oct 2012, 02:07
Location: The other Mr. 305

#4 Post by slavvo67 »

This is, of course, concerning but I gather it's data already sold and resold by companies like Google, Yahoo, MS and ISP's like Comcast, for example.

Nothing surprises me, anymore.

s243a
Posts: 2580
Joined: Tue 02 Sep 2014, 04:48
Contact:

#5 Post by s243a »

perdido wrote:You can have my noscript and https everywhere "when you pry them from my cold, dead hands" 8)

.
I tried noscript on facebook the otherday with palemoon. I had the problem where the same page kept getting reloaded. It seems that noscript doesn't block enough of the bad javascript behavior. I suppose the problem comes with a script from a trusted cite tries to load a script from an untrusted sight. Perhaps I need a stop button for the browser which will stop all javascript activity for the page.

User avatar
perdido
Posts: 1528
Joined: Mon 09 Dec 2013, 16:29
Location: ¿Altair IV , Just north of Eeyore Junction.?

#6 Post by perdido »

My strategy is to block all the barbarians at the gate.

I just have noscript set to block everything, after I load a page I unblock just the page and not all the associated java scripting. A lot of pages require you to load a few more, like cloudfront.net and googleapis to make them useable. I only allow google once in a while, their search works without jave script. I don't use google maps, just openstreetmaps.

One trick that works fairly well when a page is requiring java script to view text or images is to change the browser View>Page Style setting to No Style.

Can't suggest on Face Book, don't use those but I read they are very invasive.

I am using Pale Moon with a side order of Sea Monkey as a double-checker.

.

bark_bark_bark
Posts: 1885
Joined: Tue 05 Jun 2012, 12:17
Location: Wisconsin USA

#7 Post by bark_bark_bark »

I can't live without the extensions I use; they are essential for security and privacy. Also this whole thing with "Web of Trust" is old news. I recommend though sticking to extensions that are open source.
....

User avatar
souleau
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2016, 15:24

#8 Post by souleau »

perdido wrote:My strategy is to block all the barbarians at the gate.

I just have noscript set to block everything, after I load a page I unblock just the page and not all the associated java scripting.
This is exactly how I've been browsing, NoScript with an almost empty whitelist, giving temporary permission to only that which makes the sites functional, and only if I believe it's worth it.

Someone gave me a cheapo android tablet a week or so ago, went online with it and got vomitted over by waves of ads.

NoScript is what makes my online experience barable.

User avatar
8Geee
Posts: 2181
Joined: Mon 12 May 2008, 11:29
Location: N.E. USA

#9 Post by 8Geee »

ya know firefox (et al) have this configuration utility built in. With it you can search for the term history, and tell FF not to remember anything. But then again, one does have to escape the default zone of death.

This on the other hand is why I don't update
http://www.ghacks.net/2016/12/05/beware ... eferences/

8Geee
Linux user #498913 "Some people need to reimagine their thinking."
"Zuckerberg: a large city inhabited by mentally challenged people."

Post Reply