Best Puppy for a P3 laptop?

Booting, installing, newbie
Post Reply
Message
Author
Zup
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun 21 Aug 2016, 18:06

Best Puppy for a P3 laptop?

#1 Post by Zup »

Hi, I have an old Toshiba laptop with a Pentium III @ 650 and 256 Mb of RAM.

I've loaded Windows 98SE and I was thinking that Puppy Linux would be a good second OS, but I think that later versions (5.x, 6.x) can be heavy, so I'd like to use a lighter version.

What version would you recommend? The graphic card is a S3 Savage/IX and the soundcard is a Yamaha 744, so maybe video support can be an issue.

Thanks in advance.

Robert123
Posts: 362
Joined: Fri 20 May 2016, 05:22
Location: Pacific

#2 Post by Robert123 »

Devuan Linux, Stardust 013 (4.31) updated [url]https://archive.org/details/Stardustpup013glibc2.10[/url]
s57(2018)barebone[url]https://sourceforge.net/projects/puppy-linux-minimal-builds/files/s57%282018%29barebones.iso/download[/url]

User avatar
ally
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sat 19 May 2012, 19:29
Location: lincoln, uk
Contact:

#3 Post by ally »

you may find some good info here:

http://puppylinux.org/wikka/PuppyOnLaptops

puppy 4.31 was a gem, try that first, it runs great on my p3 thinkpad

http://archive.org/download/Puppy_Linux ... up_431.iso

darry does an updated version

http://archive.org/download/Puppy_Linux ... te2016.iso

slacko 5.3.3 ran lovely on my machine also

http://archive.org/download/Puppy_Linux ... g-SCSI.iso

:)

Sailor Enceladus
Posts: 1543
Joined: Mon 22 Feb 2016, 19:43

#4 Post by Sailor Enceladus »

For what it's worth, I have gotten almost all windows programs that worked in Windows 98 to work in Wine with Puppy. At a point I kept Win98 around because a few crashed in Wine, but I found out that changing winecfg settings in "Graphics" to "Enable virtual desktop" fixed them. Does your Windows 98 laptop have soundblaster compatibility for Dos games or is it too new? :)

foxpup
Posts: 1132
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2016, 21:08

#5 Post by foxpup »

My Palomino PC from 2002 likes wary best.

starhawk
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2010, 06:04
Location: Everybody knows this is nowhere...

#6 Post by starhawk »

My recommendation: junk it.

I have used (and abused) a lot of old kit, from Commodore 64s on up. Right now I have, at least in the PC category, an XT that won't boot, a 386 desktop, a 486 laptop, a P1 laptop that needs a weird power cable, a pair of 2009-era netbooks, and the custom desktop that I'm typing this post on.

A Pentium III system can't really cope with today's world. It will hobble around on YouTube like an old cripple, at best -- and at worst, you'll have to download videos to watch them. The first Flash ad it hits will knock it flat.

Besides, Puppy really needs about 512mb RAM, bare minimum, to be happy. You have half of that, and your processor, even for a P3, is kind of slow.

I had a Pentium II laptop for a while... yes, I know that's different. Not by as much as you think, though -- and it had the same amount of RAM. I couldn't get it to run Puppy anywhere near even half-decently. I've spent literally years on that thing, and finally came to the conclusion that it couldn't be done. It sold on eBay a week ago... its one gift to me was the $35 I got from the sale.

You'll be far happier selling yours there and using the proceeds to trade up, than you will poking at it for month after month trying to find something that won't take five minutes to boot and just enough time to be infuriating, in between keypresses or clicks and when the thing actually responds.

As they said about communication in the 90s -- sometimes you just have to face fax ;)

Bin it.

Zup
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun 21 Aug 2016, 18:06

#7 Post by Zup »

Thanks for all the replys.
Robert123 wrote:Lucid 5.2.8.7
Welcome
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=90461
I received the laptop for free without HDD and with a Puppy 5.2.8 CD on the drive, but it seemed a bit slow. Maybe installing it to HDD could speed up things a little, but I'm not sure.
Sailor Enceladus wrote:For what it's worth, I have gotten almost all windows programs that worked in Windows 98 to work in Wine with Puppy. At a point I kept Win98 around because a few crashed in Wine, but I found out that changing winecfg settings in "Graphics" to "Enable virtual desktop" fixed them. Does your Windows 98 laptop have soundblaster compatibility for Dos games or is it too new? :)
I can't get rid of that Windows 98... The main reason is that I needed that laptop because has *real* serial, parallel and floppy disk. I use that parallel port with a Willem EPROM burner and the floppy disk with some tools to write old computers disks (=8 bit computers, like ZX Spectrum and Amstrad CPC).

The programas involved have not native Linux versions, and I don't want to risk to use them under wine (latency with I/O may be a concern).

About the soundcard, I'm not fully tested it. Some sites states that can have full DOS support (but I need some drivers) even in clean DOS (=without booting Windows 98 first) but I'd like to see it.
starhawk wrote:My recommendation: junk it.
As I said before, I need that serial and parallel ports and that floppy disk drive. USB adapters are useless, because the software meant for that machine is hardwired to real port adresses (i.e.: 0x378 for parallel port) and USB FDDs can't write only PC format floppies (80 tracks, 2 sides, either 9 or 18 sectors/track starting at 0... and some FDDs can only write 18 sectors/track).

That Puppy is meant to do basic tasks and to complement Windows 98 so older Puppies can do the job.

Although that computer can't cope with modern internet, it can be useful to check documents and having *real* legacy devices is a must. I think that most computer techies should have one of those at their works.

Robert123
Posts: 362
Joined: Fri 20 May 2016, 05:22
Location: Pacific

#8 Post by Robert123 »

Certainly agree with you there Zup another possibility that is for old computers is AnitaOS by darry1966 - the 412 version non-smp version may work for you plus there is software there to compliment it and browsers to run.

https://sourceforge.net/projects/anitaos/

https://sourceforge.net/projects/anitao ... o/download
Devuan Linux, Stardust 013 (4.31) updated [url]https://archive.org/details/Stardustpup013glibc2.10[/url]
s57(2018)barebone[url]https://sourceforge.net/projects/puppy-linux-minimal-builds/files/s57%282018%29barebones.iso/download[/url]

ndujoe1
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 01:06

#9 Post by ndujoe1 »

i recommend 4.31

User avatar
nic007
Posts: 3408
Joined: Sun 13 Nov 2011, 12:31
Location: Cradle of Humankind

#10 Post by nic007 »

Zup wrote:Thanks for all the replys.
Robert123 wrote:Lucid 5.2.8.7
Welcome
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=90461
I received the laptop for free without HDD and with a Puppy 5.2.8 CD on the drive, but it seemed a bit slow. Maybe installing it to HDD could speed up things a little, but I'm not sure.
Sailor Enceladus wrote:For what it's worth, I have gotten almost all windows programs that worked in Windows 98 to work in Wine with Puppy. At a point I kept Win98 around because a few crashed in Wine, but I found out that changing winecfg settings in "Graphics" to "Enable virtual desktop" fixed them. Does your Windows 98 laptop have soundblaster compatibility for Dos games or is it too new? :)
I can't get rid of that Windows 98... The main reason is that I needed that laptop because has *real* serial, parallel and floppy disk. I use that parallel port with a Willem EPROM burner and the floppy disk with some tools to write old computers disks (=8 bit computers, like ZX Spectrum and Amstrad CPC).

The programas involved have not native Linux versions, and I don't want to risk to use them under wine (latency with I/O may be a concern).

About the soundcard, I'm not fully tested it. Some sites states that can have full DOS support (but I need some drivers) even in clean DOS (=without booting Windows 98 first) but I'd like to see it.
starhawk wrote:My recommendation: junk it.
As I said before, I need that serial and parallel ports and that floppy disk drive. USB adapters are useless, because the software meant for that machine is hardwired to real port adresses (i.e.: 0x378 for parallel port) and USB FDDs can't write only PC format floppies (80 tracks, 2 sides, either 9 or 18 sectors/track starting at 0... and some FDDs can only write 18 sectors/track).

That Puppy is meant to do basic tasks and to complement Windows 98 so older Puppies can do the job.

Although that computer can't cope with modern internet, it can be useful to check documents and having *real* legacy devices is a must. I think that most computer techies should have one of those at their works.
It will definitely run faster from HDD. If the full system is not copied into RAM from CD (which is probably your case), running from CD will be slow, guaranteed.

starhawk
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2010, 06:04
Location: Everybody knows this is nowhere...

#11 Post by starhawk »

OK, my mistake, I thought it was for general use.

What exactly are you doing with it, if I may ask?

Sailor Enceladus
Posts: 1543
Joined: Mon 22 Feb 2016, 19:43

#12 Post by Sailor Enceladus »

starhawk wrote:OK, my mistake, I thought it was for general use.

What exactly are you doing with it, if I may ask?
Same here. Interesting stuff Zup. Thanks for the explanation.

starhawk
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2010, 06:04
Location: Everybody knows this is nowhere...

#13 Post by starhawk »

Zup wrote:I can't get rid of that Windows 98... The main reason is that I needed that laptop because has *real* serial, parallel and floppy disk. I use that parallel port with a Willem EPROM burner and the floppy disk with some tools to write old computers disks (=8 bit computers, like ZX Spectrum and Amstrad CPC).

The programas involved have not native Linux versions, and I don't want to risk to use them under wine (latency with I/O may be a concern).
Missed this, above. For what it's worth, I recently bought one of these programmers. I haven't used it yet... yet. But it claimed at the time (the listing has since changed) to be Linux compatible. I have not yet tested that claim...

I know that alone won't solve your floppy requirement -- but it may help with ROM gear... I don't know. Depends on how attached you are to the old UV EPROMs :P (seriously, there's very little difference, pinout-wise, between a 27Cxx chip and its 28Cxx version... and since 28Cxx chips program just like SRAM, they're easier to use...)

By the way, the first use of that programmer, at least, the one I have -- is to program the ROM for a 6502 system :D I'm getting started with a little homebrew setup that drives a very strange serial LCD. Doesn't have to do much... which makes it perfect as a first step toward learning such things.

Zup
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun 21 Aug 2016, 18:06

#14 Post by Zup »

OK, so I've got (almost) ready my laptop.

At first I tested that Puppy Linux 4.3.1 with updates, and I must say that it's a complete waste of time. I burn in into a CD and then installed to hard disk (complete install on ext2 partition with swap) using Grub as boot selector.

The system starts fine, but...
- Most icons have no actions assigned. Click on setup and you'll get setup, click on edit and you won't get anything. Strange, because the updated version is way bigger than the normal version.
- Printer set up don't work.
- I've tried to install programs from Puppy repositories, but they have broken dependencies.
- Network setup don't save DNS information (maybe network scripts don't get that information). Every time I run with static IP, DNS is 192.168.1.1.

I didn't even try to resolve that problems. I downloaded and installed plain Puppy Linux 4.3.1 and everything works. Most packages were already installed and everything I've installed from repositories works.

Post Reply