Yes, I agree, and commented about the bloat aspects in my post here:solo wrote:Though I see how the snap format has advantages from a developers point of view, there are also a definate downside to it.
...
The problem is of course, that snap packages remain self contained when installed, including all dependencies.
This means there's a whole lot of redundancy (see how I'm trying to avoid the word 'bloat') being created, and this will express itself in drive space.
.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 940#908940
EDIT2: I've since added comment to above post about de-duplication, which seems to offer shared libs possibility, though I've not read up about the details as yet.
William
EDIT: By the way, the laptop I mainly use is 64bit capable core-II duo machine, but it's around 8 or 9 years old now I think, and has 2 GB RAM and no hard-drive (booting from frugal install on 16GB SD card usually, so relatively low on resources generally). However, it is true that such resource limitations are tending to vanish on newer machines and I believe snap applications, being self-contained in terms of libs used, probably result in a more stable system in the sense that an app crashing won't probably cause other apps to also crash (?)