How many 64bit Puppy projects are there now?

A home for all kinds of Puppy related projects
Message
Author
tomhewitt

How many 64bit Puppy projects are there now?

#1 Post by tomhewitt »

How many 64bit Puppy projects are there now?

Fatdog , Lighthouse any others?

gcmartin

#2 Post by gcmartin »

In Puppyland, these can be found
  • TahrPUP64
    LxPUP64
    Slacko64
    April64
    EmSee (when DVD boots, user is presented 32 or a 64bit option)
    Just-LightHouse64 as well as Chubby64 found on the same thread)
There is one other that is also a low-latency distro for musicians, but, general purposed, as well.

Hope this list is helpful
Edit: My Mistake. I should have looked at my download library of PUPs I have tested. Corrected to LxPUP64. Rapid Pup is also one of those in the library that was tested with great results, as well. Apologies to all.
Last edited by gcmartin on Tue 07 Apr 2015, 06:59, edited 3 times in total.

anewuser
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun 05 Feb 2012, 20:00

#3 Post by anewuser »

FatDog64

Dry Falls
Posts: 616
Joined: Tue 16 Dec 2014, 23:37
Location: Upper Columbia

#4 Post by Dry Falls »

alphaOS64 (< archpup)

tomhewitt

#5 Post by tomhewitt »

More than i thought, Cheers guys. :)

User avatar
Ted Dog
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2005, 02:35
Location: Heart of Texas

#6 Post by Ted Dog »

StudioV2 = the low-latency distro for musicians comes in 64bit

s243a
Posts: 2580
Joined: Tue 02 Sep 2014, 04:48
Contact:

#7 Post by s243a »

I made a list of all the 64 bit verions of puppylinux mentioned above with the associated links.
http://www.pearltrees.com/s243a/64bit-c ... id13972177

The only one I couldn't find was:
LxTahrPUP64

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#8 Post by peebee »

s243a wrote:The only one I couldn't find was:
LxTahrPUP64
That is because it doesn't exist....

There is only LxPup64 - a Slacko64 derivative:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 840#814840
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

User avatar
ETP
Posts: 1193
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2010, 19:55
Location: UK

Another 64bit for the list.

#9 Post by ETP »

Rapid Pup V1 Released 7th March 2015
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 566#832566
This Pup is based on BarryK’s Quirky April 7.0.1 x86_64 k 3.17.4
Regards ETP
[url=http://tinyurl.com/pxzq8o9][img]https://s17.postimg.cc/tl19y14y7/You_Tube_signature80px.png[/img][/url]
[url=http://tinyurl.com/kennels2/]Kennels[/url]

tomhewitt

#10 Post by tomhewitt »

Thanks , Spoilt for choice. :)

gcmartin

#11 Post by gcmartin »

Simplicity64 has also been tested.

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#12 Post by peebee »

gcmartin wrote:Simplicity64 has also been tested.
Which is just LxPup64 tweaked a bit (i.e. another Slacko64 derivative).....
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

bark_bark_bark
Posts: 1885
Joined: Tue 05 Jun 2012, 12:17
Location: Wisconsin USA

#13 Post by bark_bark_bark »

Dry Falls wrote:alphaOS64 (< archpup)
alphaOS is a joke probably developed by a meth-head.
....

tomhewitt

#14 Post by tomhewitt »

bark_bark_bark wrote:
Dry Falls wrote:alphaOS64 (< archpup)
alphaOS is a joke probably developed by a meth-head.
Why is that> :?:

tomhewitt

Re: Another 64bit for the list.

#15 Post by tomhewitt »

ETP wrote:Rapid Pup V1 Released 7th March 2015
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 566#832566
This Pup is based on BarryK’s Quirky April 7.0.1 x86_64 k 3.17.4
Has Barry ever given his thoughts about you converting Quirky to 64bit as i thought he was quite protective of that project.? :)

User avatar
Ted Dog
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2005, 02:35
Location: Heart of Texas

#16 Post by Ted Dog »

lol April is Quirky... for now.. whatever is under development he says is Quirky, or unstable releases, that may or may not have a future. Since he gave it a name April then he plans on sticking with the concepts for a while.
Just whenever Quirky is used its a code word for experimental and or unstable release. Most of us view Quirky as the way BK developed Puppylinux in the olden days, he added new ideas weekly, we would be release junkies. With puppylinux getting popular, he logically had to stop being so cutting edge creative.

User avatar
Ted Dog
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2005, 02:35
Location: Heart of Texas

#17 Post by Ted Dog »

BK is not that protective of the source or build tool, he has it all available online, however he does protect name and related like branding or trademark, and proper attribution.
If he was so protective then the thousand plus spinoff and spinoffs of spinoffs ( see above ) would never existed.
Since I saw your post on Fatdog64 I think you are hunting for replacement. I would recommend Slacko64 but its a bit dated, I believe the Lx version would be the most active spinoff if you need something more current and less ( quirky )

User avatar
ETP
Posts: 1193
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2010, 19:55
Location: UK

RE: Another 64bit for the list.

#18 Post by ETP »

@tomhewitt

The summary in this thread may help explain matters.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=97897
BarryK has been issuing 64bit versions since January 2015.
A 64bit base was used for Rapid Pup so there was no need for conversion.
Regards ETP
[url=http://tinyurl.com/pxzq8o9][img]https://s17.postimg.cc/tl19y14y7/You_Tube_signature80px.png[/img][/url]
[url=http://tinyurl.com/kennels2/]Kennels[/url]

tomhewitt

#19 Post by tomhewitt »

Seems to me the other projects such as Fatdog would be better off basing themselves on Quirky 64bit just like Rapid so they have working packages and drivers that people have been working on for the Quirky project.

Fatdogs excuse is people use old computers but if it's that old and lacking ram then people should be using 32bit nanolinux desktop at 14mb , Not 64 bit base.

Keisha
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue 18 Nov 2014, 05:43

#20 Post by Keisha »

tomhewitt wrote:Seems to me the other projects such as Fatdog would be better off basing themselves on Quirky 64bit just like Rapid so they have working packages and drivers that people have been working on for the Quirky project.

Fatdogs excuse is people use old computers but if it's that old and lacking ram then people should be using 32bit nanolinux desktop at 14mb , Not 64 bit base.
Things aren't that cut-and-dried.

Building 64-bit Linux is not a well-proven art. These are the early days, there is still much pioneering to be done.

The easy road is to take some other distro's binaries, trust that they are well-built, reconfigure them into a live-boot runs-in-ram architecture such as Puppy's, and slap-in your own init scripts. Such as Slacko64, AlphaOS (Arch-based), and the upup zoo (raring tahr unicorn etc.). Best craftsmanship in 64-bit slap-together I've seen is the Lighthouse series of Puppies.

In contrast, there are two independent build-from-the-toolchain-up procedures : LFS (Linux from Scratch) and T2.

FatDog is an LFS build, Quirky April is T2.

It remains to be seen whether one or the another has a clear advantage.

It takes maybe 10,000 hours to build a distro like Quirky or Fatdog.

Some drivers like Maserati's, some like Lamborghini's...ouch my eyes!--both are impressive toys.

Good to see the Puppy community well represented in both build arenas. Someday, someone might even succeed in making a truly magnificent 64-bit Puppy. Or Ubuntu, or Slackware, or Debian, or Fedora...

Theodore Roosevelt and Rudyard Kipling quotes come to mind.

Mike (still a 32-bit user, currently in DebianDog)
“A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer.â€￾ --Bruce Lee

Post Reply