tahrpup 6.0.5 CE
i'm putting together a new iso of all fixes so far. This is just a bug-fix build, chiefly for new users so that they get a more complete iso.
it will basically be as similar as possible to tahrpup 6.0 with the service pack, fixed kernel and all bug-fixes so far.
it needs to be the same because tahrpup 6.0 and the new iso will be using the same updates from quickpet.
testing iso (not final)
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pu ... sting2.iso
b80d49be9b18b8cda350aed0b6a7a50d
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pu ... _6.0.1.sfs
61e193fa9e05fab21a0ff1c03c724ed4
it will basically be as similar as possible to tahrpup 6.0 with the service pack, fixed kernel and all bug-fixes so far.
it needs to be the same because tahrpup 6.0 and the new iso will be using the same updates from quickpet.
testing iso (not final)
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pu ... sting2.iso
b80d49be9b18b8cda350aed0b6a7a50d
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pu ... _6.0.1.sfs
61e193fa9e05fab21a0ff1c03c724ed4
Last edited by 666philb on Sat 17 Jan 2015, 00:24, edited 1 time in total.
Bionicpup64 built with bionic beaver packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=114311
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Hi,
Tas doesn't work because ffmpeg and some libraries lack.
I put together ffmpeg_2.5.2, libass5, libfdk-aac, libx265 in a pet and a sfs and it works fine.
ffmpeg is needed by pmusic and it's ok also for pmusic and a lot of other things.
Pet (32 MB)
SFS
Philippe
Tas doesn't work because ffmpeg and some libraries lack.
I put together ffmpeg_2.5.2, libass5, libfdk-aac, libx265 in a pet and a sfs and it works fine.
ffmpeg is needed by pmusic and it's ok also for pmusic and a lot of other things.
Pet (32 MB)
SFS
Philippe
Last edited by augras on Fri 15 May 2015, 08:15, edited 2 times in total.
Hi Philippeaugras wrote:Tas doesn't work because ffmpeg and some libraries lake.
You mean "Take a Shot!", right? If so, did you try v1.9?
I just checked in VBox with TahrPup-6.0.1 and it's still fine here...Changelog wrote:Version 1.9:
- compatibility with avconv
Greetings!
[color=red][size=75][O]bdurate [R]ules [D]estroy [E]nthusiastic [R]ebels => [C]reative [H]umans [A]lways [O]pen [S]ource[/size][/color]
[b][color=green]Omnia mea mecum porto.[/color][/b]
[b][color=green]Omnia mea mecum porto.[/color][/b]
Hi 666philb666philb wrote:i'm putting together a new iso of all fixes so far. This is just a bug-fix build, chiefly for new users so that they get a more complete iso.
it will basically be as similar as possible to tahrpup 6.0 with the service pack, fixed kernel and all bug-fixes so far.
it needs to be the same because tahrpup 6.0 and the new iso will be using the same updates from quickpet.
testing iso (not final)
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pu ... -6.0.1.iso
3cf39d490b725eeaf9a56067b605d95
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pu ... _6.0.1.sfs
21b7a6ff8e392a4e31d8974391485f37
Is the new iso pae or no-pae? I'm not aware that there is any way to tell is there? Never seen this aspect in any system reports......
Thanks
peebee
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
hi peebee,
it's noPAE... pupsys-info can show PAE, noPAE.... on the kernel info section
it's noPAE... pupsys-info can show PAE, noPAE.... on the kernel info section
Bionicpup64 built with bionic beaver packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=114311
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Thanks - can confirm that Broadcom wl driver built for new 3.14.20-nopae kernel build works.666philb wrote:hi peebee,
it's noPAE... pupsys-info can show PAE, noPAE.... on the kernel info section
# freememapplet_tray is not working
Segmentation fault when run in terminal
Cheers
peebee
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Hello 666PhilB
But, with @Shinobar's BIOS unlock for the few pesky PentiumMs AND THOSE MEMBERS REPORTING that it does work, would it reduce your build efforts should you include it. Couple other distro developers have produced PUPs which have the Intel "fix" exposing the hidden PAE. This patch allows PUPs to run on PCs with or without the PAE feature exposed from the processor.
This needs no reply. But, if you want to see for yourself, you might take a look in an effort to reduce your workload (of build, test, and support of 2 versions) to the community while at the same time providing a distro which addresses most every x86 PC in the world.
Hope this helps.
This post IN NO WAY intends to enter into a discussion of PAE vs anything.... pupsys-info can show PAE, noPAE.... on the kernel info section
But, with @Shinobar's BIOS unlock for the few pesky PentiumMs AND THOSE MEMBERS REPORTING that it does work, would it reduce your build efforts should you include it. Couple other distro developers have produced PUPs which have the Intel "fix" exposing the hidden PAE. This patch allows PUPs to run on PCs with or without the PAE feature exposed from the processor.
This needs no reply. But, if you want to see for yourself, you might take a look in an effort to reduce your workload (of build, test, and support of 2 versions) to the community while at the same time providing a distro which addresses most every x86 PC in the world.
Hope this helps.
Yes, it's Take a shot. And i tried tas1.8 with no success. Where did you find a v1.9 ?SFR wrote: You mean "Take a Shot!", right? If so, did you try v1.9?I just checked in VBox with TahrPup-6.0.1 and it's still fine here...Changelog wrote:Version 1.9:
- compatibility with avconv
Greetings!
Have a good day,
Philippe
EDIT : i get it http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=84528
thancks for this utility SFR.
whilst it works for some there were others where it didn't work (from personal experience) so a noPAE option is definitely neededgcmartin wrote:Hello 666PhilBThis post IN NO WAY intends to enter into a discussion of PAE vs anything.... pupsys-info can show PAE, noPAE.... on the kernel info section
But, with @Shinobar's BIOS unlock for the few pesky PentiumMs AND THOSE MEMBERS REPORTING that it does work, would it reduce your build efforts should you include it. Couple other distro developers have produced PUPs which have the Intel "fix" exposing the hidden PAE. This patch allows PUPs to run on PCs with or without the PAE feature exposed from the processor.
This needs no reply. But, if you want to see for yourself, you might take a look in an effort to reduce your workload (of build, test, and support of 2 versions) to the community while at the same time providing a distro which addresses most every x86 PC in the world.
Hope this helps.
Bionicpup64 built with bionic beaver packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=114311
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Additional:
# freememapplet_tray is not working
Segmentation fault when run in terminal
after a reboot and savefile creation
==============
new ppm - auto uninstall - doesn't run the puninstall.sh script in the same way that the classic step by step uninstall does....
==============
only place I can find no-pae mentioned in pup-sysinfo is in the kernel log
the sys-specs - kernel report does not indicate
# freememapplet_tray is not working
Segmentation fault when run in terminal
after a reboot and savefile creation
==============
new ppm - auto uninstall - doesn't run the puninstall.sh script in the same way that the classic step by step uninstall does....
==============
only place I can find no-pae mentioned in pup-sysinfo is in the kernel log
the sys-specs - kernel report does not indicate
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
thanks peebee,
i noticed the freememapplet_tray problem ... i'm doing a build now using an earlier woofCE to see if it's something that's crept in there.
regarding the PPM , it's still in testing and you should post your findings here http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=96710
i noticed the freememapplet_tray problem ... i'm doing a build now using an earlier woofCE to see if it's something that's crept in there.
regarding the PPM , it's still in testing and you should post your findings here http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=96710
Bionicpup64 built with bionic beaver packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=114311
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
peebee,peebee wrote:only place I can find no-pae mentioned in pup-sysinfo is in the kernel log
the sys-specs - kernel report does not indicate
The PAE status report was added to PupSysInfo-2.5.2 (07 Oct 2014), and will be included as well in version 2.5.3 (available soon).
Sys-Specs -> Base Report
Sys-Specs -> Kernel report
File -> Hardware Reports -> Summary and Complete
[color=blue][b][url=http://www.smokey01.com/radky/PupMates.html]PupMates[/url][/b][/color]
new iso uploaded
i used a woof before '/initrd/pup_rw' became a symlink and freememapplet_tray seems to be working properly now.
deleted some superfluous right click entries and fixed others
added ndiswrapper and also a 'depmod -a' on first boot to enable it
i'm considering adding ca-certificates to the build as some apps need them.
testing iso (not final)
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pu ... sting2.iso
b80d49be9b18b8cda350aed0b6a7a50d
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pu ... _6.0.1.sfs
61e193fa9e05fab21a0ff1c03c724ed4[/url]
i used a woof before '/initrd/pup_rw' became a symlink and freememapplet_tray seems to be working properly now.
deleted some superfluous right click entries and fixed others
added ndiswrapper and also a 'depmod -a' on first boot to enable it
i'm considering adding ca-certificates to the build as some apps need them.
testing iso (not final)
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pu ... sting2.iso
b80d49be9b18b8cda350aed0b6a7a50d
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pu ... _6.0.1.sfs
61e193fa9e05fab21a0ff1c03c724ed4[/url]
Last edited by 666philb on Sat 17 Jan 2015, 17:40, edited 1 time in total.
Bionicpup64 built with bionic beaver packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=114311
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Hi,
I keep ffmpeg : a lot of things need it.
Philippe
Of course you are right ! Tas1.9 works fine without ffmpeg.SFR wrote:Hi Philippeaugras wrote:Tas doesn't work because ffmpeg and some libraries lake.
You mean "Take a Shot!", right? If so, did you try v1.9?I just checked in VBox with TahrPup-6.0.1 and it's still fine here...Changelog wrote:Version 1.9:
- compatibility with avconv
Greetings!
I keep ffmpeg : a lot of things need it.
Philippe
Couldn't possibly be that "freememapplet_tray" is a version that pre dates 'initrd/pup_rw' becoming a symlink?666philb wrote:i used a woof before '/initrd/pup_rw' became a symlink and freememapplet_tray seems to be working properly now.
("freememapplet_tray" did have to be patched at that time.)
gyro
hi giro,
any idea where the patched one is?
any idea where the patched one is?
Bionicpup64 built with bionic beaver packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=114311
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Did you try looking in this topic? http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 2&start=30666philb wrote:any idea where the patched one is?
gyro
Edit: Or you can extract a binary from this sfs file, http://www.fishprogs.info/puppy/tahr6/ydrv_tahr_6.0.sfs
Edit2: Or you can use this http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 801#821801
thanks gyro
Bionicpup64 built with bionic beaver packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=114311
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
666Philb:
I have been following your distro for a while and to be honest, I was a little disappointed when it first came out. Barry's Tahr had fewer flaws and though I liked the way Tahrpup cosmetically looked, I was unable to overcome some of the initial issues that were sticking out (don't ask me what they were, it's been a while).
Turning the page, your continued efforts to improve Tahrpup have clearly shown a significant improvement from the original offering. The test iso on the prior page is significantly better than the original. So I just wanted to personally thank you as this is now a pup that is both cosmetically pleasing but also a well polished pup.
Congratulations on your fine efforts and thanks for one of my favorite of my ever growing pup collection.
Best regards,
Slavvo67
I have been following your distro for a while and to be honest, I was a little disappointed when it first came out. Barry's Tahr had fewer flaws and though I liked the way Tahrpup cosmetically looked, I was unable to overcome some of the initial issues that were sticking out (don't ask me what they were, it's been a while).
Turning the page, your continued efforts to improve Tahrpup have clearly shown a significant improvement from the original offering. The test iso on the prior page is significantly better than the original. So I just wanted to personally thank you as this is now a pup that is both cosmetically pleasing but also a well polished pup.
Congratulations on your fine efforts and thanks for one of my favorite of my ever growing pup collection.
Best regards,
Slavvo67
There is a norm in Puppy land.
If you really want the thing tested and the bugs found.
Release it as the final release version.
The good thing with Tahrpup is 666philb did not walk away after he did the release version.
I too have seen much improvement with Tahrpup 6.0 CE from that initial release.
Thank you 666philb!!
If you really want the thing tested and the bugs found.
Release it as the final release version.
The good thing with Tahrpup is 666philb did not walk away after he did the release version.
I too have seen much improvement with Tahrpup 6.0 CE from that initial release.
Thank you 666philb!!
The things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected
YaPI(any iso installer)
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected
YaPI(any iso installer)