Java Runtime Environment (SFS)

Message

OscarTalks · #61 Post by **OscarTalks** » Wed 05 Feb 2014, 18:11

I was trying to take a look at some of the other people's jre packages and comparing them with mine. I am no expert on jre, but just to mention a few things I did which may be different:-
I try to go through it and strip everything. This should not affect the function though, it just reduces the size by a very small amount.
I also try to make sure all the permissions are correct and that all the files are owner=root and group=root. Some of the other packages have not done this and although things usually still work if you don't chown to root:root I wonder if that is the cause in this case?

gcmartin · #62 Post by **gcmartin** » Wed 05 Feb 2014, 18:36

@Shinobar & @OscarTalks

Both of you are a credit to the community. Thanks for what each of you are doing to give us this tools and JDK (whose need is becoming more and more apparent as smartDevices are increasing in both number and ability to allow customization by any owner/user).

And certainly, THANKS to both of you, for both of what each is sharing in this thread.

It would be nice to combine your efforts as this is an important need where a consistent PET and SFS for both 32bit and 64bit PUPs can use. Reason: When any user presents a problem if the subsystems were consistent, it could/would reduce developer/member confusion as they assist problem resolution(s).

As such, here is a idea of what is faced with in the PLDF community.

The need for JRE for in 32bit (this may in the future of PUPs become an OOTB in base 32bit PUPs)
The need for JRE for 64bit(this may in the future of PUPs become an OOTB in base 64bit PUPs)
The need for JDK in 32bit or at least a consistent install to a system with a JRE.
The need for JDK in 64bit or at least a consistent install to a system with a JRE.
The functionality needs to be full.

Excepting for some minor bumps that I think you guys are aware, here's where a collaboration between you has great benefit to each. A common product collection means a common solution to any of the above version-releases.

I hope you are able to combined your efforts or come to an agreement on approaches for the mutual benefit of both of you and the community. The 2 of you are providing a very necessary community benefit as smart devices grow as well as cross-system apps continue in numbers. At least the 2 of you understand this need.

Thanks for what you 2 have done thus far with the useful stuff you do.

shinobar · #63 Post by **shinobar** » Thu 06 Feb 2014, 04:03

OscarTalks wrote:I also try to make sure all the permissions are correct and that all the files are owner=root and group=root. Some of the other packages have not done this and although things usually still work if you don't chown to root:root I wonder if that is the cause in this case?

That's it

The file darkcity gave me checks the permission and refuses if it is not proper.
CGoban 3 - KGS
http://files.gokgs.com/javaBin/cgoban.jnlp

I take all the contents from the one OscarTalks made. Add the ROX-Filer MIME stuff.
Uploaded jre-1.7.0.51-1.sfs
http://shino.pos.to/party/bridge.cgi?puppy/opt/

Next pet is the ROX-Filer MIME stuff only:
http://shino.pos.to/party/bridge.cgi?pu ... -jre-1.pet
If you install the jre-1.7u51-i586 by OscarTalks and this rox_filer-MIME-jre-1.pet, it is equivalent with the jre-1.7.0.51-1.sfs above.

Thanks both of you, darkcity and OscarTalks.

gcmartin · #64 Post by **gcmartin** » Thu 06 Feb 2014, 07:28

Thanks @Shinobar!!!

If you have time when you're testing your 64bit PUP distros might there be a consistent 64bit version of your SFS, as well.

Again, Thanks as I see the wisdom in your selection to benefit JRE use.

darkcity · #65 Post by **darkcity** » Thu 06 Feb 2014, 12:16

Thanks for ironing out the problem.

Semme · #66 Post by **Semme** » Fri 28 Mar 2014, 01:04

"JoShinoMan!" There an'ate in the pipe?

gcmartin · #67 Post by **gcmartin** » Fri 28 Mar 2014, 09:59

Hi Shinobar

As I understand, English is not your native language. So @Semme post, below, you may not understand. I offer this translation "There is a JAVA version 8 available from Oracle"

Should you do PET/SFS, I would like to ask for a JDK version as well. More and more of us are getting or have smart phones. The JDK will allow toolkit to added so that we can begin to build integration in Puppy Linux with these devices.

Thanks in advance, if you can.

ggg · #68 Post by **ggg** » Fri 28 Mar 2014, 10:19

gcmartin to shinobar

As I understand, English is not your native language.

ggg to gcmartin

What is your native language and in what language(s) are you fluent?

gcmartin · #69 Post by **gcmartin** » Sat 29 Mar 2014, 20:04

@GGG

That comment was meant to be helpful! I think most would understand that.

Hope this helps

ggg · #70 Post by **ggg** » Sat 29 Mar 2014, 23:41

@gcmartin

I asked you two simple questions.

You are famed for asking questions and I think most of us would appreciate a proper response, I certainly would.

Semme · #71 Post by **Semme** » Sun 30 Mar 2014, 00:35

Triple G.. GC simply thought Shino might struggle translating my question, that's all. Heck

think I struggled ask'n..

ggg · #72 Post by **ggg** » Sun 30 Mar 2014, 00:52

I would be more than surprised if shinobar needed help and I believe he has some familiarity with a few European languages including Double Dutch.

I am not interested in asides, but in answers to my questions.

gcmartin · #73 Post by **gcmartin** » Sun 30 Mar 2014, 02:00

@GGG seems more interested in derailing versus assisting. He may not have noticed the title of this thread. This thread, started by Shinobar, is about JRE and most all comments, until yours, are about helping or addressing such. You may want to move your derailing requests to the open forum. Maybe create your own thread, somewhere. Its a thought.

I will not submit to yours or anyone's bullying tactics. Please reframe from such in the forum, with me or anyone. Please.

ggg · #74 Post by **ggg** » Sun 30 Mar 2014, 03:40

@ gcmartin

l shall refrain (meaning forbear) from stating the obvious conclusions to be drawn from your tetchy response.

However, kindly amend your signature to exclude me from your relatives and your circle; despite the sad possibility that we may have the same ancestors (meaning forbears).

shinobar · #75 Post by **shinobar** » Thu 17 Apr 2014, 11:04

UPDATE: 2014-04-17
jre-1.7.0.55.sfs
http://shino.pos.to/party/bridge.cgi?puppy/opt/

dalebednell · #76 Post by **dalebednell** » Fri 18 Apr 2014, 17:30

Hi Shinobar,

I have installed jre-1.7.0.55.sfs in precise puppy 5.7 when i go java -version in terminal i get jre-1.7-0.55 installed no problem, When i then go to the java site to verify java installation all i get is a box[img] When i go to a site that needs java after a very short time firefox closes what can i do to correct this Thanks in advance

Dale[/img]

shinobar · #77 Post by **shinobar** » Thu 26 Jun 2014, 06:01

UPDATE: 2014-06-26
jre-1.8.0.05.sfs
jre-1.7.0.60.sfs
http://shino.pos.to/party/bridge.cgi?puppy/opt/

shinobar · #78 Post by **shinobar** » Fri 18 Jul 2014, 20:42

UPDATE: jre-1.7.0.65.sfs
http://shino.pos.to/party/bridge.cgi?puppy/opt/

tlchost · #79 Post by **tlchost** » Sat 19 Jul 2014, 09:54

shinobar wrote:UPDATE: jre-1.7.0.65.sfs
http://shino.pos.to/party/bridge.cgi?puppy/opt/

Perhaps my download was bad, but java.com rerports java is not installed.

Using precise571, loaded the java sfs at boot as with older versions that worked.

Tried again, multiple downloads...still does not work. Any help appreciated.

shinobar · #80 Post by **shinobar** » Tue 05 Aug 2014, 11:25

UPDATE: 2014-08-05
jre-1.7.0.67.sfs
http://shino.pos.to/party/bridge.cgi?puppy/opt/

(old)Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

(old)Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

Java Runtime Environment (SFS)

the permissions

JAVA version 8 is released couple weeks back.

Re: JAVA version 8 is released couple weeks back.

jre-1.7.0.55.sfs

java runtime enviroment

jre-1.8.0.05 / jre-1.7.0.60

jre-1.7.0.65

Re: jre-1.7.0.65

jre-1.7.0.67