Firefox Plug-in Flash Help for Winded Old Junkers [Outdated]

How to do things, solutions, recipes, tutorials
Message
Author
User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#41 Post by mikeb »

Now if we just had a drop in replacement for FireFox that wasn't so bloated.
erm ff 3.6 perhaps....

mike

User avatar
RetroTechGuy
Posts: 2947
Joined: Tue 15 Dec 2009, 17:20
Location: USA

#42 Post by RetroTechGuy »

mikeb wrote:
Now if we just had a drop in replacement for FireFox that wasn't so bloated.
erm ff 3.6 perhaps....

mike
I tried a few of the "retro" (FF) packages, and a large number of sites informed me that they would soon disallow connections with those "vulnerable" browsers... :evil:

I had broken things so bad that I had to use Dillo to get new copies of FF (since I had pretty well corrupted stuff with the others)
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=58615]Add swapfile[/url]
[url=http://wellminded.net63.net/]WellMinded Search[/url]
[url=http://puppylinux.us/psearch.html]PuppyLinux.US Search[/url]

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#43 Post by mikeb »

I tried a few of the "retro" (FF) packages, and a large number of sites informed me that they would soon disallow connections with those "vulnerable" browsers... Evil or Very Mad
well that very unsporting of them...I get the odd whine but no threats of that order...any site in particular?

But if it is a problem then spoofiing your version is easy with a simple addon like UAControl.

I can use firefox 1.5 and flash 9 on you tube by spoofing as an example with no whining..

Its all crap anyway..your browser choice does not affect their site...the browsers are safe in the real world...they are not Internet explorer....only real 'complaint' they will have is not supporting some 'orrible javascript that does naughty things to you....

Don't be bullied into sludgeland...

mike

mcewanw
Posts: 3169
Joined: Thu 16 Aug 2007, 10:48
Contact:

#44 Post by mcewanw »

RetroTechGuy wrote: My old desktop "only" has 1 GB RAM -- FF will crash it, if I turn off the 1 GB Swap.
None of my computers have more than 1 GB RAM. I never create or use a swap file or partition and I generally run Firefox. I've used various version up to and including the latest and don't experience any crashes - despite FF being bloated and watching Youtube fullscreen and also having many tabs open at the same time often.

I can't help but wonder if you have a faulty RAM chip that causes the crash once certain RAM areas are accessed. I've had problems like that in the past.
github mcewanw

User avatar
Moat
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 16 Jul 2013, 06:04
Location: Mid-mitten

#45 Post by Moat »

mcewanw wrote: None of my computers have more than 1 GB RAM. I never create or use a swap file or partition and I generally run Firefox. I've used various version up to and including the latest and don't experience any crashes - despite FF being bloated and watching Youtube fullscreen and also having many tabs open at the same time often.
I was going to mention essentially the same thing. On both a weak single-cored Atom netbook and a circa 2005 HP lappy - both with 1Gb RAM and no swap - various Puppies (currently Precise Retro 5.7.1) and other Linux distros run newer Firefoxes without complaint. Firefox typically uses an additional 150-200 Mb RAM when open, and additional CPU use is only a few percent unless scrolling (during which it spikes 40-100%).

Firefox IS relatively bloated compared to many other browsers, but it's a matter of "you get what you pay for". Firefox's stability, extensibility and tweakability (especially via about:config) are second to none IMHO - and these mediocre machines run it without hiccup. You just have to get used to waiting a few more seconds for it to load on opening, compared to other lighter alternatives.

Not sure why you're having such problems, RetroTechGuy. :?:

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#46 Post by mikeb »

yes I did wonder...my tests with firefox 4+ did show a much larger profile but ok in terms of usability on a pentium 3 machine with 512mb ram

Chrome is 4 times the size I last saw.... thats getting large at 80MB compressed.

mike

disciple
Posts: 6984
Joined: Sun 21 May 2006, 01:46
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

#47 Post by disciple »

Moat wrote:Firefox's stability, extensibility and tweakability (especially via about:config) are second to none IMHO
I'm very skeptical about the stability - from what I can tell it is the least stable of the major linux browsers.
Do you know a good gtkdialog program? Please post a link here

Classic Puppy quotes

ROOT FOREVER
GTK2 FOREVER

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#48 Post by mikeb »

Every browser instability I have had has been traced down to a buggy gtk2 build and changing it sorts it out...bit of a puppy feature once upon a time...seems much better now..


mike

disciple
Posts: 6984
Joined: Sun 21 May 2006, 01:46
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

#49 Post by disciple »

Yes, I was ignoring the standard Puppy seamonkey crash due to a faulty GTK. I didn't realise it affected other browsers to though.
Do you know a good gtkdialog program? Please post a link here

Classic Puppy quotes

ROOT FOREVER
GTK2 FOREVER

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#50 Post by mikeb »

yes unfortunately ...either gtk or glib or both with flash sometimes thrown into the equation.... I don't miss those times :)

mike

User avatar
RetroTechGuy
Posts: 2947
Joined: Tue 15 Dec 2009, 17:20
Location: USA

#51 Post by RetroTechGuy »

dupe
Last edited by RetroTechGuy on Fri 27 Dec 2013, 00:09, edited 1 time in total.
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=58615]Add swapfile[/url]
[url=http://wellminded.net63.net/]WellMinded Search[/url]
[url=http://puppylinux.us/psearch.html]PuppyLinux.US Search[/url]

User avatar
RetroTechGuy
Posts: 2947
Joined: Tue 15 Dec 2009, 17:20
Location: USA

#52 Post by RetroTechGuy »

Moat wrote:
mcewanw wrote: None of my computers have more than 1 GB RAM. I never create or use a swap file or partition and I generally run Firefox. I've used various version up to and including the latest and don't experience any crashes - despite FF being bloated and watching Youtube fullscreen and also having many tabs open at the same time often.
I was going to mention essentially the same thing. On both a weak single-cored Atom netbook and a circa 2005 HP lappy - both with 1Gb RAM and no swap - various Puppies (currently Precise Retro 5.7.1) and other Linux distros run newer Firefoxes without complaint. Firefox typically uses an additional 150-200 Mb RAM when open, and additional CPU use is only a few percent unless scrolling (during which it spikes 40-100%).

Firefox IS relatively bloated compared to many other browsers, but it's a matter of "you get what you pay for". Firefox's stability, extensibility and tweakability (especially via about:config) are second to none IMHO - and these mediocre machines run it without hiccup. You just have to get used to waiting a few more seconds for it to load on opening, compared to other lighter alternatives.

Not sure why you're having such problems, RetroTechGuy. :?:
I guess I should do a hardware scan. Though it doesn't seem like anything run into problem any other time (although, no other package exhibits a RAM load of a 8-900 MB -- I watch the RAM as I'm running it, and it bloats up until all RAM is loaded, and then sometimes rolls on into swap.)

Here's what my newer laptop shows (I have only FF and ROXterm running, beyond base system)

Code: Select all

              total         used         free       shared      buffers
  Mem:      3014600      1113960      1900640            0        31932
 Swap:            0            0            0
Total:      3014600      1113960      1900640
Thus far, "top" reports that FF is "only" eating 721 MB RAM... It hasn't been running long enough to really bloat up (I've seen it hang at 1.5 GB RAM on this machine -- fortunately I have enough space that it doesn't hammer it)
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=58615]Add swapfile[/url]
[url=http://wellminded.net63.net/]WellMinded Search[/url]
[url=http://puppylinux.us/psearch.html]PuppyLinux.US Search[/url]

User avatar
RetroTechGuy
Posts: 2947
Joined: Tue 15 Dec 2009, 17:20
Location: USA

#53 Post by RetroTechGuy »

Edit: let me really "light up" Firefox. I opened about a dozen FB pages... I have 2 pieces of FF in "top". My total load is now about 1.7 GB, most of that in FF...

Of course, on my machine with 1GB RAM, this would completely flatten it...
Attachments
Firefox.jpg
(75.8 KiB) Downloaded 266 times
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=58615]Add swapfile[/url]
[url=http://wellminded.net63.net/]WellMinded Search[/url]
[url=http://puppylinux.us/psearch.html]PuppyLinux.US Search[/url]

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#54 Post by mikeb »

Hmm expected usage for me below...add say 150MB for heavy use and newer version.

Sounds more like a memory leak since usage is normally proportional to space available and should not hit max ...what addons do you have and does it happen with other firefox versions...? Any other pattern..particular sites?

mike

User avatar
Moat
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 16 Jul 2013, 06:04
Location: Mid-mitten

#55 Post by Moat »

From my aforementioned netbook, since upgraded to 2Gb RAM - FF v25.0.1, 9 tabs open, large file downloading in background -

(never uploaded a pic, so I'll see if this works...)
Attachments
image-2.jpg
(94.85 KiB) Downloaded 308 times

User avatar
RetroTechGuy
Posts: 2947
Joined: Tue 15 Dec 2009, 17:20
Location: USA

#56 Post by RetroTechGuy »

mikeb wrote:Hmm expected usage for me below...add say 150MB for heavy use and newer version.

Sounds more like a memory leak since usage is normally proportional to space available and should not hit max ...what addons do you have and does it happen with other firefox versions...? Any other pattern..particular sites?

mike
This is FF 26.0. It looks like a memory leak of some sort... I think that this behavior started in the last few versions...

(years ago, Netscape used to sometimes exhibit memory leaks, and crash the browser -- maybe the FF guys figured out how to incorporate that "feature")

I typically run AdBlockPlus, NoScript, DownLoadThemAll, DownloadHelper.
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=58615]Add swapfile[/url]
[url=http://wellminded.net63.net/]WellMinded Search[/url]
[url=http://puppylinux.us/psearch.html]PuppyLinux.US Search[/url]

User avatar
RetroTechGuy
Posts: 2947
Joined: Tue 15 Dec 2009, 17:20
Location: USA

#57 Post by RetroTechGuy »

I'm apparently not alone. A number of people have reported 1.7GB RAM usage...

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/quest ... 643?page=2

This article is interesting... A couple options that let you explore the usage:

http://lifehacker.com/find-out-which-ex ... 1339291204
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=58615]Add swapfile[/url]
[url=http://wellminded.net63.net/]WellMinded Search[/url]
[url=http://puppylinux.us/psearch.html]PuppyLinux.US Search[/url]

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#58 Post by mikeb »

yeah was going to suggest trying 'safemode'...ie all addons disabled...

Yes I remember netscape crashing on 98.... some said it was a MS trick but who knows... but someone on a forum suggested firefox which was at 0.6 then and it worked like a charm... so a long association has ensued..

mike

User avatar
Colonel Panic
Posts: 2171
Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09

#59 Post by Colonel Panic »

Maybe the answer is to use the Firefox ESR series instead of the latest mainstream ones? I'm posting this from Firefox 17.0.11 (in Racy ER) and even with 3 tabs open including a youtube video playing, no flash blocking or other memory saving aids, and the ESR update downloading, Gkrellm shows just 200 MB of RAM in use. I think that's pretty impressive for a browser (and distro) in 2013.
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.

User avatar
RetroTechGuy
Posts: 2947
Joined: Tue 15 Dec 2009, 17:20
Location: USA

#60 Post by RetroTechGuy »

mikeb wrote:yeah was going to suggest trying 'safemode'...ie all addons disabled...

Yes I remember netscape crashing on 98.... some said it was a MS trick but who knows... but someone on a forum suggested firefox which was at 0.6 then and it worked like a charm... so a long association has ensued..

mike
I was running NyetScrape on Debian 1.3 at that time. That was the only program that I ever ran, which crashed the machine (it caused a reset/reboot). (I had a whopping 64MB RAM on that beast...)

I used the "lifehacker" suggestions to examine the memory. It apparently isn't any of the extensions. The main piece of FF is eating about half, and FF is apparently initiating a pile of java crap, which is eating the other half...

The good part is that the tool reports the same memory load that "top" does... Between the 2 pieces, it shows well over 1 GB (that's a problem for this desktop machine).

An interesting note... Using the FF memory usage widget, it reports that every Facebook tab uses between 20 and 25 MB... talk about being an absolute "pig"... Murga Puppy tabs are much smaller (but I thought still larger than they should be)

Oh, and I had recently "reset firefox", then uninstalled FF, and then reinstalled FF to wipe any residual crud that might be causing problems. Didn't seem to help -- the stuff being loaded is apparently default FF operation (which I suppose brings us to a question of compatibility with various bits of hardware -- maybe it needs that to compensate).

Maybe it's time to swap in that newer machine, with 2 GB RAM -- it has "XP Media Edition" :lol: :lol: :lol:

Now that I think about it, I upgraded the RAM in that machine for those folks, because their normal browser was reducing the machine to its knees (that was IE, not FF) -- they were having trouble reaching their email as a result. When I put FF on their machine, it worked "OK", whereas IE barely worked at all... :roll:
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=58615]Add swapfile[/url]
[url=http://wellminded.net63.net/]WellMinded Search[/url]
[url=http://puppylinux.us/psearch.html]PuppyLinux.US Search[/url]

Post Reply