ThinSlacko - March 2013 (deltas released May 2013)

For talk and support relating specifically to Puppy derivatives
Message
Author
User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

Re: Broadcom wl driver

#21 Post by peebee »

01micko wrote:
peebee wrote:Broadcom wl driver

for ThinSlacko 5.5.01 is available:

here
Did the sfs load ok in pfix=ram? (I saw your failure in PHAT)
Thanks for the drivers!
No problems on ThinSlacko......with or without the a-drive - I tested both.
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

User avatar
greengeek
Posts: 5789
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2010, 09:34
Location: Republic of Novo Zelande

#22 Post by greengeek »

01micko wrote:try:

Code: Select all

puppy pfix=ram nouveau,noaccel=1
puppy pfix=ram nouveau,modeset=0
Neither worked unfortunately...however, maybe I'm using the parameters in a different way to what you intended? I am simply appending each one to the kernel line of the menu.lst stanza:

Code: Select all

# Linux bootable partition config begins
title thinslackonewGZ frugal in sda1 dir thinslackonewGZ
rootnoverify (hd0,0)
kernel /thinslackonewGZ/vmlinuz pmedia=atahd psubdir=thinslackonewGZ pfix=ram nouveau,noaccel=1
initrd /thinslackonewGZ/initrd.gz
# Linux bootable partition config ends
(now that I think about it I have no savefile anyway...)

Maybe this would work differently when entering the code manually when booting Live from a CD?

I have another "identical" laptop which seems to work better than this one for some reason so will make some comparisons and post back if I have no joy. Thanks for the suggestions.

EDIT : Solution for my problem is here:
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic. ... 021#706021
Last edited by greengeek on Mon 02 Nov 2015, 13:24, edited 1 time in total.

Adagio

#23 Post by Adagio »

Heh, what fun using Links browser.
It has improved a bit since I last used it in another lifetime.

Using it now, it makes the appearance of the forum more bearable.

User avatar
Q5sys
Posts: 1105
Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008, 19:49
Contact:

Re: ThinSlacko - March 2013

#24 Post by Q5sys »

01micko wrote:This is Slacko designed for slightly older kit. It should run fine on a PIII 600MHz with 256MB RAM, or even lower specs. Flies on fast kit.
Do you think it could run on my Libretto 50ct?
I can overclock it to 166mhz... but I havent yet.
Specs attached.
Attachments
libretto_50_e.pdf-2.jpg
(169.45 KiB) Downloaded 534 times
libretto_50_e.pdf-1.jpg
(109.26 KiB) Downloaded 538 times

starhawk
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2010, 06:04
Location: Everybody knows this is nowhere...

#25 Post by starhawk »

Q5sys, I've sent you a PM.

User avatar
01micko
Posts: 8741
Joined: Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:39
Location: qld
Contact:

Re: ThinSlacko - March 2013

#26 Post by 01micko »

Q5sys wrote:
01micko wrote:This is Slacko designed for slightly older kit. It should run fine on a PIII 600MHz with 256MB RAM, or even lower specs. Flies on fast kit.
Do you think it could run on my Libretto 50ct?
I can overclock it to 166mhz... but I havent yet.
Specs attached.
No, don't think so.
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#27 Post by James C »

Still doing fine on my Athlon XP box. :)

Only real thing I've had to do was a bit of tweaking to get some smaller fonts.... otherwise smooth sailing.
Attachments
5.5.01.jpg
(49.08 KiB) Downloaded 1067 times

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 4370
Joined: Sun 21 Sep 2008, 12:31
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:

#28 Post by peebee »

Hi Mick

There is a library: libstartup-notification-1.so

that is present in Slacko 5.5 and in PhatSlacko but isn't included in either sfs for ThinSlacko.....

It's not very big so if it could be included for consistency in the main ThinSlacko sfs in a future version that would be great.

Cheers
PeeBee
ImageLxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64

User avatar
01micko
Posts: 8741
Joined: Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:39
Location: qld
Contact:

#29 Post by 01micko »

peebee wrote:Hi Mick

There is a library: libstartup-notification-1.so

that is present in Slacko 5.5 and in PhatSlacko but isn't included in either sfs for ThinSlacko.....

It's not very big so if it could be included for consistency in the main ThinSlacko sfs in a future version that would be great.

Cheers
PeeBee
Well the main sfs will rather shrink than grow :wink:

Maybe it can go to adrive.
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access

lemmy999
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat 12 Jan 2008, 16:52

#30 Post by lemmy999 »

Hi Mick

Nice Pup. Installed nicely onto my EEEPC 1000HG. On the way out it created a savefile ( as you'd expect). On reboot I installed Chromium from PPM. Ran into the usual "running Chrome as root" issue. On exit it prompted me ( again) to create a savefile??. Definitely something not right.

On my next boot Chromium was totally missing!!

Any thoughts?

User avatar
01micko
Posts: 8741
Joined: Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:39
Location: qld
Contact:

#31 Post by 01micko »

lemmy999 wrote:Nice Pup. Installed nicely onto my EEEPC 1000HG. On the way out it created a savefile ( as you'd expect). On reboot I installed Chromium from PPM. Ran into the usual "running Chrome as root" issue. On exit it prompted me ( again) to create a savefile??. Definitely something not right.
Looks like the savefile isn't being found at boot. How exactly did you install? Where is the save file in relation to the other files? (vmlinuz, initrd.gz, puppy_slacko_5.5.01.sfs)
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access

lemmy999
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat 12 Jan 2008, 16:52

#32 Post by lemmy999 »

I installed using the Puppy Universal installer. The savefile resides on a different partition.

Guess that may answer my question- partition isn't mounted until after Puppy boots and therefore the savefile isn't going to be visible. I'll try making a savefile within the Puppy partition and see if it makes any difference.

User avatar
01micko
Posts: 8741
Joined: Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:39
Location: qld
Contact:

Re: NM10

#33 Post by 01micko »

raffy wrote:On Intel NM10 laptop with 1024x600 screen, direct rendering works at 175 fps (glxgears). However, xorgwizard has to be commanded at first boot to get into X (same with PHATslacko).

Did not see VLC, so installed it via PPM/puppy-slacko14 together with ffmpeg. When playing video full-screen, load gets to as high as 85% CPU utilization (only 75% in PHATlacko).

Had to reboot 2x to use adrv (is this correct?).

Thanks, Micko.
Hi raffy,

First, adrive should load on first boot. It must be in the same location as the other puppy files (see example I offered lemmy999 above). Also, xorgwizard is probably to be expected for these machines. I tried to get them going to desktop but I think something is missing. I do not have access to one for tests. All feedback has been from JustGreg, and great his help was too.

Second, I have no idea why cpu usage for VLC is higher in Thin than PHAT, but I do know why it is high for your machine. It's to do with the lack of an accelerated video driver for your machine (see tempestuous' explanantion, mention of lousy MPlayer performance). Also, the cpu is a bit of an underperformer for a newish device.

HTH
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access

User avatar
pemasu
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed 08 Jul 2009, 12:26
Location: Finland

#34 Post by pemasu »

Some proprietary graphics drivers for ThinSlacko. Catalyst and Nvidia.

http://www.smokey01.com/pemasu/spup/

User avatar
Smithy
Posts: 1151
Joined: Mon 12 Dec 2011, 11:17

Mouse hover

#35 Post by Smithy »

Seems quite zippy this distro!

Any way of changing the icon when the mouse hovers over close boxes and the like? where does it live? Gbdfed, xcur2png, cursor.pcf all draw a blank.
It's the "glyph"(s) I would like to change.

scsijon
Posts: 1596
Joined: Thu 24 May 2007, 03:59
Location: the australian mallee
Contact:

Re: Mouse hover

#36 Post by scsijon »

Smithy wrote:Seems quite zippy this distro!

Any way of changing the icon when the mouse hovers over close boxes and the like? where does it live? Gbdfed, xcur2png, cursor.pcf all draw a blank.
It's the "glyph"(s) I would like to change.
@Smithy If you mean the change mouse to the minimize/maximize/close window buttons, it's inside the newer jwm's. For updating other builds the jwm thread is here http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=83949

@01micko Looks loke a Very nice build, got an old laptop i'm going to try it on as it may resurect it with later than puppy 2.12. but it does only have 256meg ram.

User avatar
Smithy
Posts: 1151
Joined: Mon 12 Dec 2011, 11:17

#37 Post by Smithy »

Not sure scsijon, looked around JWM, nothing in there to change what I mean.
When the mouse moves over a close (X) box, a tiny transparent thing appears which is a pita 'cos it's a bit too small and easy to miss, plus the minimise and maximise glyphs,bitmaps or whatever they are, are a bit too small as well. The mouse arrow is fine.

scsijon
Posts: 1596
Joined: Thu 24 May 2007, 03:59
Location: the australian mallee
Contact:

#38 Post by scsijon »

Smithy wrote:Not sure scsijon, looked around JWM, nothing in there to change what I mean.
When the mouse moves over a close (X) box, a tiny transparent thing appears which is a pita 'cos it's a bit too small and easy to miss, plus the minimise and maximise glyphs,bitmaps or whatever they are, are a bit too small as well. The mouse arrow is fine.
Sorry, it's 'discussed' in the jwm thread that he has changed the way the mouse 'symbols' now work. Basically, they are now controlled by a component of linux, not a overlay symbol as was with earlier done. It speeds things up and makes code easier to work with, therefore enabling other improvements that have been added. There is no intention to revert.

regards
scsijon

User avatar
Smithy
Posts: 1151
Joined: Mon 12 Dec 2011, 11:17

#39 Post by Smithy »

Fair enough. Thanks for the explanation, I thought it might be some Linux routine.

User avatar
`f00
Posts: 807
Joined: Thu 06 Nov 2008, 19:13
Location: the Western Reserve

#40 Post by `f00 »

@Smithy - yeah, the default cursor set in most pups looks a bit odd with the new jwm hover feature for titlebar buttons. If you compile jwm, you can redo the mapping (some like all titlebar buttons to show left_ptr on hover) in the src/cursor.c if I recall that bit.

The other option is to use a different cursor set - Neutral Plus Inverted is one that renders the jwm hovers well and a bit more intuitive in my opinion. NPI is part of lightcursorpack-1.0.pet, which likely will work in ThinSlacko (I made a custom cursor set using mostly NPI with some bits of aerodrop and it works fine in slacko55).

hope that helps?
Attachments
jwm-npi.png
jwm titlebar button hover with NPI cursor set - cursorscreeny by tas :)
(e16 uses its own specialized cursor set)
(14.91 KiB) Downloaded 866 times

Post Reply