5 years

News, happenings
Message
Author
jpeps
Posts: 3179
Joined: Sat 31 May 2008, 19:00

#61 Post by jpeps »

puppyluvr wrote::D Hello,
Please elaborate?
I`m seriously curious...
Already did, a few posts up. Obviously, it depends on what you're running..what if you're running a server? In my own case, a dell with one gig, a swap file just allowed me to watch an hour long webcast. Without out, the computer freezes in about 10 minutes...requiring a reboot. The video stalled out a few times, but the sound kept going and it restored itself. Swap will restore otherwise lost data.

gcmartin: well said!

User avatar
greengeek
Posts: 5789
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2010, 09:34
Location: Republic of Novo Zelande

#62 Post by greengeek »

gcmartin wrote:have you investigated the possibility that someone somewhere in your community is throwing out an old computer that is newer and better equipped.
Its a bad personality trait of mine that I can't stand throwing something out if I can modify it to do something useful. Throwing out an old laptop just so I could replace it with a newer one would be like losing a bit of my soul. I just KNOW that there must be some good purpose I can use my old laptops for. (one is destined to be a home fileserver and I will never give up the search to do something useful with the others...)
If you have some problems finding old PUPs for the 192MB PC you have, let me know and I will send you several of the older ISO of older PUPs which were designed for your PC.
Thanks for that. I have seen a list that I think Catdude put together of older pups, and I am gradually trialling some of them. I'm quite taken by how capable some of them are - although I find there is enormous variation between how well each performs on my various Toshiba lappys. Many just wont load at all. It is my long term goal to make/build/tailor/find the right pup, the right xorg, and the right apps for each machine so that each one serves some good purpose.

I might even strip the guts out of one and refill it with newer internals - a model T Ford with Lamborghini drivetrain :-)

Thanks for the suggestion about trying larger memory modules - I will push the boundaries and see what I come up with.

User avatar
sunburnt
Posts: 5090
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2005, 23:11
Location: Arizona, U.S.A.

#63 Post by sunburnt »

And of course no one is suggesting a PC with less than 2GB doesn`t need a swap.
This is all depending on use ( of course...).
Average home browsers can do with less, power users and office suites need more.
I`d say run what you usually use, and if there`s 1GB+ ram free, then no swap.

puppyluvr; A normal swap`s about 2x the ram size, you could also use 2GB.

Except in my case where I have very little ram, so bigger swap.
I`m writing this on an old Celeron with 500MB of ram with a 2GB swap.


### A ram usage meter in the tray would obviously be a big help.
......... Then as apps. are opened you could keep track of free space.
.

User avatar
ttuuxxx
Posts: 11171
Joined: Sat 05 May 2007, 10:00
Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia
Contact:

#64 Post by ttuuxxx »

Congrads puppyluvr on the 5 great years, hope to see you around for many, many more :)
ttuuxxx
http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)

User avatar
puppyluvr
Posts: 3470
Joined: Sun 06 Jan 2008, 23:14
Location: Chickasha Oklahoma
Contact:

#65 Post by puppyluvr »

:D Hello,
First, thank you Ttuuxxx, I shall certainly try. :wink:
I am glad to see you, I was afraid 'life' was gonna take you from us. :cry:
The 'real world' can be so demanding, and has no GUI.

I have always thought the recommendation was 1/2 your actual ram for swap, but that could be outdated..
But I was not making a point, I was proposing a question.
:?: Considering all the above, does a newer 2+gb ram machine, for the average user, really need a swap? It it becoming a 'Wary' sort of thing, for <1gb machines, or does the swap still serve a valuable purpose..
My machine, with 2gb, seems to never touch the swap, but I can peg the 2.16ghz processor much too easily.....
But power increases in the order of magnitudes about every year..
So I just wondered if it is about to go the way of the cassette 'drive'...
Close the Windows, and open your eyes, to a whole new world
I am Lead Dog of the
Puppy Linux Users Group on Facebook
Join us!

Puppy since 2.15CE...

User avatar
puppyluvr
Posts: 3470
Joined: Sun 06 Jan 2008, 23:14
Location: Chickasha Oklahoma
Contact:

#66 Post by puppyluvr »

:D Hello,
To drift back OT..
In the last 5 years, I have "wasted" a lot of time on Puppy Linux..
It has effected 'real life' as much as 'real life' has effected my time for it...
I look at how Puppy has impacted me...
Then I look at how I have impacted Puppy..
I`m a hack.. 8)
Coding, for my dyslexic brain, it taxing beyond belief, but then so is texting..... :oops:
But I can look at Puppy, and see things, things that started out as my attempts at contributing, and became the pet projects, if not outright obsessions, of those with more time, and often more skill, than I can offer..
I mean really, 1/4 of a million people have D/L an Opera skin called Puppy Blues, that clearly says..
For Puppy Linux Users.
That blows my mind.... :shock:
My point, I guess, is that everyone can contribute, everyone can have an impact, because although your execution may not be perfect, your idea may turn out to be useful... What you dream up, others might make real...
As I said, It takes a village...
I take the GPL seriously, so anything I do, I not only consent, but hope, that others will take, use, improve, share....
But for Puppy itself......we still need a sandbox...... :D
Somewhere that ideas can be explored, beyond 'credit' and personal claim, where we can all present options, ideas, skilled suggestions..
I can make something interesting, he can make something interesting, she can make something interesting..
But together WE can make something AMAZING...
That is how, after 5 years, I see the GPL, Linux, and Puppy...
Close the Windows, and open your eyes, to a whole new world
I am Lead Dog of the
Puppy Linux Users Group on Facebook
Join us!

Puppy since 2.15CE...

Dewbie

#67 Post by Dewbie »

@puppyluvr:
For what it's worth, on my PII/350 Deskpro, 2.14x will use swap even when there's still plenty of RAM available.

4.x and Wary won't touch swap unless all the RAM is used.

User avatar
puppyluvr
Posts: 3470
Joined: Sun 06 Jan 2008, 23:14
Location: Chickasha Oklahoma
Contact:

#68 Post by puppyluvr »

:D Hello,
Dewbie, that is really interesting.. I have a lot of older Pups, and will definitely check that out.
Wonder why that would be...
Maybe a kernel thing...
Close the Windows, and open your eyes, to a whole new world
I am Lead Dog of the
Puppy Linux Users Group on Facebook
Join us!

Puppy since 2.15CE...

gcmartin

SWAP does not negatively impact overall system performance

#69 Post by gcmartin »

This may be helpful.

Puppy has had several differing memory models at play over its play. Linux has made changes and those have been cascaded in the differing distros in Puppyland.

I run Live media (meaning: all system/subsytem operations start and end on the booted CD/DVD) for most of my "production" Puppy use. I call it "production" when I find a distro which provides all that I need-use and it is stable. So for example, I have 3 PCs and 1 laptop that are always on and almost never rebooted.

This is done by selecting, then testing a distro of interest. When I find it matches need, I add all of the subsystems needed. Then, I will save-session changes to DVD and reboot. Once all desktop customization is completed, I will make a "final" reboot saving session and the machine usually runs for many months.

I have seen RAM usages differences, say, with FATDOG5.2 versus newest FATDOG6.11. I have seen this in other PUPs as well; see here.. In that thread, I shared RAM use findings regarding both Slacko and Exprimo.

For me, my best behavior has been derived from looking at the Unix/Linux info I could find on the web about Linux task model, its scheduler, and its I/O and memory management. It gave me a level of understanding its makeup and structure. But, I have also come to understand that RAM use is NOT consistent across PUPs, suggesting that there are various things in a distro's design that will be usefully brought into play.

Puppy is intriguing for several reason. And, over the past 4 years there have been several changes which affect RAM needs for operation.

Without getting into a very lengthy discussion on what all this means, I reduce it down to taking the advice and approach that has been shared by the many Unix/Linux sessions I have attended over the years. And, since being a member in Puppyland, I have found that on more than 1 occasion, that the advice to have a physical swap has been useful even on my 4GB PCs. I've seen this in Puppy reports and via some select terminal commands.

Even though some may differ with my observations, I have NOT seen any loss of performance because any system I've run has a swap file. I take this, ALSO, to mean that it provides observed stability.

Over the years, even though I have not posted, I have noticed changes in RAM use. I believe this is due to both kernel releases, kernel building and packaging.

Here to help
Last edited by gcmartin on Sat 12 Jan 2013, 19:29, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
sunburnt
Posts: 5090
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2005, 23:11
Location: Arizona, U.S.A.

#70 Post by sunburnt »

gcmartin; I agree, like hardware there can be vast differences in O.S.s.
The initrdfs and swap are added cpu load, a slow PC will show it.
Sadly the slow older PCs are the ones that are short on ram. Catch-22 !

Running a swap is certainly the safest method of PC operations.
However I`ve done without a swap for years ( with 1 GB or more of ram ).

The effect of running out of ram is sudden and fatal ( a tray meter is good ).
Linux has no warning of low ram that I`ve noticed ( an alert`s easily made ).

Dewbie

#71 Post by Dewbie »

puppyluvr wrote:
:D Hello,
Dewbie, that is really interesting.. I have a lot of older Pups, and will definitely check that out.
Wonder why that would be...
Maybe a kernel thing...

Retro-Puppy 218 alpha (main version) is Woof-built with k2.6.18.8 (vs. 2.14x's non-Woof k2.6.18.1).

Swap-wise, Retro-Puppy 218 alpha behaves like 4.x and Wary, so it might be build-related (vs. kernel-related).
(Be warned, it's quite buggy. :shock: )

I haven't tried the original-kernel version of Retro-Puppy 218 alpha (k2.6.18.1, just like 2.14x) because it lacks a needed driver. :(

User avatar
Colonel Panic
Posts: 2171
Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09

#72 Post by Colonel Panic »

ttuuxxx wrote:Congrads puppyluvr on the 5 great years, hope to see you around for many, many more :)
ttuuxxx
Seconded (or at least as long as you enjoy it and can spare the time).

Six and a half years of Puppying for me. I was given a secondhand computer (my previous one) in April 2006, and found that in addition to a 15 GB Windows XP partition it also had 5 GB of free space at the back of the drive (just as well, because back then I wouldn't have known how to resize the XP partition).

I put the then latest version of Vector, 5.1, on that space and used it happily for a couple of months until the internet connection mysteriously died (I never found out why).

Having read about Puppy and being keen to try it I downloaded and burnt off a copy of Puppy 2.00 with Seamonkey - you had a choice of browser back then, it was that or Opera - at the local library in June 2006, and for the next three months Puppy was my only way of getting online at home apart from XP, which ran a lot more slowly than Puppy on a machine with only 256 MB of RAM and tended to "bog down".

I tried one or two other Puppies, such as 2.14, but the next ones I was really taken with were PizzaPup 3.01, and then 4.20 / 4.21 and its variants such as TurboPup, in 2008. I think I was hooked from then on :).
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.

Caneri
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue 04 Sep 2007, 13:23
Location: Canada

#73 Post by Caneri »

Hiya Guitarman,

I was wondering if you still had that luscious shot of the legs that made a perfect arse of themselves.....yummy. I never got the hi-res version though....drats

Many happy thoughts to you and yours...good work as well...Eric
[color=darkred][i]Be not afraid to grow slowly, only be afraid of standing still.[/i]
Chinese Proverb[/color]

User avatar
e_mattis
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri 21 Dec 2012, 02:24
Location: Williamston, SC
Contact:

#74 Post by e_mattis »

I see i'm late (as usual) getting to the party, but Happy pup-day! there luvr. and thanks for your much appreciated talent and contributions. Hope there are many more to come!

User avatar
puppyluvr
Posts: 3470
Joined: Sun 06 Jan 2008, 23:14
Location: Chickasha Oklahoma
Contact:

#75 Post by puppyluvr »

:D Hello,
No talent involved.. Just the realization....
Boot "pfix=ram" and Puppy is indestructible..
Hack and slay, learn as you destroy, and "assimilate"......
Save the mess, open it later from another Pup, and see where it went wrong..
I cant book learn, I`m a "hands on" guy...
So its like a car.. You learn how it works by fixing it..

Except P.A.W. :wink:
That was a lot of work......
Close the Windows, and open your eyes, to a whole new world
I am Lead Dog of the
Puppy Linux Users Group on Facebook
Join us!

Puppy since 2.15CE...

jpeps
Posts: 3179
Joined: Sat 31 May 2008, 19:00

#76 Post by jpeps »

puppyluvr wrote: I cant book learn, I`m a "hands on" guy...
So its like a car.. You learn how it works by fixing it..
You learn by conversing with the best minds, and then doing lots of practice. It's quite easy to learn how to do things incorrectly.

User avatar
01micko
Posts: 8741
Joined: Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:39
Location: qld
Contact:

#77 Post by 01micko »

jpeps wrote:[snip] ..It's quite easy to learn how to do things incorrectly.
...and extremely difficult to "unlearn"...
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access

User avatar
puppyluvr
Posts: 3470
Joined: Sun 06 Jan 2008, 23:14
Location: Chickasha Oklahoma
Contact:

#78 Post by puppyluvr »

:D Hello,
I
t's quite easy to learn how to do things incorrectly.
Agreed..
But.. If I make something, and it doesnt work, I can ask (for example) Mick how to fix it.. (which I have.. THX.).. :D But I just learned HOW, not WHY.. If I rack my brains, read myself silly, and figure it out myself, I learned WHY.. And often much more in the process...
My point was, pfix=ram is an awesome sandbox..
Close the Windows, and open your eyes, to a whole new world
I am Lead Dog of the
Puppy Linux Users Group on Facebook
Join us!

Puppy since 2.15CE...

starhawk
Posts: 4906
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2010, 06:04
Location: Everybody knows this is nowhere...

#79 Post by starhawk »

puppyluvr, I sent you a PM.

jpeps
Posts: 3179
Joined: Sat 31 May 2008, 19:00

#80 Post by jpeps »

puppyluvr wrote: But.. If I make something, and it doesnt work, I can ask (for example) Mick how to fix it.. (which I have.. THX.).. :D But I just learned HOW, not WHY.. If I rack my brains, read myself silly, and figure it out myself, I learned WHY.. And often much more in the process...
I think you just nailed it...apropos the name, Puppy Linux.

Post Reply