Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Mon 22 Dec 2014, 16:12
All times are UTC - 4
 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Misc
Other Distros
Moderators: Flash, JohnMurga
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
Page 58 of 113 [1693 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, ..., 111, 112, 113 Next
Author Message
puppy_apprentice


Joined: 07 Feb 2012
Posts: 135

PostPosted: Sat 15 Dec 2012, 03:29    Post subject:  

@nooby

"So why this instead of Proteus Linux which is the community
version of Slax?"

if you are a curious person u will try them all ;p

and i'm testing Polish version of SLAX and have Polish letters, did u tested Swedish one?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
nooby

Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 10557
Location: SwedenEurope

PostPosted: Sat 15 Dec 2012, 03:49    Post subject:  

D4P much appreciated you did that one.

So Porteus does not allow root?
That surprises I've been active on their forum
some year ago but don't remember details.

_________________
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5973
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Sat 15 Dec 2012, 04:20    Post subject:  

nooby wrote:

So Porteus does not allow root?


Several months ago you were running Porteus as root.......see here
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=604564#604564

The stuff on that entire page should still work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
nooby

Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 10557
Location: SwedenEurope

PostPosted: Sat 15 Dec 2012, 04:37    Post subject:  

Thanks, that is why I felt surprised then.
So maybe something in the set up at D4P
trigger taht it goes into some Live User default?

_________________
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
d4p


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 407

PostPosted: Sun 16 Dec 2012, 00:26    Post subject:  

@Nooby

No root access, maybe frugal install & persistent on NTFS?
or maybe I dont know how to get root?
porteus-noroot.png
 Description   
 Filesize   94.41 KB
 Viewed   751 Time(s)

porteus-noroot.png

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
d4p


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 407

PostPosted: Sun 16 Dec 2012, 00:27    Post subject:  

4m-linux is only 40 Mb.
The supported filesystems are: btrfs, ext2, ext3, ext4, FAT, HFS,
HFS+, jfs, Minix, NTFS, ReiserFS, and XFS.
http://4mlinux.com/news.html
4m5.PNG
Description 
png

 Download 
Filename  4m5.PNG 
Filesize  222.97 KB 
Downloaded  326 Time(s) 
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Colonel Panic


Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 1547

PostPosted: Tue 18 Dec 2012, 07:22    Post subject:  

Just installed WattOS 6, a Ubuntu variant designed for older computers.

I'm impressed for the most part as it looks good and does everything I really need, but unfortunately some of the packages are broken (a common problem with ubuntu-based distros once the version of Ubuntu they're based on gets superseded) so I can't get midnight commander or conky working.

For that reason it's unlikely to be a long term keeper but WattOS 7 will be out Feb or March with any luck. It deserves to succeed if it helps to keep a lot of old machines out of landfill (as does Puppy of course).

BTW, I'm playing Focus's 1974 album "Hamburger Concerto" on Youtube as I type this - great music.

_________________
Stone Pentium IV (2.4 GHz), 2 GB of RAM, 160 GB hard drive running Puppy Legacy OS2.1 LTS, Puppy Precise 5.71 Large, Muppy 008 and Puppy 3.00 Fire Hydrant Inferno.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
starhawk

Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 3210
Location: Everybody knows this is nowhere...

PostPosted: Tue 18 Dec 2012, 12:34    Post subject:  

Heh, WattOS. WattOS is at least partially responsible for introducing me to Puppy. I know I've told this tale before, but I like to tell it, so you folks get to hear a repeat Razz

"A long time ago, on another forum, far, far away" (sorry, George, couldn't resist...) I was turning a thin client into a PC. I needed a lightweight OS because the thin client was older and the hardware specs deplorable at best. (Even brand-new thin clients are generally extraordinarily weak, compared to even most of the stuff that runs Puppy. It's by design -- they do as much as they have to, and not one bit more.) I knew Windows wasn't going to cut it, and I didn't see Ubuntu or any of its variants being nearly light enough. I'd only had experience with that one distro, but I knew there were TONS more.

So I did some asking, and some looking, and I found WattOS and a lot of people recommending this thing called Puppy Linux. I never heard of either one, and the forum had never heard of WattOS (IIRC it was brand new at the time).

I decided to give WattOS a chance first. (To this day, I've no idea why!) So I posted on WattOS' forums, "hey, I need to run a distro off a CF card on a thin client with mondo low specs, can WattOS do that?" Well, OK, the post was a lot more detailed, but that's the essence of it. A week went by and no reply -- so I posted again, spelling out for them in quite thorough detail exactly how much they had to learn about tech support and all that. I'd honestly like to think they've learned (I suspect they have, if they're up to version 6!), but I've never been back to find out.

...to make a long story, well, a little less long (!) ... I put up a post here on this very forum [EDIT: this thread right here] asking if Puppy could do what I want. Boom! Answer within an hour, and if I remember correctly, it was within a half-hour. Either way, it was along the lines of "heck yeah, we can do that!"...

...and the rest, as they say, was history.

Just curious, Colonel... how fast is WattOS compared to, say, Puplite5 or Akita? (A very slightly modified Puplite5 is what went on that thin client!) I imagine, being an Ubuntu derivative, WattOS winds up carrying at least a good percentage of the same bloat... and therefore is far more slow and pudgy than it needs to be.

_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Colonel Panic


Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 1547

PostPosted: Tue 18 Dec 2012, 20:11    Post subject:  

starhawk wrote:
Heh, WattOS. WattOS is at least partially responsible for introducing me to Puppy. I know I've told this tale before, but I like to tell it, so you folks get to hear a repeat Razz

"A long time ago, on another forum, far, far away" (sorry, George, couldn't resist...) I was turning a thin client into a PC. I needed a lightweight OS because the thin client was older and the hardware specs deplorable at best. (Even brand-new thin clients are generally extraordinarily weak, compared to even most of the stuff that runs Puppy. It's by design -- they do as much as they have to, and not one bit more.) I knew Windows wasn't going to cut it, and I didn't see Ubuntu or any of its variants being nearly light enough. I'd only had experience with that one distro, but I knew there were TONS more.

So I did some asking, and some looking, and I found WattOS and a lot of people recommending this thing called Puppy Linux. I never heard of either one, and the forum had never heard of WattOS (IIRC it was brand new at the time).

I decided to give WattOS a chance first. (To this day, I've no idea why!) So I posted on WattOS' forums, "hey, I need to run a distro off a CF card on a thin client with mondo low specs, can WattOS do that?" Well, OK, the post was a lot more detailed, but that's the essence of it. A week went by and no reply -- so I posted again, spelling out for them in quite thorough detail exactly how much they had to learn about tech support and all that. I'd honestly like to think they've learned (I suspect they have, if they're up to version 6!), but I've never been back to find out.

...to make a long story, well, a little less long (!) ... I put up a post here on this very forum [EDIT: this thread right here] asking if Puppy could do what I want. Boom! Answer within an hour, and if I remember correctly, it was within a half-hour. Either way, it was along the lines of "heck yeah, we can do that!"...

...and the rest, as they say, was history.

Just curious, Colonel... how fast is WattOS compared to, say, Puplite5 or Akita? (A very slightly modified Puplite5 is what went on that thin client!) I imagine, being an Ubuntu derivative, WattOS winds up carrying at least a good percentage of the same bloat... and therefore is far more slow and pudgy than it needs to be.


Hi starhawk,

I only really notice if things are extremely fast or slow, but I'd say WattOS is fast enough for a Pentium 4 (which mine is, bearing in mind that all its apps are lightweight ones by design). Abiword opens in about three or four seconds on my machine and Gnumeric almost instantly when Abiword is open.

I haven't tried Akita on this machine but I'd guess it's about the same as WattOS. I don't know Puplite, sorry.

As I said though, at the moment it seems like several packages in WattOS are broken, which is a shame.

_________________
Stone Pentium IV (2.4 GHz), 2 GB of RAM, 160 GB hard drive running Puppy Legacy OS2.1 LTS, Puppy Precise 5.71 Large, Muppy 008 and Puppy 3.00 Fire Hydrant Inferno.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
starhawk

Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 3210
Location: Everybody knows this is nowhere...

PostPosted: Tue 18 Dec 2012, 21:23    Post subject:  

One more WattOS question: are the packages broken right away, or does it try to update, fail badly, and break everything as a result?
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5973
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Wed 19 Dec 2012, 01:57    Post subject:  

Just messing with Sid........

Code:
Wed Dec 19 13:57:21 CST 2012
bbq@bbq:~$ uname -r
3.7-1.towo-siduction-686
bbq@bbq:~$
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
bark_bark_bark

Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 937
Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed 19 Dec 2012, 09:30    Post subject:  

I always wanted to try Debian, but it comes on 8 DVDs. That's 8 DVDs I don't have. I never really write DVDs.
_________________
......
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
nitehawk


Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 540
Location: West Central Florida

PostPosted: Wed 19 Dec 2012, 18:45    Post subject:  

bark_bark_bark wrote:
I always wanted to try Debian, but it comes on 8 DVDs. That's 8 DVDs I don't have. I never really write DVDs.


...Yes,..and now I read where Wheezy will be coming out on 11 DVDs!!!! ELEVEN!
I used to use Debian a lot,...and would get the DVDs ('cause I'm still on dialup). Lenny only had 4 DVDs,...and was super-nice. I peeled out the extra $$$ for the 8 Squeeze DVDs,.....but NO WAY am I gonna go for 11 DVDs.

I took an old 20 Gig hard drive I had,....and loaded it with Lenny and ALL the games that Lenny and Squeeze had on their DVDs for my grandson. I simply switch out my 160 Gig hard drive for the old 20 G ...when the grandson comes over. Now I can use whatever linux distro I want,....and he can get all his linux games he wants, as well. (Another old computer is loaded with W2k,...and about 100 or so old windows and old dos games for him).

Naw,....no more Debian for me, it seems. Too many DVDs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Colonel Panic


Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 1547

PostPosted: Wed 19 Dec 2012, 19:55    Post subject:  

starhawk wrote:
One more WattOS question: are the packages broken right away, or does it try to update, fail badly, and break everything as a result?


Well, good news on that front. I've removed gkrellm now and the programs that weren't installing before have since installed just fine Smile

I'm still aware that I know a lot less about Debian- and Ubuntu-based distros than Slack-based ones though (how to locate and enable appropriate repos, for example). Still, it's all working now.

_________________
Stone Pentium IV (2.4 GHz), 2 GB of RAM, 160 GB hard drive running Puppy Legacy OS2.1 LTS, Puppy Precise 5.71 Large, Muppy 008 and Puppy 3.00 Fire Hydrant Inferno.

Last edited by Colonel Panic on Sun 30 Dec 2012, 19:03; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
rokytnji


Joined: 20 Jan 2009
Posts: 1500
Location: Pecos/ Texas

PostPosted: Wed 19 Dec 2012, 21:06    Post subject:  

James C wrote:
Just messing with Sid........

Code:
Wed Dec 19 13:57:21 CST 2012
bbq@bbq:~$ uname -r
3.7-1.towo-siduction-686
bbq@bbq:~$


Just messing with AntiX

Code:
$ uname -r
3.7.1-antix.2-amd64-smp
$ cat /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid"
NAME="Debian GNU/Linux"
ID=debian
ANSI_COLOR="1;31"


Iso was 300MB for Base. 64bit also.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 58 of 113 [1693 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, ..., 111, 112, 113 Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » Taking the Puppy out for a walk » Misc
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.1037s ][ Queries: 13 (0.0108s) ][ GZIP on ]