Author |
Message |
splot

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Posts: 35
|
Posted: Sat 11 Aug 2012, 18:26 Post subject:
|
|
Not good news at all.
I have just tried your .sfs and got a new error.
Quote: | Your input can't be opened:
VLC is unable to open the MRL 'dvb://'. Check the log for details. |
It is missing 'TV (digital)' from Capture Devices.
It seems that some tuners work as 'PVR' but not mine.
Tried pemasu's latest .pet, same error as earlier.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
pemasu

Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Posts: 5484 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Sat 11 Aug 2012, 18:28 Post subject:
|
|
Did you install libdvbpsi7. If not then the error message is due to that. I can confirm that dvb works with Billtoo`s vlc compile. Use PPM and install libdvbpsi7.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
oldyeller

Joined: 15 Nov 2011 Posts: 888 Location: Alaska
|
Posted: Sat 11 Aug 2012, 18:39 Post subject:
|
|
OK I got ny usb drive going so at least I can work on woof and update the project just can't test it for now anyway
Cheers
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
oldyeller

Joined: 15 Nov 2011 Posts: 888 Location: Alaska
|
Posted: Sat 11 Aug 2012, 19:23 Post subject:
|
|
I removed the test iso. we are back in business I now am able to test my builds again before uploading and posting
Cheers
Last edited by oldyeller on Sun 12 Aug 2012, 13:48; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
splot

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Posts: 35
|
Posted: Sat 11 Aug 2012, 21:22 Post subject:
|
|
So happy to report that I now have a working DVBT.
Bye bye to Ubuntu.
Thank you all so much for your help.
happy-happy-happy
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
oldyeller

Joined: 15 Nov 2011 Posts: 888 Location: Alaska
|
Posted: Sat 11 Aug 2012, 21:36 Post subject:
|
|
splot wrote: | So happy to report that I now have a working DVBT.
Bye bye to Ubuntu.
Thank you all so much for your help.
happy-happy-happy |
I am glad pemasu and Billtoo where to help you
Cheers
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Eyes-Only

Joined: 10 Aug 2006 Posts: 1046 Location: La Confederation Abenaquaise
|
Posted: Sun 12 Aug 2012, 08:18 Post subject:
|
|
I am so very sorry to read of your current dilemma Old yeller! What terrible luck indeed! And after all you do for us around here for the Puppy Community at large - and then to have this disaster happen. I wish I were not in such dire financial straits myself as I'd love nothing more than to help you out of your situation.
Unfortunately all I'm able to do at this time is to wish you the very best of luck and hope for the best. When one is on rock-bottom Oldyeller there is no where else to go but up, eh?
Best of luck my friend,
Eyes-Only
"L'Peau-Rouge"
_________________ *~*~*~*~*~*
Proud user of LXpup and 3-Headed Dog.
*~*~*~*~*~*
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
oldyeller

Joined: 15 Nov 2011 Posts: 888 Location: Alaska
|
Posted: Sun 12 Aug 2012, 11:45 Post subject:
|
|
Eyes-Only wrote: | I am so very sorry to read of your current dilemma Old yeller! What terrible luck indeed! And after all you do for us around here for the Puppy Community at large - and then to have this disaster happen. I wish I were not in such dire financial straits myself as I'd love nothing more than to help you out of your situation.
Unfortunately all I'm able to do at this time is to wish you the very best of luck and hope for the best. When one is on rock-bottom Oldyeller there is no where else to go but up, eh?
Best of luck my friend,
Eyes-Only
"L'Peau-Rouge" |
Thank you. I remember I read a post about doing a frugal install without burning a iso is I can find it again than I can test my builds before posting.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
oldyeller

Joined: 15 Nov 2011 Posts: 888 Location: Alaska
|
Posted: Sun 12 Aug 2012, 13:52 Post subject:
|
|
Hello everyone
I now am able to test my builds again. I found script by stu90 for automated frugal installshttp://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=65266.
check it out my never need to burn another iso unless you want to
Thanks stu90
Cheers
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
scabz

Joined: 30 Apr 2009 Posts: 366 Location: Tallahassee FL US
|
Posted: Mon 13 Aug 2012, 13:25 Post subject:
|
|
Just tested your last ISO it is working wonderfully.
installed devx_precise_5.2.60.sfs, kernel_src-3.2.18-patched.sfs, and NVIDIA-Linux-x86-295.71.run
-Display-
Resolution : 1440x900 pixels
Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
Version : 1.11.3
-OpenGL-
Vendor : NVIDIA Corporation
Renderer : GeForce GT 520/PCIe/SSE2/3DNOW!
Version : 4.2.0 NVIDIA 295.71
Direct Rendering : Yes
# glxgears
33243 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6648.463 FPS
34829 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6965.747 FPS
34720 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6943.882 FPS
34858 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6971.459 FPS
34801 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6960.051 FPS
#
Pets i installed =
* Google-Chrome 19 stable
* PupClockset-1.9.2.pet
* PupSnap-1.8_Scrot-0.8_32Bit.pet
* PupControl-2.2.pet
* PupsaveHotBackup-1.3.pet
* desksetup-0.4.pet
* Bluestep_Humanity.pet
All of the above Pets seem to be working great.
CPU Frequency Scaling Tool is not working correctly, see pic below.
Is there a version of QT we are going to stick with, so that all apps can be compiled against the same QT?
Thanks to everyone that has worked on this, I am off to start compiling now.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
James C

Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Posts: 6717 Location: Kentucky
|
Posted: Tue 14 Aug 2012, 06:36 Post subject:
|
|
First off, last release is working well here.Seems pretty solid.
But, since I won't use those silly PAE kernels.........
-Version-
Kernel : Linux 3.3.6 (i686)
Compiled : #1 SMP Tue Aug 14 02:50:26 CDT 2012
C Library : GNU C Library version 2.15 (stable)
Default C Compiler : Unknown
Distribution : Unknown distribution
-Computer-
Processor : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
Memory : 1034MB (200MB used)
Operating System : Unknown distribution
User Name : root (root)
Date/Time : Tue 14 Aug 2012 05:31:45 AM CDT
-Display-
Resolution : 1440x900 pixels
OpenGL Renderer : Mesa DRI nv18 x86/MMX+/3DNow!+/SSE
X11 Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
-Multimedia-
Audio Adapter : VIA8233 - VIA 8235
Can't decide between the long term 3.2.27 or the latest 3.5.1.......thoughts?
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
oldyeller

Joined: 15 Nov 2011 Posts: 888 Location: Alaska
|
Posted: Tue 14 Aug 2012, 10:22 Post subject:
|
|
scabz wrote: | Just tested your last ISO it is working wonderfully.
installed devx_precise_5.2.60.sfs, kernel_src-3.2.18-patched.sfs, and NVIDIA-Linux-x86-295.71.run
-Display-
Resolution : 1440x900 pixels
Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
Version : 1.11.3
-OpenGL-
Vendor : NVIDIA Corporation
Renderer : GeForce GT 520/PCIe/SSE2/3DNOW!
Version : 4.2.0 NVIDIA 295.71
Direct Rendering : Yes
# glxgears
33243 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6648.463 FPS
34829 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6965.747 FPS
34720 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6943.882 FPS
34858 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6971.459 FPS
34801 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6960.051 FPS
#
Pets i installed =
* Google-Chrome 19 stable
* PupClockset-1.9.2.pet
* PupSnap-1.8_Scrot-0.8_32Bit.pet
* PupControl-2.2.pet
* PupsaveHotBackup-1.3.pet
* desksetup-0.4.pet
* Bluestep_Humanity.pet
All of the above Pets seem to be working great.
CPU Frequency Scaling Tool is not working correctly, see pic below.
Is there a version of QT we are going to stick with, so that all apps can be compiled against the same QT?
Thanks to everyone that has worked on this, I am off to start compiling now. |
Not sure how the CPU Frequency Scalling tool works. Does anyone have anyidea what is wrong so can get it fixed
James C
I would go for the longterm, How is it working in precise? if it is stable I could put it in the build instead of the pae kernel.
what are your thoughts or anybody else can put in on this subject.
How is Geany working for everyone it is doing good for me
Description |
|

Download |
Filename |
geany.jpg |
Filesize |
117.87 KB |
Downloaded |
297 Time(s) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
James C

Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Posts: 6717 Location: Kentucky
|
Posted: Tue 14 Aug 2012, 12:06 Post subject:
|
|
oldyeller wrote: |
James C
I would go for the longterm, How is it working in precise? if it is stable I could put it in the build instead of the pae kernel.
|
Seems stable so far.....but I didn't get it compiled till almost 3 am so not a lot of testing.... Or sleep....
Code: | Compiled : #1 SMP Tue Aug 14 02:50:26 CDT 2012 |
Since Ubuntu Precise is using the 3.2 kernel that's the way I'm leaning though.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
oldyeller

Joined: 15 Nov 2011 Posts: 888 Location: Alaska
|
Posted: Tue 14 Aug 2012, 12:38 Post subject:
|
|
James C wrote: | oldyeller wrote: |
James C
I would go for the longterm, How is it working in precise? if it is stable I could put it in the build instead of the pae kernel.
|
Seems stable so far.....but I didn't get it compiled till almost 3 am so not a lot of testing.... Or sleep....
Code: | Compiled : #1 SMP Tue Aug 14 02:50:26 CDT 2012 |
Since Ubuntu Precise is using the 3.2 kernel that's the way I'm leaning though. |
that sounds good to me let me know when you think it would be good to put into a build.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
scabz

Joined: 30 Apr 2009 Posts: 366 Location: Tallahassee FL US
|
Posted: Tue 14 Aug 2012, 12:57 Post subject:
|
|
i just compiled qt-4.8.2 for precise if anyone wants it.
qt-4.8.2 sfs http://www.mediafire.com/?euhoanfqpuhhe33
qt-4.8.2 DEV sfs http://www.mediafire.com/?z5qpcqreiw4dg96
then i compiled umplayer-0.97
umplayer-0.97-i486.pet http://www.mediafire.com/?6d1r3sunk1wn13a
umplayer_DOC-0.97-i486.pet http://www.mediafire.com/?2w226b35odwxxbb
i am off to compile smplayer, smtube, and goggles music manager
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|