The time now is Sun 26 May 2013, 01:18
All times are UTC - 4 |
|
Page 7 of 17 [247 Posts] |
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, ..., 15, 16, 17 Next |
| Author |
Message |
James C
Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 4743
Location: Kentucky
|
 Posted: Sun 17 Jun 2012, 19:10 Post subject:
Re: Firefox 13 does not work |
|
| Jim1911 wrote: | Fresh installation on Dell Inspiron laptop.
Installed Firefox 13 using Fatdog Package Manager. It does not work. I've uninstalled it and reinstalled it several times from different mirrors. Same results. Executing code firefox-spot results in # firefox-spot
sh: /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: No such file or directory Likewise for firefox.
I cannot locate a firefox directory anywhere.
Installation changes Seamonkey icon to Firefox icon, however it opens Seamonkey.
I had a similar problem with my desktop computer installation and attributed that to a bad download. However, I think there is more to it since I get same results from both ibiblio and nluug. It may be better to create a pet from something other than the nightly build.
Otherwise, everything checked on the laptop is working great. |
Hadn't gotten around to reporting it but the same thing happened here.
The Firefox directory is located at /usr/lib64/firefox-13.0/ ..... I just changed the exec line in the desktop file in /usr/share/applications/ to run FF as root.
Download was actually fine but FF wouldn't launch. Editing the desktop file worked here.
Last edited by James C on Sun 17 Jun 2012, 19:12; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jamesbond
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 1542
Location: The Blue Marble
|
| Posted: Sun 17 Jun 2012, 19:12 Post subject:
|
|
| nooby wrote: | Hope it is okay to ask this very naive question.
Ooops seems to be Lupu that is the "culprit"
sorry. I will write in their thread instead.
old now deprecated text.
I am in Lupu 528 now and have set time to CET Central European Time
with Summer displacement so it show the right time.
But after doing a frugal install of FatDog it changed to plus 2 hour extra
so instead of 14.10 it show 16.10 in the old Lupu when I boot into that one
again.
I tried to set up local time in same way on FadDog as I do in Lupu. 14.10
What could have went wrong? On Lupu I have ticked the BIOS Hardware
time should take priority.
Why would that make FatDog shutdown displacing time two hours plus?
I will now reboot from Lupu into Fatdog again and see what happens there
if it shows 14 or 16 so I get back and
Edit from FD. I shows 14.30 so I will boot into Lupu again.
Edit from Lupu. This time it is plus 2 hours without having touched anything
on neither Lupu not on FatDog. So just the fact that I rebooted and chose
Fatdog change the time in BIOS with two hours???
Or what is going on Please a mystery to be solved or a Noob to bash for bad acting  |
Fatdog always uses localtime for the BIOS clock. Other puppies offer possibilities to use either localtime or UTC time in the BIOS clock. To make sure the time stays the same between Lupu and Fatdog, choose "localtime" in Lupu.
This is a design decision - Windows-based machines uses localtime for BIOS clock, so Fatdog uses localtime too to ensure that switching to/from Windows will not accidentally change the time. Of course, by using localtime in BIOS clock, we lose that automatic daylight savings time, but that is an advantage because automatic DST settings doesn't always work
_________________
Fatdog64, Slacko and Puppeee user. Puppy user since 2.13
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
James C
Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 4743
Location: Kentucky
|
| Posted: Sun 17 Jun 2012, 19:23 Post subject:
|
|
Addition to previous post, Package Manager failed to download package list from ibiblio .... so I just used nluug.
| Description |
|
| Filesize |
144.68 KB |
| Viewed |
630 Time(s) |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jamesbond
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 1542
Location: The Blue Marble
|
| Posted: Sun 17 Jun 2012, 19:40 Post subject:
|
|
| James C wrote: | | Addition to previous post, Package Manager failed to download package list from ibiblio .... so I just used nluug. |
I just tested, ibiblio works from here ... perhaps there was random traffic problem just now 
_________________
Fatdog64, Slacko and Puppeee user. Puppy user since 2.13
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Jim1911
Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 2353
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Posted: Sun 17 Jun 2012, 19:42 Post subject:
Re: Firefox 13 does not work |
|
| jamesbond wrote: |
Jim, the screenshot you take shows that the firefox binaries are not installed at all. I just tested it again; the firefox pet is working.
The one that is possibly not working for you is petget installer. If you don't mind, please try this:
1. Edit the file /usr/sbin/silent_petget
2. Goto line 86
3. Near the end of the line, when you see "cpio -p $INSTALL_ROOT", change that to "cpio -up $INSTALL_ROOT"
4. Then try to install firefox again.
Let me know.
cheers! |
Your edit works, posting from Firefox.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jamesbond
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 1542
Location: The Blue Marble
|
| Posted: Sun 17 Jun 2012, 19:53 Post subject:
Re: Firefox 13 does not work |
|
| Jim1911 wrote: | | jamesbond wrote: |
Jim, the screenshot you take shows that the firefox binaries are not installed at all. I just tested it again; the firefox pet is working.
The one that is possibly not working for you is petget installer. If you don't mind, please try this:
1. Edit the file /usr/sbin/silent_petget
2. Goto line 86
3. Near the end of the line, when you see "cpio -p $INSTALL_ROOT", change that to "cpio -up $INSTALL_ROOT"
4. Then try to install firefox again.
Let me know.
cheers! |
Your edit works, posting from Firefox. |
Thank you for testing fix is now included for next release.
_________________
Fatdog64, Slacko and Puppeee user. Puppy user since 2.13
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jamesbond
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 1542
Location: The Blue Marble
|
| Posted: Sun 17 Jun 2012, 20:17 Post subject:
|
|
New 32bit libs based on Slacko 5.3.3 is available now.
Get it from here: http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/fatdog/sfs/600/ or one of the mirrors listed in the first page.
rcrsn51 has kindly tested and confirms that it works with 32-bit printer drivers as well.
cheers!
_________________
Fatdog64, Slacko and Puppeee user. Puppy user since 2.13
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jamesbond
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 1542
Location: The Blue Marble
|
| Posted: Sun 17 Jun 2012, 20:54 Post subject:
|
|
They move fast don't they  ffmpeg was the latest when kirk compiled it back in Feb (kirk took it from git master - the latest development branch). I'll leave the decision to kirk quite a lot depends on ffmpeg, updating ffmpeg means rebuilding a lot of stuff.
_________________
Fatdog64, Slacko and Puppeee user. Puppy user since 2.13
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
nooby
Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 9393
Location: SwedenEurope
|
| Posted: Mon 18 Jun 2012, 00:06 Post subject:
|
|
jamesbond thanks for the advice on pclock and how to set up time for Puppy.
You are right now that you remind me I do remember I read that advice some
months ago. Sorry for having pooooor memory .
Does that mean one can have a 32-bit version of FatDog that is 100%
compatible with every 32-bit pet? I am so dense.
Re Firefox and the edit. Good to know. I don't want to loose bookmarks
either and I am more used to FF and FatDog already being more than
128MB why can it not be FireFox from scratch and SM as something
the SM luvrs add because them being enthusiastic about it.
I mean if 99% love FireFox then why force all those to have two browsers
*Friendly Smile*
_________________
I'm a noob so I use Google Search of Puppy Forum
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
kirk
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 1333
Location: florida
|
| Posted: Mon 18 Jun 2012, 00:16 Post subject:
|
|
Just compiled FFmpeg-0.11.1 and rebuilt vlc and kino (though it seems to be compatible). It will be in the next release.
| Quote: | Does that mean one can have a 32-bit version of FatDog that is 100%
compatible with every 32-bit pet? |
No, but with most. Especially ones for Slacko 5.3.3. I almost never need to use 32bit packages, except for proprietary stuff that's only released 32bit.
| Quote: | | I mean if 99% love FireFox then why force all those to have two browsers |
For the final release there will be a Seamonkey iso and a Firefox iso.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
nooby
Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 9393
Location: SwedenEurope
|
| Posted: Mon 18 Jun 2012, 03:40 Post subject:
|
|
Cool that will be a blessing Love when developers care about us users.
_________________
I'm a noob so I use Google Search of Puppy Forum
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
James C
Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 4743
Location: Kentucky
|
| Posted: Mon 18 Jun 2012, 03:55 Post subject:
|
|
From the new Distrowatch Weekly..
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120618
| Quote: | | Puppy Linux, the most popular of the ultra-small Linux distributions on the market, has often been criticised by reviewers for always "running as root" and for disregarding one of the most basic among the UNIX security principles. Now some community members on the project's forum responded with a special Puppy derivative called "Fatdog64", a 64-bit Puppy build with extra applications and, most importantly, an experimental multi-user setup. This beta release includes Linux kernel 3.4.2, SeaMonkey 2.10, Flash Player 11.2.202.236, and numerous bug fixes since alpha 2. From the announcement: "James and myself are happy to announce Fatdog64-600 beta 1. Here are the changes since alpha2: SFS works with multisession; add libdbus_glib; uses BusyBox blkid (faster) instead of util-linux blkid; volume label display on drive icons can be turned off; bug fix with first-time session save; hardinfo patched - does not crash, show Fatdog64 version; Windows-K key is shortcut for xkill (to kill windows apps); new control panel - all system/settings apps are now here; QuickApps - create application shortcuts; urxvt 9.15 (without Perl extension); command-line tool to split Fatdog humongous initrd to standard Puppy initrd for faster USB boot; experimental multi-user (some applications are still broken; some PET packages do not support non-root)." |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
capicoso
Joined: 13 Jan 2012
Posts: 168
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Mon 18 Jun 2012, 20:16 Post subject:
|
|
How many beta stages are scheduled?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jamesbond
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 1542
Location: The Blue Marble
|
| Posted: Mon 18 Jun 2012, 20:47 Post subject:
|
|
| James C wrote: | From the new Distrowatch Weekly..
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120618
| Quote: | | Puppy Linux, the most popular of the ultra-small Linux distributions on the market, has often been criticised by reviewers for always "running as root" and for disregarding one of the most basic among the UNIX security principles. Now some community members on the project's forum responded with a special Puppy derivative called "Fatdog64", a 64-bit Puppy build with extra applications and, most importantly, an experimental multi-user setup. This beta release includes Linux kernel 3.4.2, SeaMonkey 2.10, Flash Player 11.2.202.236, and numerous bug fixes since alpha 2. From the announcement: "James and myself are happy to announce Fatdog64-600 beta 1. Here are the changes since alpha2: SFS works with multisession; add libdbus_glib; uses BusyBox blkid (faster) instead of util-linux blkid; volume label display on drive icons can be turned off; bug fix with first-time session save; hardinfo patched - does not crash, show Fatdog64 version; Windows-K key is shortcut for xkill (to kill windows apps); new control panel - all system/settings apps are now here; QuickApps - create application shortcuts; urxvt 9.15 (without Perl extension); command-line tool to split Fatdog humongous initrd to standard Puppy initrd for faster USB boot; experimental multi-user (some applications are still broken; some PET packages do not support non-root)." |
|
Sounds good !
| Quote: | | How many beta stages are scheduled? |
I'll leave this for kirk
_________________
Fatdog64, Slacko and Puppeee user. Puppy user since 2.13
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
kirk
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 1333
Location: florida
|
| Posted: Tue 19 Jun 2012, 10:34 Post subject:
|
|
| Quote: | | How many beta stages are scheduled? |
One more beta release that will contain the kernel that will be used in final. Then a release candidate, that will be renamed as final if it's OK. Right now, this is the plan if no big problems turn up along the way.
Big thanks to all the folks testing.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Page 7 of 17 [247 Posts] |
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, ..., 15, 16, 17 Next |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index » Advanced Topics » Puppy Projects
