Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Fri 30 Jan 2015, 19:30
All times are UTC - 4

 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Puppy Projects
Lucid Puppy 5.2.8 - Updated ISO Version 005 - APR 05 2012
Moderators: Flash, JohnMurga
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
Page 111 of 190 [2847 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, ..., 188, 189, 190 Next
Author Message
playdayz


Joined: 25 Apr 2008
Posts: 3789
PostPosted: Fri 20 Apr 2012, 19:23    Post subject:  
Concerning Sulu (Lucid with the 3.x kernel) rerwin said something interesting to me--that it would make more sense to put the energy into Precise because not only the kernel but everything else would be updated and development could be done to make it more Lucid-like if desired. So check this out: uPup Precise with 3.3.2 kernel http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=77697
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
vtpup


Joined: 15 Oct 2008
Posts: 1188
Location: Republic of Vermont
PostPosted: Fri 20 Apr 2012, 22:04    Post subject:  
Cool, I'll try it!
_________________
Acer Aspire 5349-2635 laptop dual proc, 4gb ram, frugal Racy 5.5.
1999 Thinkpad 600e hacked Pent 3, overclocked 800 mHz, 490 kb running Lupu 528
Acer Iconia A1-830 x86 tablet -- Puppy some day?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
aarf

Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 3620
Location: around the bend
PostPosted: Fri 20 Apr 2012, 22:40    Post subject:  
playdayz wrote:
Concerning Sulu (Lucid with the 3.x kernel) rerwin said something interesting to me--that it would make more sense to put the energy into Precise because not only the kernel but everything else would be updated and development could be done to make it more Lucid-like if desired. So check this out: uPup Precise with 3.3.2 kernel http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=77697
are you going to tweak it separately playdayz or are you joining pemasu over there? ok start download now.
_________________

ASUS EeePC Flare series 1025C 4x Intel Atom N2800 @ 1.86GHz RAM 2063MB 800x600p ATA 320G
_-¤-_
<º))))><.¸¸.•´¯`•.#.•´¯`•.¸¸. ><((((º>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
bigpup


Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 5659
Location: Charleston S.C. USA
PostPosted: Fri 20 Apr 2012, 23:14    Post subject:  
playdayz wrote:
Concerning Sulu (Lucid with the 3.x kernel) rerwin said something interesting to me--that it would make more sense to put the energy into Precise because not only the kernel but everything else would be updated and development could be done to make it more Lucid-like if desired. So check this out: uPup Precise with 3.3.2 kernel http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=77697

If you plan to combine forces with pemasu and make this the next logical path, for Lucid Puppy, it would be very good idea.
But, it needs to start with all the features of Lucid Puppy already there. After that, just tweaking to fix bugs.
The way "uPup Precise" is now, is just another from scratch build, with a lot of stuff missing or not working.
If I understood, Barry just put it together to try out something. So was not doing a complete build.
_________________
I have found, in trying to help people, that the things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
bigpup


Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 5659
Location: Charleston S.C. USA
PostPosted: Sat 21 Apr 2012, 00:03    Post subject:  
Something to show what Linux and Puppy is all about.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&NR=1&v=8LAXg_UmzTY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkFQVcl62qo&feature=relmfu
_________________
I have found, in trying to help people, that the things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
radky

Joined: 02 May 2010
Posts: 492
PostPosted: Sat 21 Apr 2012, 10:46    Post subject:
Subject description: PupMenu-2.0		  
PupMenu-2.0

This major update features a new dual-pane interface and convenient file finder.

http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=76713
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
rerwin


Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 1554
Location: Maine, USA
PostPosted: Sat 21 Apr 2012, 12:30    Post subject: Lupu-to-Upup strategy, mainlining boot-disk remastering  
bigpup wrote:
If you plan to combine forces with pemasu and make this the next logical path, for Lucid Puppy, it would be very good idea.
But, it needs to start with all the features of Lucid Puppy already there. After that, just tweaking to fix bugs.
My idea for precise puppy (or whatever it ends up being named) is to package the unique lupu features as installable pets or built into woof. I am open to suggestions for organizing the packages.

Some parts might be the control center(s) and maybe boot-to-desktop if feasible. Please identify the features to preserve.

One thing I am considering is to make Lucid Pup's remastering of "boot disks" a visible feature. To do that, I would like input from those using the hidden capability in lupuplus and patch-8 to make these disks, particularly about anything more that should be done for that process such as clear out some directories like browser caches. There seems to be some interest in having this be generally available:
oui, in the Upup Precise thread, wrote:
As it starts fast and finds all main settings of my PC about himself I would be interesting to use it completely without save file!

Why: old puppy's under 1.1 did work so:

each day a fresh puppy. no change, no spy, no disturb Idea Rolling Eyes

I would remaster it once after I will have adapted my settings, create a /root/,mozilla/seamonkey with different absolute non critic and not sensible entries, a link in /root to /mnt/home/f/my instead of /root/my-documents and would never save somewhat after that in /root as I can do it directly hitting on the link my-documents Idea so

- I don't need some save file any more at all,
- have a system never changing in all details in the puppy file system
- have a system with highest confidentiality as no entry would stay in it after each shutdown, only the data I have entered intentionally manually before I did remaster!

To do it, I need a version without greeting at the begin of the session and without asking if I will save before shutting down!

What would be to do to avoid to start the greeting immediately after start and avoid the question if you want save before reboot or shutting down?
from: http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=621529#621529
I would prepare an update to submit for woof, as part of the lupu features to go there.
Richard
Last edited by rerwin on Sat 21 Apr 2012, 15:09; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
playdayz


Joined: 25 Apr 2008
Posts: 3789
PostPosted: Sat 21 Apr 2012, 12:54    Post subject:  
Quote:
If you plan to combine forces with pemasu and make this the next logical path,

No, not me, it's pemasu's thing and whoever wants to participate. rerwin already has ideas.
Last edited by playdayz on Sat 21 Apr 2012, 19:28; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
bigpup


Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 5659
Location: Charleston S.C. USA
PostPosted: Sat 21 Apr 2012, 16:11    Post subject:  
Something to consider using in next update.
Latest coreutils (v. 8-16, late March 2012)
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=77671
_________________
I have found, in trying to help people, that the things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
playdayz


Joined: 25 Apr 2008
Posts: 3789
PostPosted: Sat 21 Apr 2012, 20:21    Post subject:  
PupMenu 2.0

I thought radky had announced it in this thread but I can't find it. Anyway, it's cool--fun to just play with, provides a lot of information, and will appear in the upcoming Lupu Plus. Duh, the 4th message above this one Wink

http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=76713
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
prehistoric


Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 1333
PostPosted: Sun 22 Apr 2012, 15:25    Post subject:
Subject description: alternate browser problems		  
I've had good luck installing 5.28.005 on a number of machines. However, a request for Chromium as browser on one machine got me into trouble. This caused me to try several alternate browsers. Here are some results:

aurora - shows up in PPM as arora; information button leads to wikipedia page unrelated to any browser.

chrome - On this one machine I can't seem to run any derivative of chromium, Google-chrome or Iron. In the case of the oldest version this is explained by an attempt to "exec chrome-linux" which does not exist.

Later versions seem to fail immediately, reporting "Illegal instruction" when run from a console.

Opera - PPM reports missing shared libraries, but the browser comes up. I haven't done much testing of it though.

The machine giving me trouble has an ASUS A7S8X-MX motherboard with an Athlon-XP 2500+, and 2GB of RAM. I've tried the integrated SiS 741 graphics and two different nVidia AGP cards. The graphics seems to work each way. I've run memtest86+ 4.20 through a full pass, taking an hour and 15 mins, without errors.

I do not have trouble on machines with the Intel Pentium 4, Atom or Celeron, or the AMD Athlon 64, Athlon II, Phenom, Phenom II. Everything except these browsers seems to work, with the exception of CPU frequency scaling (BIOS older than 2007). When I stress the processor I can get the temperature up to 58C, but this does not seem to correlate with this problem. Before I replaced the processor the previous one was running at higher temperatures.

My guess is that these builds are testing for some feature present in all the 64-bit architectures, but this traps as an illegal instruction on some AMD 32 bit processors. If the problem is in the graphics I am at a loss to explain how it can run TORCS, but not these browsers.

Otherwise, this looks like a great little Puppy machine for someone.

Any ideas?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
pemasu


Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 5467
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Sun 22 Apr 2012, 15:36    Post subject:  
I think Arora means Arora like Qt based browser Arora. The big size of the pet comes from in build Qt libs.

http://code.google.com/p/arora/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 6023
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Sun 22 Apr 2012, 15:51    Post subject:  
Believe that's the Arora browser pet I built long,long ago.Actually a pretty nice little browser. Smile
Arora browser.png
 Description   
 Filesize   117.55 KB
 Viewed   766 Time(s)

Arora browser.png
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 6023
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Sun 22 Apr 2012, 16:03    Post subject:
Subject description: alternate browser problems		  
prehistoric wrote:

chrome - On this one machine I can't seem to run any derivative of chromium, Google-chrome or Iron. In the case of the oldest version this is explained by an attempt to "exec chrome-linux" which does not exist.

Later versions seem to fail immediately, reporting "Illegal instruction" when run from a console.


Since my main Linux box is an Athlon XP 2400+ I can confirm. It appears that the problem exists mainly for Athlon XP and older cpu's and Intel P3's and older.Haven't noticed a problem on newer AMD or Intel P4's and newer.
Luckily, the google Chrome pet ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pet-packages-lucid/Google_Chrome-18-Lucid.pet posted a few pages back does work on Athlon Xp cpu's.
Not Chromium but the same family.HTH.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
prehistoric


Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 1333
PostPosted: Sun 22 Apr 2012, 16:14    Post subject:  
James C wrote:
Believe that's the Arora browser pet I built long,long ago.Actually a pretty nice little browser. Smile
Not knocking the browser, but -- just for grins -- take a look at the information page PPM offers.

The latest suggestion is that these processors were essentially the same as the Athlon MP. Could the browser code be trying to find out if this is capable of multiprocessing????

This is a "Barton" (10 th generation AMD) processor. For hard-core hardware types I offer the exact processor code: AXDA2500DKV4D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 111 of 190 [2847 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, ..., 188, 189, 190 Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Puppy Projects
Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

[ Time: 0.1391s ][ Queries: 13 (0.0474s) ][ GZIP on ]