Author |
Message |
mahaju

Joined: 11 Oct 2010 Posts: 491 Location: between the keyboard and the chair
|
Posted: Mon 05 Mar 2012, 02:27 Post subject:
What are JWM and openbox? |
|
And what happens if I switch between the two?
I don't see much difference
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bigpup

Joined: 11 Oct 2009 Posts: 10317 Location: Charleston S.C. USA
|
Posted: Mon 05 Mar 2012, 02:56 Post subject:
|
|
They are different window managers.
They both do the same basic thing.
Each has it's own specific features, but they are not that much different.
The best example is what settings can be changed.
JWM - use "JWM configuration"
Openbox - use "Openbox config" and "Fbpanel configuration"
Example screen shots:
Description |
|
Filesize |
29.2 KB |
Viewed |
14205 Time(s) |

|
Description |
|
Filesize |
49.26 KB |
Viewed |
17186 Time(s) |

|
Description |
|
Filesize |
46.47 KB |
Viewed |
2555 Time(s) |

|
_________________ I have found, in trying to help people, that the things they do not tell you, are usually the clue to solving the problem.
When I was a kid I wanted to be older.... This is not what I expected 
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15238 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Mon 05 Mar 2012, 03:35 Post subject:
|
|
Gosh bigpup, our support level just reached a new high
Perfect answer.
More technical info and choices here
http://puppylinux.org/wikka/WindowManagers
_________________ YinYana AI Buddhism
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mahaju

Joined: 11 Oct 2010 Posts: 491 Location: between the keyboard and the chair
|
Posted: Mon 05 Mar 2012, 03:48 Post subject:
|
|
Thank you for the useful information
I used to think it was just something like changing the theme (such as the default icons) until I noticed that there are different applications for doing things like those (changing the appearance of icons, changing background) so I was just wondering what it actually was
What confused me more was when I changed form the default Openbox to JWM I didn't didn't see much difference
I think it changed changed the screen resolution slightly and the start menu edges look a bit more sharp I think, but other than that there is no noticeable difference
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
darkcity

Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 2545 Location: near here
|
Posted: Mon 05 Mar 2012, 07:28 Post subject:
|
|
@BigPup great answer. its the sort of stuff we need to fill the wiki with
@mahaju
Openbox let you set the mouse and keyboard bindings, that has be ultra useful when using Inkscape
_________________ helping Wiki for help
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
sfeeley
Joined: 14 Feb 2010 Posts: 809
|
Posted: Mon 05 Mar 2012, 09:43 Post subject:
|
|
This is a decent explanation as to what windows environments are. Note that the ones discussed in the article aren't in puppy by default (although some can be installed)--but its still an intro to the concept.
http://lifehacker.com/5762081/wtf-desktop-environments-gnome-kde-and-more-explained
Also, openbox has themes that can be installed (I suppose there's some for JWM--I just don't see them)
http://box-look.org/index.php?xcontentmode=7402
In short, both are basically slightly different toolkits for tweaking appearances. If you're happy or don't care, pick one and ignore.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
darkcity

Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 2545 Location: near here
|
Posted: Mon 05 Mar 2012, 11:45 Post subject:
|
|
performance is another issue I believe JWM is slightly faster ; -)
_________________ helping Wiki for help
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
amigo
Joined: 02 Apr 2007 Posts: 2641
|
Posted: Mon 05 Mar 2012, 14:52 Post subject:
|
|
They are called window managers. They draw the windows you see -with the title bar, the borders and sometimes re-size corners at the bottom. They also usually setup keyboard-shortcuts. A full desktop environment includes lots of other things. Purists even reject having a panel or taskbar as being part of the window manager.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ICPUG
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 1304 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue 06 Mar 2012, 09:25 Post subject:
|
|
For the sadists among you who may wish to explore further, here is my take on the Anatomy of a GUI back in 2009.
Warnings:
Lots of text.
Discusses things other than Puppy (Windows, MacOS, The Amiga, ...)
http://www.icpug.org.uk/national/features/091122fe.htm
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Aitch

Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 6815 Location: Chatham, Kent, UK
|
Posted: Tue 06 Mar 2012, 10:09 Post subject:
|
|
Nice, ICPUG
I also explored the website - some interesting stuff!
Aitch
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Moose On The Loose

Joined: 24 Feb 2011 Posts: 778
|
Posted: Tue 06 Mar 2012, 11:53 Post subject:
Re: What are JWM and openbox? |
|
mahaju wrote: | And what happens if I switch between the two?
I don't see much difference |
I see that others have answered the question from a higher level point of view. I think it may also be helpful to say:
Your graphics card and monitor and stuff are all configured by the thing called "xwindows". This is a very low level program. It can have one of a great many "window managers" added to it. The window manager strangely enough deals with the "managing" of the windows. Things like what keystroke closes a window and how you resize them and issues like that are all part of management.
JWM is a very small and very efficient window manager program. It is fairy simple to configure to do all the things that need to be done. It lacks some of the clever things of other windows managers like bouncing icons and spinning icons and the like. It just does those things that are needed to get the job done.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Peterm321
Joined: 29 Jan 2009 Posts: 386
|
Posted: Tue 06 Mar 2012, 13:28 Post subject:
|
|
I find Openbox is a small and fast window manager. In terms of speed, I dont see a difference with JWM. I like the option to undecorate a window (remove the titlebar for a small increment in screen space). Alt+Tab switching displays fairly large easy to read icons along with the program titles.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
`f00

Joined: 06 Nov 2008 Posts: 808 Location: the Western Reserve
|
Posted: Sat 11 Aug 2012, 12:48 Post subject:
Subject description: 13 is a lucky number sometimes (oddly enough) |
|
Pennys worth
Both jwm and openbox are fine window managers. It all depends on your style as to which may suit you better (having both is the best option, imo).
Jwm has more features natively included (trays especially) and runs a bit lighter because of that. Window focus can be click or sloppy but there is no autoraise option (as far as I'm aware of). Control options tend to be not as extensive for most users. Basically it's simpler in many ways but still offers a very useful feature set in a light wm.
Openbox is more compliant (EWMH and such) but may need add ons if you want a taskbar, pager, systray and so on. Natively it uses a client menu for iconified windows. The configuration gui is easy to use but themes are a bit more complex to create. It has autoraise with delay but no outline option for moving/resizing windows to point out a few other basic differences from jwm. A much more complete set of control binds in one place (~/.config/openbox/rc.xml) plus a default top, 'root' and bottom section for the main menu.
Either can be fast and lean or loaded up with other stuff. Both can look great.
Survey says:
openbox is Capped less often
Joe's Window Manager is rarely referenced as such
Not quite 2¢, but hth
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
stu91

Joined: 06 Aug 2012 Posts: 145 Location: England. Dpup. Dell Inspiron 1501
|
Posted: Sat 11 Aug 2012, 13:14 Post subject:
|
|
A great feature of Openbox is the pipe-menu - these are menus that are generated on the fly by scripts.
Here is a good write up explaining openbox pipe-menus:
http://pclosmag.com/html/Issues/201110/page01.html
And here:
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/four-great-pipe-menus-for-openbox/2720?tag=content;siu-container
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|