Other Distros

Puppy related raves and general interest that doesn't fit anywhere else
Message
Author
User avatar
kooliepup
Posts: 292
Joined: Sat 14 Jan 2012, 03:40
Location: Victoria, Australia

#321 Post by kooliepup »

Bodhi is so good.

It is just the basics, and you have to add the apps you want.
That's what I like.

Apps are easy to install.
It can be VERY easily remastered with Remastersys (included).
You can set a root password and run as root.

Enjoy it.
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#322 Post by nooby »

oops I have some 7000 that is kind of surprising :)

Anyway I feel so envy about all those geeks that get
CorePlus going. I totally failed to get what RobertS
told the fans of TinyCore to do and I don't dare to ask
them again. They seems very irritated when one fail to
get their instructions.

Here is what one guy say on DW.
63 • Tiny Core (by DJ on 2012-01-27 11:51:49 GMT from Germany)

I think here is something everyone should know;

When getting started with the Core Project you have 3 different download options: Core, TinyCore, and CorePlus. TinyCore and CorePlus are simply Core plus additional extensions.

TinyCore (12 MB) - This is the recommended option for new users who have a wired network connection. It includes the base Core system plus extensions for a FLWM graphical desktop environment.

CorePlus (48 MB) - This is the recommended option for new users who only have a wireless network connection or who use a non-US keyboard layout. It includes the base Core System and extensions to provide the following: 6 Window Manager options, Wireless support, an installer, non-US keyboard support, and a remastering tool.
Oh Dear I am not a new user I am a too old user so I fail to
get how one do CorePlus.
Even to chose which one of the six WM is beyond me.

why on earth can they not allow that somebody smart
make a standard Puppy out of CorePlus so one can learn
how the end result should look like. Now one need to be
really smart to get it.

Have any of you done a frugal install of CorePlus?
How did you do it? Any suggestion?
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#323 Post by nooby »

kooliepup, they have sad news for you over at DW comments.

User forlin writes
68 • Bodhi and Bloathi (by forlin on 2012-01-28 13:47:54 GMT from Portugal)
Samsung, the powerful Enlightenment patron,
is not interested at all about the E17 desktop
environment. The direct consequence is that Rasterman,
the Enlightenment founder, is currently developing it
himself, but almost alone. E17 just works, but it's not
progressing a inch.

Bodhi appeared at a time when there was almost any
decent E17 Linux distro.

Strong ambition and the users wish for a good E17 distro,
were the basis for its meteoric success.
Unfortunately, Bodhi founder is not is not the kind of a
Judd Vinet person. He says he can't even program, and
(excluding mediocre PR) showed little to none interest
about promoting E17 from inside Bodhi.

I see his kind of ambition as one driven by the wish to be
in the spotlight, and he did very well on that.

The problem is about the Bodhi future. It's tied to the E17
future and considering the current panorama, chances are
in 10 years, Bodhi will be just at where it is today.
More or less Bloathi will not change that.
Another small Ubuntu is PepperMint they have similar
ideas but maybe they are not into E17. Is that the main
reason you like it?
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

User avatar
kooliepup
Posts: 292
Joined: Sat 14 Jan 2012, 03:40
Location: Victoria, Australia

#324 Post by kooliepup »

Nooby,

I like it for many reasons.
That does not mean that I am wedded to it.
I always go with whatever is best (IMHO) for a particular purpose.
Bodhi is my current live CD for online use.
It is better, for me, than anything else, including Puppy.
The remastered CD loads faster than a Puppy remaster
(and before anyone tells me, again, that Puppy live loads in 19 seconds or something,
I will say rename the whatever.sfs that is on your hard disc,
so it stops reading that instead of the one on the CD, and try again),
and it remasters better than Puppy,
and uses the best Network Manager.

I do like e17, but that is not a prime attraction.
e17 is a PIA for newcomers to it, and it is understandable why so many hate it.

When something better than Bodhi comes along, I'll use it.

Puppy is my choice for most other uses.
I have numerous Puppies set up, frugal-in-folder, for specific activities.
Last edited by kooliepup on Sun 29 Jan 2012, 23:57, edited 2 times in total.
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

User avatar
Colonel Panic
Posts: 2171
Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09

#325 Post by Colonel Panic »

Just a tip for anyone who tries CTKArch (or ArchBang) and finds the theme a bit too dark in either case; fvwm-crystal (which can easily be installed from the arch repo) compliments it very well and is a very good, lightweight and attractive WM in its own right. :)
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.

linuxbear
Posts: 620
Joined: Sat 18 Apr 2009, 20:39
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

#326 Post by linuxbear »

I did not like Gnome 3, or unity and KDE 4.x is a bit too pokey. Bohdi loads from an SSD on my 6 year old machine to full usability in about 8 seconds.

User avatar
Colonel Panic
Posts: 2171
Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09

#327 Post by Colonel Panic »

Thanks for that comment. I'd quite like an SSD drive in my machine but I don't think it would work in a machine as old as mine.
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.

linuxbear
Posts: 620
Joined: Sat 18 Apr 2009, 20:39
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

#328 Post by linuxbear »

Colonel Panic wrote:Thanks for that comment. I'd quite like an SSD drive in my machine but I don't think it would work in a machine as old as mine.
Mine is about 6 years old. Sometimes the SATA 2 bus is a bit too slow to acquire the drive and I have to perform a 3-finger salute before to machine will actually see the SSD. I am sure a Sata 3 card would resolve this, but right now it is not that much of a nuisance.

User avatar
Aitch
Posts: 6518
Joined: Wed 04 Apr 2007, 15:57
Location: Chatham, Kent, UK

#329 Post by Aitch »

CP
If you have an IDE PC you can get 4/8/16/32/64Gb DOM nandflash devices....but they go pricey for both big and small

16Gb are about £35, kingspec do both 40 and 44 pin types for lappys

You can also get 1.8" devices and an adapter to 44 pin,

....however many require a 4 pin ide power connector, such as this shows, and power leads are often not supplied

http://preview.tinyurl.com/7e766hj

CF flash in an adapter is a cheaper route - £1/Gb, but they're a bit slower, unless you get x133/200 speed, but do work in older PCs

Otherwise try class10 microSD in a USB adapter, if you're happy to use wakepup/PLOP to boot up

Aitch :)

linuxbear
Posts: 620
Joined: Sat 18 Apr 2009, 20:39
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

#330 Post by linuxbear »


User avatar
Colonel Panic
Posts: 2171
Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09

#331 Post by Colonel Panic »

Aitch and linuxbear; thanks for the tips, I'll look into it. At the moment I'm booting Polarpup from an 8 GB USB pen drive, which at least works and saves wear and tear on the hard drive but is a bit slow.
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.

User avatar
Aitch
Posts: 6518
Joined: Wed 04 Apr 2007, 15:57
Location: Chatham, Kent, UK

#332 Post by Aitch »

In USB2, Sandisk Cruzer Extreme, Adata, OCZ rallye2, or any quad channel/MLC drives are doing 30mb/s read/write these days, faster - up to 90mb/s for some OCZ eSata/USB drives

Price rules, mainly......

Aitch :)

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#333 Post by nooby »

What is the difference between these?

1. Porteus that says it is a Slax Remix Community distro
renamed to Porteus.

2. Salix that DW says is a Slackware but could it not be Slax?

3. Nimblex that I have not looked what it claims to be
but that one behave a bit like Porteus and Salix too.

All three seems more Slax than Slackware and how do them
differ? Well as far as I know I have booted many many Slax
and never booted a real Slackware in frugal install.

So I trust all three is Slax and not Slackware but how do
them differ from each other?

I tried to reuse Porteus cheat code to boot Salix
I am not member of their forum so could not ask.

title Porteus v11_32 username=root passwd=toor
root (hd0,2)
kernel /32bit_v11/boot/vmlinuz from_dev=/dev/sda3 from_dir=/32bit_v11/porteus changes=/mnt/sda3/32bit_v11/porteus11.dat toroot autoexec=xconf; max_loop=256 lxde fsck kmap=se vga=791
initrd /32bit_v11/boot/initrd.xz


title salix using salixlive-xfce-13.37-32.iso username=root passwd=live
root (hd0,2)
kernel /salixboot/vmlinuz rw toroot root=/dev/ram0 from_dev=/dev/sda3 from_dir=/salixlive fsck vga=791 autologin username=root passwd=live changes=slxsave.xfs
initrd /salixboot/initrd.xz

I maybe should not do autologin on Salix but was too lazy to test without. I failed to do changes. Most likely the
ntfs nfs3-g or what name it has needs to be there? Is it?

Very few seems to care abot Slax not even the Slackware
people care about it? I feel for them because they allow
frugal boot which I don't remember that many of the other distros do except Knoppix and Core?
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

User avatar
Lobster
Official Crustacean
Posts: 15522
Joined: Wed 04 May 2005, 06:06
Location: Paradox Realm
Contact:

#334 Post by Lobster »

Just tried Sabayon 8 64bit Gnome edition.

What can we learn (from a pudding)? [tsk tsk . . . must behave - we are named after a missing dog] :oops:
OK first of all I normally like Sabayon. Find it solid . . . not always good for a fluffy Italian pudding . . . [behave! . . . sorry must get my mind in gear . . .] :roll:

OK
1. Three Window Manager versions? Well if Saluki has two (Xfce and JWM) and we end up with a KDE SFS - job done . . .
http://puppylinux.org/wikka/Saluki
2. Straight to desktop. Always a better option. Puppy is getting there. It did good. Most Linux now get straight to desktop. All hardware. Including earlier . . . m m m . . . ?
3. Ease of use. I was struggling to make sense of this interface. I just can not be bothered. We have a phone and touch screen (yet to emerge) generation, that expects to KNOW how things work.
Looked at it. Just not for me.
I much preferred Gentoo 12 much more cutting edge (I think was the version I tried) which Sabayon is based on.

Be interested if others prefer it? Could not find a YouTube vid to give you a taste. Maybe sneaky or Icyos have one?
Puppy Raspup 8.2Final 8)
Puppy Links Page http://www.smokey01.com/bruceb/puppy.html :D

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#335 Post by James C »

Been experimenting with an install of the latest Porteus on one of my old P4 test boxes.Pretty fast for a KDE distro.The Porteus documentation for setting up the menu.lst was totally useless but the correct entry wasn't too hard to figure out.Nice to be able to run as root too. :)

User avatar
Colonel Panic
Posts: 2171
Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09

#336 Post by Colonel Panic »

I've recently been trying Bridge Linux, a little known Arch-based distro based on XFce and including LibreOffice and Chromium.

If you like the exclusively grey interface and desktop wallpaper, it looks pretty good, but at the moment I don't have a good enough reason to install it in place of CTKArch (and I haven't got room for both right now).
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#337 Post by nooby »

James C wrote:Been experimenting with an install of the latest Porteus on one of my old P4 test boxes.Pretty fast for a KDE distro.The Porteus documentation for setting up the menu.lst was totally useless but the correct entry wasn't too hard to figure out.Nice to be able to run as root too. :)
You would not mind sharing that menu.lst then? I have also tried to boot
Porteus but I am not good at it.

title Porteus v11_32 username=root passwd=toor
root (hd0,2)
kernel /32bit_v11/boot/vmlinuz from_dev=/dev/sda3 from_dir=/32bit_v11/porteus changes=/mnt/sda3/32bit_v11/porteus11.dat toroot autoexec=xconf; max_loop=256 lxde fsck kmap=se vga=791
initrd /32bit_v11/boot/initrd.xz

It tells me to not use the from_dir=/32bit_v11/porteus that is deprecated it says.

So what did you use instead? In an older test install I used this simplified

title Porteus OS Log in as root Passw is toor then do startx
rootnoverify (hd0,0)
kernel /porteusboot/vmlinuz rw changes=/porteus/slaxsave.dat
initrd /porteusboot/initrd.lz

So hope you take time and share your solution I am rather confused
what to use.
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

User avatar
Billtoo
Posts: 3720
Joined: Tue 07 Apr 2009, 13:47
Location: Ontario Canada

Fuduntu 2012.1

#338 Post by Billtoo »

I downloaded the Fuduntu 2012.1 release, it's supposed to be light and work well on netbooks and other not so powerful computers.
I installed it on my acer revo nettop pc which has an atom dual core multi-threading processor.
So far I like it, the iso is over 900mb but the apps included are good, vlc, chrome browser, brasero, cheese, etc.

EDIT: I forgot to mention that windows etc. have the jigglies, special effects, kind of neat.
Attachments
Workspace 1_001.jpg
(62.26 KiB) Downloaded 858 times
Last edited by Billtoo on Wed 15 Feb 2012, 20:00, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
James C
Posts: 6618
Joined: Thu 26 Mar 2009, 05:12
Location: Kentucky

#339 Post by James C »

nooby wrote: You would not mind sharing that menu.lst then? I have also tried to boot
Porteus but I am not good at it.
With the understanding that this install is on an ext3 partition and uses good old legacy Grub (because that combination simply works the best), here's my entry for Porteus in the menu.lst.

Code: Select all

title Porteus, no changes, Copy to ram
root (hd0,7)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz from=/porteus/ ramdisk_size=6666 root=/dev/ram0 rw copy2ram autoexec=xconf;startx
initrd /boot/initrd.xz

title Porteus w/changes
root (hd0,7)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz from=porteus/ ramdisk-size=6666 root=/dev/ram0 rw changes=porteus-save.dat autoexec=xconf;startx
initrd /boot/initrd.xz

Boots straight in being root ...... the first entry allows no changes.... basically like running the live cd. The second entry allows for changes with full read/write access to the entire hard drive.
Running Mepis, Zenwalk, Porteus and about 5 or 6 Puppy installs on this old test box.

nooby
Posts: 10369
Joined: Sun 29 Jun 2008, 19:05
Location: SwedenEurope

#340 Post by nooby »

Thanks James, I will test it tomorrow. 11.20 PM here now so going to bed.

Is it not surprising that Porteus allow us to be root and to save in that way
while Debian seems to not like us being root on frugal install.

How come they have so different views? When did that happen.
I mean did they have some debate on it and one side lost or what?
How far back in time when that did got decided? How can one win
over people to the more relaxed attitude?
I use Google Search on Puppy Forum
not an ideal solution though

Post Reply