Would be cool if the Puppy Developers commented
on if it could be implemented to Puppy of if SFS is
the same thing only under another name?
RobertS tells about it here
http://forum.tinycorelinux.net/index.ph ... l#msg67363
and Jason himself tells about the basics of SCM here
http://forum.tinycorelinux.net/index.ph ... l#msg67393
and read this one too or the whole thread.
http://forum.tinycorelinux.net/index.ph ... l#msg67403
I'm a noob so I have no idea what they talk about butthe scm is just a simple putting back into practice
the compressed mountable image - .uci - that Robert
pioneered many years ago which I am personally getting
once again hooked on.
I like that it can be a safe playground where we can go
ahead and use gtk3, python3, other new things, etc,
without having to wait on a migration in the tcz area.
Don't get me wrong, I plan to maintain my tcz extensions,
and the tcz area remains of utmost importance as it is our
'system', whereas the scm's are self contained and
basically affect nothing else outside themselves.
it sounds interesting so would be cool to get different views on it.
Is it like SFS and if it differs how does it differs?