Author |
Message |
playdayz

Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 3794
|
Posted: Sat 10 Dec 2011, 16:52 Post subject:
|
|
Quote: | md5sum from right click doesnt work in lupufyed racy522. dont know about in slacko |
aarf, gtkhash was not in version 002 of lupufy-slacko. It is in the current version 003. Thanks.
Geoffrey, I will move Menumaker and update in version 004. Thanks.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
01micko

Joined: 11 Oct 2008 Posts: 8670 Location: qld
|
Posted: Sun 11 Dec 2011, 16:53 Post subject:
|
|
Important
There is a critical bug with the installation of lupufy-slacko and lupufy-slacko-openbox
The permissions on var and tmp are wrong
tmp <-- 1777
var <-- 777
This can cause problems often with printing.
I have fixed this for the pets I'm uploading to the slacko repo.
If you have installed lupufy-slacko or lupufy-slacko-openbox please run these commands in a terminal: Code: | chmod 1777 /tmp
chmod 777 /var | This should fix the issue.
Thank you.
_____________________________________
NB: Note to ALL packagers:
This is a common problem when a package maker (including sfs files and especially debs) does not check the permissions and ownership of the directories before packaging. It only takes a second to do this and correct. If I have to explain how to do change permissions/ownership you should not be packaging for general consumption!! Ubuntu debs are very sloppy. often the ownership is some one elses (not on your system so it defaults to 500). This is not a puppy problem however it is the cause of a lot of grief.
_________________ Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
playdayz

Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 3794
|
Posted: Sun 11 Dec 2011, 20:44 Post subject:
|
|
Quote: | The permissions on var and tmp are wrong
tmp <-- 1777
var <-- 777 |
Version 004 of lupufy-slacko and version 002 of lupufy-slacko-openbox correct this problem. They are described in the first message of this thread.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
aarf
Joined: 30 Aug 2007 Posts: 3613 Location: around the bend
|
Posted: Mon 12 Dec 2011, 07:54 Post subject:
|
|
racy522 maybe i ran out of space. (15 m out of 47m still reported free) or it was from deleting what i had installed already before adding the pets.
tried a few things and they are working. md5sum for iso, sfs, tar.gz are working from right click now.
dont know if or what the missing dependencies affect. i dont recall doing a dependancy check with lupify002
Description |
|
Filesize |
22.89 KB |
Viewed |
3182 Time(s) |

|
Description |
|
Filesize |
10.09 KB |
Viewed |
3109 Time(s) |

|
Description |
|
Filesize |
15.94 KB |
Viewed |
3060 Time(s) |

|
Description |
|
Filesize |
15.74 KB |
Viewed |
3123 Time(s) |

|
_________________
ASUS EeePC Flare series 1025C 4x Intel Atom N2800 @ 1.86GHz RAM 2063MB 800x600p ATA 320G
_-¤-_
<º))))><.¸¸.•´¯`•.#.•´¯`•.¸¸. ><((((º>
Last edited by aarf on Mon 12 Dec 2011, 08:40; edited 2 times in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
aarf
Joined: 30 Aug 2007 Posts: 3613 Location: around the bend
|
Posted: Mon 12 Dec 2011, 08:32 Post subject:
|
|
this desktop icon snuck in the backdoor when i wasnt looking. will change it back to its fbpanel -lupify2 icon.
Description |
|
Filesize |
1.36 KB |
Viewed |
3154 Time(s) |

|
_________________
ASUS EeePC Flare series 1025C 4x Intel Atom N2800 @ 1.86GHz RAM 2063MB 800x600p ATA 320G
_-¤-_
<º))))><.¸¸.•´¯`•.#.•´¯`•.¸¸. ><((((º>
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
playdayz

Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 3794
|
Posted: Wed 14 Dec 2011, 11:55 Post subject:
|
|
Quote: | dont know if or what the missing dependencies affect. |
aarf, That is good information, but I *think* it might be an artifact of Puppy Package Manager, plus I am sure some of the files are truly not there. Lupufy-slacko was created by combining many separate pets and then making sure they were configured as in Lucid. PPM has irritated me by reporting missing dependencies which were actually not missing, just not located where expected by PPM. Trying to satisfy PPM would probably lead to dependency hell and a larger lupufy-slacko. Anyway, if the features of lupufy-slacko are working I am not going to worry overmuch. If you find one that is not working in racy then i will try to make it work in the next version, though I could not add any programs that would conflict with slacko Thanks.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kickstart

Joined: 09 Mar 2011 Posts: 92
|
Posted: Fri 16 Dec 2011, 15:02 Post subject:
|
|
Quote: | Have just tried lupufying Racy. Roxterm appears in the utilities menu but doesn't start when clicked. lxtask is missing completely. Otherwise all the other additional utilities seem to work fine. |
Quote: | Thanks kickstart. I can understand about roxterm--there is probably something missing. If you could run 'roxterm' in a console it might tell us what is missing and I could possibly add it. LX Task should be under Menu -> System -> system status and config. i don't know why it wouldn't be there. Could you also try to run that in a console if you get a chance--run 'lxtask' no quotations of course. |
Sorry about the delayed reply concerning lupufying Racy 522. I'm a merchant seaman and spend long periods without internet access. I tried running lxtask in a console and it was fine so I looked again in the menu and it was where you said it should be. Just didn't look properly first time! Roxterm didn't run. Here's what I got:-
#roxterm
roxterm: error while loading shared libraries: libdbus-glib-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
#
I have just uninstalled lupufy-slacko-002 and replaced it with version 004 but it is exactly the same.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
playdayz

Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 3794
|
Posted: Sat 17 Dec 2011, 15:48 Post subject:
|
|
Quote: | In racy
#roxterm
roxterm: error while loading shared libraries: libdbus-glib-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory |
Hey kickstart, It looks like racy does not have libdbus-glib. I do not want to add a version of libdbus-glib to lupufy-slacko because Slacko already has one. Let's try this simple fix. Install this pet in racy and see what happens with roxterm. Thanks.
Description |
|

Download |
Filename |
dbus-glib.pet |
Filesize |
81.4 KB |
Downloaded |
411 Time(s) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ravensrest

Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 358 Location: Grants Pass, Oregon
|
Posted: Sat 17 Dec 2011, 22:01 Post subject:
|
|
I upgraded to Slacko 5.3.1 (which runs great) and then installed http://diddywahdiddy.net/Puppy500/lupufy-slacko-xinedvd-001.pet, but when I tried to run it I got an error message that the libXine.so was too short.
BS
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
playdayz

Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 3794
|
Posted: Sun 18 Dec 2011, 17:59 Post subject:
|
|
Quote: | I upgraded to Slacko 5.3.1 (which runs great) and then installed http://diddywahdiddy.net/Puppy500/lupufy-slacko-xinedvd-001.pet, but when I tried to run it I got an error message that the libXine.so was too short. |
ravensrest, Is it possible that your slacko save file is low on memory? That can cause pets to install improperly. I just installed XineDVD in a fresh 5.3.1 and also upgraded a previous 5.3 to 5.3.1 and XineDVD worked both ways. To find how much memory you have mouse over the icon with 4 bars in the system tray in the lower right corner. 50MB should be enough.
I guess your problem was that XineDVD did not run from the menu and so you ran xine in a terminal?
You should check to make sure you got a good download of the pet. The checksum for lupufy-slacko-xinedvd-001.pet is 0e8c24ebc8280634b87b1006d659125d. If you have lupufy-slacko installed you can check by right-clicking the pet and choosing md5sum. POtherwise open a terminal int he directory that contains the pet and enter
Code: | md5sum lupufy-slacko-xinedvd-001.pet |
Also, /usr/lib/libxine.so.1.30.0 should show a size of 309K (316416 bytes) in rox -> properties.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ravensrest

Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 358 Location: Grants Pass, Oregon
|
Posted: Sun 18 Dec 2011, 22:23 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks, Playdayz, that did seem to be the problem. Increased personal storage by 32 M and it runs perfectly.
BS
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
darkcity

Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 2545 Location: near here
|
Posted: Fri 23 Mar 2012, 14:25 Post subject:
|
|
added to wiki as i think people used to lucid will find this useful
http://puppylinux.org/wikka/LupufySlacko
_________________ helping Wiki for help
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
darkcity

Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 2545 Location: near here
|
Posted: Sun 25 Mar 2012, 16:48 Post subject:
|
|
using openbox pet
'fppanel configure' has trouble remembering Pplugin and Launch, when you switch various other settings - such as 'tray - true/false'
just a minor thing
_________________ helping Wiki for help
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
playdayz

Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 3794
|
Posted: Sun 25 Mar 2012, 18:24 Post subject:
|
|
Version 005 of Lupufy Slacko is posted in the first message of this thread. Since Slacko 5.3.3 includes PupControl it is removed from Version 005.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mikeslr

Joined: 16 Jun 2008 Posts: 2336 Location: 500 seconds from Sol
|
Posted: Sun 25 Mar 2012, 20:01 Post subject:
Half (Almost) Lupufy Slacko -- Launcher Runs under JWM |
|
Hi playdaz & All;
One of the reasons I like Openbox is that currently wbar doesn't hide. So using openbox with fbpanel enables me to add launcher (which by the way wasn't included among your lupufy apps).
I sort-of Lupufyed Slacko using the pet just to add openbox, and added launcher. Unfortunately, the other pets and sfses I added didn't show up in the menu. (They might have had I read this Geoffrey's post: http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=588058#588058). But instead I switched back to jwm and was surprised (' ') and happy (' ') to discover Launcher was still active.
So now I have "the best" of both. Just thought others might be interested. And perhaps you could add a pet to just install fbpanel and launcher. (I don't think launcher would work without fbpanel, even though jwm uses its own for the task bar).
mikesLr
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|