Wary 0.9.2 (092) feedback
snd_pcsp
snd_pcsp was steeling the show from cs46xx. After I blacklisted the snd_pcsp, everything works fine.
With pfix=ram boot, sound was fine, but with upgrade from -090 to -092, with susequent boots the pcspeaker device was always the default - even after using alsa wizard and multiple sound card wizard and trying other things.
Is good now.
With pfix=ram boot, sound was fine, but with upgrade from -090 to -092, with susequent boots the pcspeaker device was always the default - even after using alsa wizard and multiple sound card wizard and trying other things.
Is good now.
Seamonkey 2..0.9 pet compiled in Wary 0.9.2
Seamonkey 2.0.9 for Wary 0.9.2 is attached. 16MB.
Compiled from Mozilla stable source in Wary 0.9.2
get it here:
http://www.datafilehost.com/download-44902f67.html
I couldn't get it to build without the Quirky dbus stuff, so that is included in the pet. Should also work in Quirky, but haven't tested it in that as yet.
Thanks to Coolpup and Billtoo for their help with the build.
Compiled from Mozilla stable source in Wary 0.9.2
get it here:
http://www.datafilehost.com/download-44902f67.html
I couldn't get it to build without the Quirky dbus stuff, so that is included in the pet. Should also work in Quirky, but haven't tested it in that as yet.
Thanks to Coolpup and Billtoo for their help with the build.
Life is too short to spend it in front of a computer
Fresh frugal install of Wary 092 (2.6.34.6) on the old P3 test box. Working internet and sound on initial boot.
Had the same failure with the Video Upgrade as the live session last night.Used the PPM to download the package..........the only url working was nluug.nl ....probably explains the failure last night.
VIDEO REPORT: Wary Puppy, version 092
Chip description:
Intel Corporation 82810E DC-133 GMCH [Graphics Memory Controller Hub]
Intel Corporation 82810E DC-133 CGC [Chipset Graphics Controller]
Driver used by Xorg:
intel
Video mode used by Xorg:
Resolution: Depth 24 Depth: "Display"
...the above also recorded in /tmp/report-video
#
-Computer-
Processor : Pentium III (Coppermine)
Memory : 254MB (84MB used)
Operating System : Puppy Linux 0.09
User Name : root (root)
Date/Time : Sun 24 Oct 2010 04:27:06 PM CDT
-Display-
Resolution : 1024x768 pixels
OpenGL Renderer : Unknown
X11 Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
-Version-
Kernel : Linux 2.6.34.6 (i686)
Compiled : #1 SMP Fri Oct 22 10:15:31 GMT-8 2010
C Library : GNU C Library version 2.10.1 (stable)
Default C Compiler : Unknown
Distribution : Puppy Linux 0.09
-Current Session-
Computer Name : puppypc
User Name : root (root)
Home Directory : /root
Desktop Environment : Unknown (Window Manager: JWM)
Had the same failure with the Video Upgrade as the live session last night.Used the PPM to download the package..........the only url working was nluug.nl ....probably explains the failure last night.
VIDEO REPORT: Wary Puppy, version 092
Chip description:
Intel Corporation 82810E DC-133 GMCH [Graphics Memory Controller Hub]
Intel Corporation 82810E DC-133 CGC [Chipset Graphics Controller]
Driver used by Xorg:
intel
Video mode used by Xorg:
Resolution: Depth 24 Depth: "Display"
...the above also recorded in /tmp/report-video
#
-Computer-
Processor : Pentium III (Coppermine)
Memory : 254MB (84MB used)
Operating System : Puppy Linux 0.09
User Name : root (root)
Date/Time : Sun 24 Oct 2010 04:27:06 PM CDT
-Display-
Resolution : 1024x768 pixels
OpenGL Renderer : Unknown
X11 Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
-Version-
Kernel : Linux 2.6.34.6 (i686)
Compiled : #1 SMP Fri Oct 22 10:15:31 GMT-8 2010
C Library : GNU C Library version 2.10.1 (stable)
Default C Compiler : Unknown
Distribution : Puppy Linux 0.09
-Current Session-
Computer Name : puppypc
User Name : root (root)
Home Directory : /root
Desktop Environment : Unknown (Window Manager: JWM)
atom board test
Testing on the Atom board G945, no direct rendering reported. From xorg.conf:
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
(Fast display is not a big deal for me, actually.)
I tested Huawei modem with info:
T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=07 Cnt=01 Dev#= 3 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor=12d1 ProdID=1001 Rev= 0.00
S: Manufacturer=HUAWEI Technology
S: Product=HUAWEI Mobile
and was able to connect via both pgprs and wvdial (too slow data transfer, though, so it could be the fault of my ISP). Device was detected as /dev/ttyUSB0.
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
(Fast display is not a big deal for me, actually.)
I tested Huawei modem with info:
T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=07 Cnt=01 Dev#= 3 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor=12d1 ProdID=1001 Rev= 0.00
S: Manufacturer=HUAWEI Technology
S: Product=HUAWEI Mobile
and was able to connect via both pgprs and wvdial (too slow data transfer, though, so it could be the fault of my ISP). Device was detected as /dev/ttyUSB0.
Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? [url=http://puppylinux.info/topic/freeoffice-2012-sfs]Get the sfs (English only)[/url].
Nvidia pets do not work
Hm. It's strange. I tried both the 256... and 195... nvidia pets from PPM but got black screen.BarryK wrote:We have nVidia X PETs
Note that Wary-090 runs fine with nvidia 256-59... on the same machine (ASUS P4S8X-X, NV44a GeForce 6200).
- BarryK
- Puppy Master
- Posts: 9392
- Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 09:23
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
- Contact:
Guys, before I released 0.9.2, I checked OpenOffice and it worked. That was on my netbook.
However, on my main laptop it crashes.
The thing is, do we have a common factor here? Do you have Intel video? That is, you are using the 'intel' X driver -- look in /etc/X11/xorg.conf if you don't know.
However, on my main laptop it crashes.
The thing is, do we have a common factor here? Do you have Intel video? That is, you are using the 'intel' X driver -- look in /etc/X11/xorg.conf if you don't know.
[url]https://bkhome.org/news/[/url]
Certainly Intel video here. (Intel mobile graphics)BarryK wrote:Guys, before I released 0.9.2, I checked OpenOffice and it worked. That was on my netbook.
However, on my main laptop it crashes.
The thing is, do we have a common factor here? Do you have Intel video? That is, you are using the 'intel' X driver -- look in /etc/X11/xorg.conf if you don't know.
Code: Select all
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "intel" #card0driver
Option "LinearAlloc" "6144"
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "Mobile Integrated Graphics Controller"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Card0"
Monitor "Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 24
#Option "metamodes" "1280x800_60 +0+0" #METAMODES_0
Subsection "Display"
Depth 24
Modes "1280x800"
Having said that, video performance IS different between the two kernels with '30 seeming slower to redraw the screen.
Spup Frugal HD and USB
Root forever!
Root forever!
I am using playdayz Go Open Office 3.2.1 and it seems to be working fine.
I'll attach a full hardinfo report to see if anyone can spot any clues, but basically I am running an AMD X2 proccessor with an nforce chipset.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Oh yes, I compiled the very latest nvidia driver too, the one at the repo didn't work for me and was not recommended in the wizard.
See this post for the driver.
Cheers
I'll attach a full hardinfo report to see if anyone can spot any clues, but basically I am running an AMD X2 proccessor with an nforce chipset.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Oh yes, I compiled the very latest nvidia driver too, the one at the repo didn't work for me and was not recommended in the wizard.
See this post for the driver.
Cheers
- Attachments
-
- hardinfo_report.htm.gz
- (7.38 KiB) Downloaded 210 times
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access
OpenOffice crash on clean install but not on upgrade
I have done some more testing of the OpenOffice crash. Although OO crashes Wary on a clean install it does not crash on an upgrade using warysave.2fs from Wary 070.
Re: OpenOffice crash on clean install but not on upgrade
So it might be something to do with the way it creates (or not) its .config file. Will grab a .config from a working install and try it.Terryphi wrote:I have done some more testing of the OpenOffice crash. Although OO crashes Wary on a clean install it does not crash on an upgrade using warysave.2fs from Wary 070.
Spup Frugal HD and USB
Root forever!
Root forever!
Re: OpenOffice crash on clean install but not on upgrade
Nope! Still no go.....DaveS wrote:So it might be something to do with the way it creates (or not) its .config file. Will grab a .config from a working install and try it.Terryphi wrote:I have done some more testing of the OpenOffice crash. Although OO crashes Wary on a clean install it does not crash on an upgrade using warysave.2fs from Wary 070.
Spup Frugal HD and USB
Root forever!
Root forever!
- BarryK
- Puppy Master
- Posts: 9392
- Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 09:23
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
- Contact:
It is now gone for puppies that are built from PET packages, which is Wary and Puppy 4.x (and earlier). PETs are usually already stripped to the basics, whereas packages from Debian and Ubuntu etc. usually have lots of fat that can be trimmed.L18L wrote:trim the fat button exists no more at all
In Wary, you will in the 'puppy-wary5' repo that there are lots of _DOC, _NLS and _DEV PET packages, which are the already-separated components of the original packages.
[url]https://bkhome.org/news/[/url]
That error is not the problem. I get it but OO continues to load successfully using my warysave.2fs from Wary 070.tronkel wrote:Both OpenOffice and LibreOffice crash on my system. Video card is ATI Radeon 3450.
Starting from a terminal, output is:
domainname: applet not found.
Have googled around for this but haven't found much. Sounds like a java problem though.
I think you may be close to the answer with Java. I had Java unchecked in my 070 warysave file so perhaps on upgrade OO did not look for it and therefore did not cause a crash.
I was about to try that having convinced myself that the lack of Java in 092 was the cause of the problem. Expletive!DaveS wrote:Tried it with java installed. No better....
I don't think it is a kernel issue if I can run OO with an old warysave. I'll try to figure out what I have in it that makes the difference. Library or library version maybe?