The time now is Fri 24 May 2013, 05:45
All times are UTC - 4 |
| Author |
Message |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15109 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Thu 16 Oct 2008, 05:21 Post subject:
PHD Puppy Help Desk Subject description: Will talk Puppy bow wow for money or fish bones |
|
In a few months Eric (Caneri) will be offering a fast server
with a talk to 'Puppy Expert' facility running on it
A Live help desk
What does that mean?
It means newbies will be offered a new kennel facility
Click a button and talk to someone about Puppy
(using VOIP - Voice Over Internet Protocol)
We do have PSIP in Puppy 4.1 - a VOIP facility
and we have many knowledgeable people
I was supported by BarryK and GuestToo when I started with Puppy
and many other friendly kennel members
We all need
help with new computing directions and software . . .
I am not sure how this will all work out but Eric writes:
"The one thing is, we need "Operators" to answer help requests."
So please register your availability here and we can start
putting a wiki page together and developing the service
It is also possible that we might be able
to link to a voluntary 'tip' facility
where newbies can pay for any advice
on a voluntary basis to our volunteers.
_________________ Puppy WIKI
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
darrelljon

Joined: 08 Apr 2007 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Sun 19 Oct 2008, 13:40 Post subject:
|
|
Would it be possible for Puppy users willing to help others over VOIP if contact details were posted NOW?
I'm not sure if organisation is needed?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
alienjeff

Joined: 08 Jul 2006 Posts: 2290 Location: Winsted, CT - USA
|
Posted: Sun 19 Oct 2008, 14:20 Post subject:
|
|
_________________ hangout: ##arch-ftw on irc.freenode.net
diversion: http://alienjeff.net - visit The Fringe
quote: "The foundation of authority is based upon the consent of the people." - Thomas Hooker
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15109 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Sun 19 Oct 2008, 15:47 Post subject:
|
|
| darrelljon wrote: | Would it be possible for Puppy users willing to help others over VOIP if contact details were posted NOW?
I'm not sure if organisation is needed? |
If you have a SIP number - Puppy now has built in VOIP
you can offer help over VOIP
Maybe a link from here
http://www.puppylinux.org/wiki/applications/dot-pets/psip
I was hoping to be online a couple of hours a day but it does not always work out
It will take time and perseverance to get this going
_________________ Puppy WIKI
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
darrelljon

Joined: 08 Apr 2007 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Sun 01 Aug 2010, 08:37 Post subject:
|
|
Whatever happened to this?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15109 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Mon 02 Aug 2010, 06:38 Post subject:
|
|
A help desk would be great
Eric is busy farming
I can not get a mic to work with my set up
maybe with the Eeepc . . . m m m . . .
IRC now seems a friendly place to get advice.
Some very knowledgeable people there.
(Just click on Chat)
Skype is in Quickpet
Maybe we could try again?
_________________ Puppy WIKI
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
shariebeth
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 271 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Tue 03 Aug 2010, 09:42 Post subject:
|
|
| Lobster wrote: | IRC now seems a friendly place to get advice.
Some very knowledgeable people there.
(Just click on Chat) |
And just how long do you think that will last with the current level of disrespect they're getting from the two who have authority over that channel?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15109 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Thu 05 Aug 2010, 00:07 Post subject:
|
|
I expect IRC to be friendly as long as knowledgeable people
go there and are friendly and repectful or set up alternatives
that are enabled in this way.
What solution are you offering?
_________________ Puppy WIKI
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
shariebeth
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 271 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Thu 05 Aug 2010, 01:01 Post subject:
|
|
I am curious why people who have nothing to do with the channel or want nothing to do with the channel are still running the channel or making decisions about it. Sitting afk for days on end or making 5 minute appearances to op a 2 week old newcomer REALLY doesn't strike me as the best solution. No ops in the channel isn't very useful either.
The problem is no different than it has ever been. The "solutions" so far provided by those in charge have done nothing other than alienate the real helpers who have the real knowledge and spend or have spent significant amounts of time there helping.
Why haven't Rupp, samedog, Iguleder, and BigMike been opped? Why are none of the official representatives of puppy in there helping regularly? I don't see any of you who complain about the channel doing ANYTHING in there.
I do see a lot of strange inexplicable biased favoritism that alienates the people who have dedicated literally years to Puppy. If I see it and it angers me, imagine how they feel.
I've said this many times: you are wasting a valuable resource.
The solution:
Either put somebody in charge who gives a damn and can run it correctly, or close down the channel.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15109 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Thu 05 Aug 2010, 04:41 Post subject:
|
|
| Quote: | | I am curious why people who have nothing to do with the channel or want nothing to do with the channel are still running the channel or making decisions about it. |
Who are these people?
As far as I know J-Rey is running the IRC channel with Anacari and J-Rey updates the page on the wiki.
http://puppylinux.org/wikka/IRC
Who are the others?
What decisions should they be making?
As far as I know anyone can make and publicise an IRC channel.
| Quote: | | Sitting afk for days on end or making 5 minute appearances to op a 2 week old newcomer REALLY doesn't strike me as the best solution. No ops in the channel isn't very useful either. |
Maybe not. It may be the only resources available.
More ops required. Is that right?
Have you contacted J-Rey or anacari?
Created an alternative channel?
| Quote: | | The problem is no different than it has ever been. The "solutions" so far provided by those in charge have done nothing other than alienate the real helpers who have the real knowledge and spend or have spent significant amounts of time there helping. |
What else should/could they be doing?
Who has been alienated?
| Quote: | | Why haven't Rupp, samedog, Iguleder, and BigMike been opped? |
I would suggest you ask J-rey if this can be done
I can verify that Iguleder is often there with useful help and advice
(the others maybe too)
I am not sure how this opping is done.
| Quote: | | Why are none of the official representatives of puppy in there helping regularly? |
There are no officials, just volunteers.
Puppy experts choose to be elsewhere.
That is up to them.
| Quote: | | I don't see any of you who complain about the channel doing ANYTHING in there. |
I tend to go in anonymously
Have not been in much lately (Lucid was not going in automatically)
It seems more friendly and used
than it was a while ago . . .
| Quote: | | I do see a lot of strange inexplicable biased favoritism that alienates the people who have dedicated literally years to Puppy. If I see it and it angers me, imagine how they feel. |
LOL
I was banned from IRC
because it was hijacked by those
who made use of it.
I started the original IRC channel
because it was a big part of DSL
and I felt we needed a channel
You used to be able to connect from the forum
Who is being favoured? How?
Who is being excluded? How?
What is the solution?
Are people still pretending to be me or Barry
as recently happened on an IRC meet?
| Quote: |
I've said this many times: you are wasting a valuable resource. |
It is up to us to start a new working channel
Improve the one we have
Change the ops
etc.
Thanks for the suggestions
Puppy
Talked about Linux
_________________ Puppy WIKI
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
shariebeth
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 271 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Thu 05 Aug 2010, 08:01 Post subject:
|
|
| Lobster wrote: | Who are these people?
As far as I know J-Rey is running the IRC channel with Anacari and J-Rey updates the page on the wiki.
http://puppylinux.org/wikka/IRC
Who are the others?
What decisions should they be making?
As far as I know anyone can make and publicise an IRC channel. | Updating a wiki is not running the channel. Running the channel means you are there physically and mentally participating regularly, not afk or showing up randomly for a few minutes. It means you know your puppy stuff, and you know how to operate irc and do this pretty much every day. This is the channel included in the puppy distros, this is the channel that needs to operate correctly. This is not about making another channel.
19:30:18 freenode -- | ChanServ (ChanServ@services.): 1 T260G +vVoOtsriRfAF [modified 17 weeks, 2 days, 16:49:59 ago]
19:30:18 freenode -- | ChanServ (ChanServ@services.): 2 J_Rey +vVotsriRfAF [modified 17 weeks, 2 days, 15:41:34 ago]
19:30:18 freenode -- | ChanServ (ChanServ@services.): 3 *!*@freenode/staff/* +votiA [modified 17 weeks, 2 days, 17:41:38 ago]
19:30:18 freenode -- | ChanServ (ChanServ@services.): 4 DaySleeper555 +vVotiA [modified 12 weeks, 6 days, 01:42:57 ago]
19:30:18 freenode -- | ChanServ (ChanServ@services.): 5 paulhomebus +vVotiA [modified 5 days, 17:58:26 ago]
| Quote: | Maybe not. It may be the only resources available.
More ops required. Is that right?
Have you contacted J-Rey or anacari?
Created an alternative channel? | No these are not the only resources available. Why should I have to contact J_Rey? (and unless Anacari is yet another name of T260G, no idea what you are on about with that). He is supposed to be the one knowing what is going on, and there on a REGULAR basis. The appropriate channel is the one that is included within the puppy distro. As I said, either fix this one or get rid of it.
| Quote: | What else should/could they be doing?
Who has been alienated? | Many people, you haven't noticed many of the knowledgeable helpers are gone? How about the few I mentioned in my other post? Anybody who is worth a damn in the channel KNOWS who has been alienated and how.
| Quote: | I would suggest you ask J-rey if this can be done
I can verify that Iguleder is often there with useful help and advice
(the others maybe too)
I am not sure how this opping is done. | Again, I shouldn't have to ask J_Rey. He did op somebody...too bad he's playing politics as usual.
| Quote: | There are no officials, just volunteers.
Puppy experts choose to be elsewhere.
That is up to them. | Yes I know that, that is what I am asking, why do they complain but not help? I am asking this of the accepted established puppy hierarchy: devs, creator, general puppy contributors who have participated in the bashing of said channel and some GOOD helpers, yet can't be bothered to participate in it. My opinion: if you don't want to particpate and help, stfu and let people who do, run it.
| Quote: | I tend to go in anonymously
Have not been in much lately (Lucid was not going in automatically)
It seems more friendly and used
than it was a while ago . . . | If ever I disagreed with you, it is on this statement. It is a disgrace in there now. Less users, less helpers, less knowledge, and some downright unpleasant favored users.
| Quote: |
LOL
I was banned from IRC
because it was hijacked by those
who made use of it.
I started the original IRC channel
because it was a big part of DSL
and I felt we needed a channel
You used to be able to connect from the forum
Who is being favoured? How?
Who is being excluded? How?
What is the solution?
Are people still pretending to be me or Barry
as recently happened on an IRC meet? | I can't comment on your banning, I was not here for that sadly.
As to the meeting? My honest opinion? You personally were late, no ops were assigned to be in the channel, the people who went had NO clue how to even log in, let alone run the meeting, or control it. It was a disgrace and THAT had nothing to do with people logging in with a Barry name.
| Quote: | | It is up to us to start a new working channel | No. Any idiot can start a channel, and has. It doesn't work. The one endorsed by Puppy by virtue of being included in the distro needs to be fixed or removed completely.
| Quote: | Thanks for the suggestions | Let me tell you something. You probably hate seeing my posts. You probably hate that I upset the applecart more often than not. Just remember that if I didn't care and feel so strongly about how this channel has been grossly mismanaged, and feel so strongly about puppy and the people who have been abused by certain others, I wouldn't be here fighting for them.
I also believe that J_Rey is the one who should be addressing these issues, not you. According to T260G, he is the big cahuna now for this channel. Hopefully he can give better explanations than he did last time he deigned to show up. Vague brush-offs about how he's tired of hearing complaints (rosco? Seriously?) and too busy to investigate (Why is he in charge then?) DO NOT CUT IT. For the last time, either get some people who CAN, or get rid of the channel. There is no reason freenode staffers should be handling puppy matters. They seem to be violating their own policy by doing so. Interesting ehh?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15109 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Thu 05 Aug 2010, 10:09 Post subject:
|
|
| shariebeth wrote: |
Updating a wiki is not running the channel.
|
No indeed.
That is however what is presented and what I know
which admittedly is not much.
I am certainly no expert on running a channel
| Quote: | | Running the channel means you are there physically and mentally participating regularly, not afk or showing up randomly for a few minutes. |
That would seem reasonable.
When I started the initial channel that is what happened
| Quote: | | It means you know your puppy stuff, and you know how to operate irc and do this pretty much every day. This is the channel included in the puppy distros, this is the channel that needs to operate correctly. This is not about making another channel. |
Well I have mentioned for years that efforts
should be made to move to jabber
- However I do not have the knowledge.
I also feel there are different ideas of 'correctly'
I accept that there is a problem (not for everyone)
Now we need the potential solutions and how they are
to be implemented?
| Quote: | Why should I have to contact J_Rey? (and unless Anacari is yet another name of T260G, no idea what you are on about with that).
|
I thought maybe you wished to run the channel
or suggest people who can be op?
These are the two people according to the wiki who are running IRC
You seem very angry about an IRC channel that seems to have
improved considerably.
| Quote: | | He is supposed to be the one knowing what is going on, and there on a REGULAR basis. |
Again if we have people who are or intend to be regulars
then perhaps there is way to ensure their ability to run IRC
(if that is possible)
| Quote: | | The appropriate channel is the one that is included within the puppy distro. As I said, either fix this one or get rid of it. |
Are there any other options?
I was there today and people seemed to be doing OK
Getting and giving advice.
Then I was kicked off and could not return.
Is this part of the alienation process you mention?
| Quote: | | Many people, you haven't noticed many of the knowledgeable helpers are gone? |
There were many names on IRC whilst I was there
Some creating noise, some giving advice
Some glad to receive it.
etc.
Seemed normal enough
- However first time I have been in for several weeks
| Quote: | | How about the few I mentioned in my other post? Anybody who is worth a damn in the channel KNOWS who has been alienated and how. |
Either they will tell us or you might.
Otherwise the information remains closed source . . .
| Quote: | | Again, I shouldn't have to ask J_Rey. He did op somebody...too bad he's playing politics as usual. |
So J_Rey does do a little work on IRC?
Is there anyone available who is willing or able to do more
that you are aware of?
| Quote: | | Quote: | There are no officials, just volunteers.
Puppy experts choose to be elsewhere.
That is up to them. | Yes I know that, that is what I am asking, why do they complain but not help? |
Because it is easier.
| Quote: | | if you don't want to particpate and help, stfu and let people who do, run it. |
Many thanks for your insights.
I am not quite sure what you are offering as a solution?
_________________ Puppy WIKI
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
shariebeth
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 271 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Thu 05 Aug 2010, 15:00 Post subject:
|
|
I think at this point it is J_Rey who needs to be responding. He needs to address the issues presented and he needs to correct a few things.
If he is unwilling or unable to do so, I think #p should be pulled out of all of the distro releases and a new puppy linux channel should be created that is not included in any distro, at least until it has proven to be stable and better run.
It should remain with freenode in my opinion, because most users find need of the other help channels that are located on this network.
As to who should|would|could start a new one? I think that will sort itself out naturally. I expect a few channels would start up and it would end up being a survival of the fittest.
What users will define as "fit" remains to be seen.
The problem with starting a new channel currently, is that new users are still being sent into #p. Willing, active, and experienced helpers would be divided and there simply are not enough for that.
Also a note for anyone reading who IS involved with #p on any level...off-topic chat most definitely should be allowed. It is what keeps the helpers interested and active in the channel for when users do come in. Disallow that and your helpers will become bored and leave (or go afk). That simple.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
tlchost
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 1486 Location: Baltimore, Maryland USA
|
Posted: Thu 05 Aug 2010, 17:30 Post subject:
|
|
| shariebeth wrote: |
As to who should|would|could start a new one? I think that will sort itself out naturally. I expect a few channels would start up and it would end up being a survival of the fittest.
What users will define as "fit" remains to be seen.  |
A few of us did attempt to start another channel....but new and old users were sent to #puppylinux by custom and the default values in IRC clients distributed in Puppy.
With absent "ownership" and channel ops not pro-actively participating, #puppylinux remains a frustration for many users.
Thom
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|