Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Sun 09 Mar 2014, 17:34
All times are UTC - 4

 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Additional Software (PETs, n' stuff) » Desktop
Glipper-lite
Post_new_topic   Reply_to_topic View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic
Page 2 of 4 Posts_count   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Author Message
amigo

Joined: 02 Apr 2007
Posts: 2134
PostPosted: Sat 13 Feb 2010, 04:08    Post_subject:  
Yeah, creating full-folder diffs is a pain sometimes. Try running configure and then 'make distclean' in the 'raw' sources to help cut down the numbers.
If you have only modified a couple of files, I find it easier to use 'gendiff' which comes with rpm:
Code:
#!/bin/sh

[ -z "$1" -o -z "$2" ] && {
# usage
  echo "usage: $0 <directory> <diff-extension>" 1>&2
  exit 1
}

find $1 \( -name "*$2" -o -name ".*$2" \) -print |
while read f; do
    U=-u
    [ "`basename $f`" = "ChangeLog$2" ] && U=-U0
#    diff ${U} $f `echo $f | sed s/$2\$//`
    if [ -r "$f" ]; then
   diff ${U} "${f}" "${f%$2}"
    else
   diff ${U} /dev/null "${f%$2}"
    fi
done


To use it, simply create copies of the original files with a suffix like '.00' and place them in the edited sources. Then, from the topdir of the edited sources run:
gendiff . .00 > name-of-patch

Sometimes I go through both trees of sources and remove files from both which are showing up in the diff but which are not pertinent to the changes -like Makefile.in autogen.sh, etc. This case is a typical example of comparing incomplete autoconf sources(from CVS or other -hence the autogen.sh) against sources which have already had their conf files regenerated and then edited as well.

You can also manually cut and remove the sections of the diff which don't matter. If you can't figure it out, attach the big diff and I'll cut it down to size for you. I've gotten pretty handy at it after a few hundred times of dissecting debian patches which typically run in the 250-300 thousand lines (exactly because they always include 'debianized' config.guess, config.sub and all the Makefile.in files which are not often essential to the source code changes).

A few runs of this sort (run in both trees) can help a lot:
find -name Makefile.in -exe rm -f {} \;
find -name "*~" -exe rm -f {} \;
find -name CVS -exe rm -rf {} \;
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
disciple

Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 6337
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
PostPosted: Sat 13 Feb 2010, 05:54    Post_subject:  
Quote:
Try running configure... in the 'raw' sources to help cut down the numbers.

Ah, I should have thought of that Smile Still had to delete a few thousand lines though.

This patch seems to work.

Now, I think the answer to my question about the .po files is yes, edit them manually, but also do this https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454894#c6
Perhaps someone can check that the locales are actually working now?
glipper-lite_NLS.pet
Description 
pet

 Download 
Filename  glipper-lite_NLS.pet 
Filesize  5.94 KB 
Downloaded  404 Time(s) 
glipper-lite.pet
Description 
pet

 Download 
Filename  glipper-lite.pet 
Filesize  18.8 KB 
Downloaded  476 Time(s) 
glipper-gtkbuilder.diff.gz
Description 
gz

 Download 
Filename  glipper-gtkbuilder.diff.gz 
Filesize  8.23 KB 
Downloaded  383 Time(s) 

_________________
DEATH TO SPREADSHEETS
- - -
Classic Puppy quotes
- - -
Beware the demented serfers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
amigo

Joined: 02 Apr 2007
Posts: 2134
PostPosted: Sat 13 Feb 2010, 07:27    Post_subject:  
The bugzilla link is broken. Oops, got it now -there was hidden window about the outdated security certificate...
Looks to me like you may need to be using a late version of intltool to make it work intltool-0.41 can be found through ubuntu.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
aragon

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Posts: 1695
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Sat 13 Feb 2010, 09:48    Post_subject:  
disciple wrote:
Perhaps someone can check that the locales are actually working now?

Your wish is my command. Rolling Eyes
German does work.

aragon
_________________
PUPPY SEARCH: http://wellminded.com/puppy/pupsearch.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
amigo

Joined: 02 Apr 2007
Posts: 2134
PostPosted: Sat 13 Feb 2010, 10:13    Post_subject:  
Shouldn't that be 'Your wish is my command-line' ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
aragon

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Posts: 1695
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Sat 13 Feb 2010, 11:07    Post_subject:  
amigo wrote:
Shouldn't that be 'Your wish is my command-line' ?

dict.leo.org does not know of this one...

aragon
_________________
PUPPY SEARCH: http://wellminded.com/puppy/pupsearch.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
amigo

Joined: 02 Apr 2007
Posts: 2134
PostPosted: Sat 13 Feb 2010, 11:53    Post_subject:  
Dein Wunsch ist mein Befehl?? I was just kidding aragon, you used it just right.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
disciple

Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 6337
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
PostPosted: Sat 13 Feb 2010, 16:41    Post_subject:  
Thanks Aragon.
_________________
DEATH TO SPREADSHEETS
- - -
Classic Puppy quotes
- - -
Beware the demented serfers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
disciple

Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 6337
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
PostPosted: Sat 13 Feb 2010, 22:49    Post_subject:  
Sorry aragon, I'm not certain that I was specific enough. Can you please confirm that the German works in the preferences dialogue?
Thanks.
_________________
DEATH TO SPREADSHEETS
- - -
Classic Puppy quotes
- - -
Beware the demented serfers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
aragon

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Posts: 1695
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Mon 15 Feb 2010, 05:01    Post_subject:  
amigo wrote:
Dein Wunsch ist mein Befehl?? I was just kidding aragon, you used it just right.

gotcha Laughing

aragon
_________________
PUPPY SEARCH: http://wellminded.com/puppy/pupsearch.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
aragon

Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Posts: 1695
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Mon 15 Feb 2010, 05:06    Post_subject:  
disciple wrote:
Sorry aragon, I'm not certain that I was specific enough. Can you please confirm that the German works in the preferences dialogue?
Thanks.

no problem. Yes german works in prefs-dialogue.

aragon
_________________
PUPPY SEARCH: http://wellminded.com/puppy/pupsearch.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
disciple

Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 6337
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
PostPosted: Tue 16 Feb 2010, 03:32    Post_subject:  
Fantastic, thanks!
_________________
DEATH TO SPREADSHEETS
- - -
Classic Puppy quotes
- - -
Beware the demented serfers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
Dingo


Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 1410
Location: somewhere at the end of rainbow...
PostPosted: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 20:07    Post_subject:  
I compiled this version of glipper (1.0) for Puppy 3.01

it seems, however that the size is more bigger than your builds (in Puppy higher than 3.01)

keeping the default CFLAGS in makefile, my glipper executable consists in:

- 1250 KB
- 1028 KB after stripping (-strip --strip-unneeded)
- 404 KB (after compression with upx)

while glipper 0.89 compiled originally by Barry Kauler is only 14 KB!

I have seen several other times that compiler in Puppy 3.01 produces executable bigger than other devx in higher puppies
_________________
replace .co.cc with .info to get access to stuff I posted in forum
dropbox 2GB free
OpenOffice for Puppy Linux
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message Visit_website 
technosaurus


Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 4125
PostPosted: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 21:51    Post_subject:  
it sounds like you may be missing a .so... or more than 1 due to paths etc... the compiler is using one or more of your .a files

putting .so symlinks in usr/lib may fix ... and may give some ignorable relocation warnings

or more likely the devx has header files and static libs for which the main sfs has no shared counterpart... then configure will autodetect a lib that you don't really want or need
_________________
Web Programming - Pet Packaging 100 & 101
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
disciple

Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 6337
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
PostPosted: Fri 25 Mar 2011, 18:27    Post_subject:  
Dingo wrote:
I compiled this version of glipper (1.0) for Puppy 3.01

it seems, however that the size is more bigger than your builds (in Puppy higher than 3.01)

keeping the default CFLAGS in makefile, my glipper executable consists in:

- 1250 KB
- 1028 KB after stripping (-strip --strip-unneeded)
- 404 KB (after compression with upx)

while glipper 0.89 compiled originally by Barry Kauler is only 14 KB!

I have seen several other times that compiler in Puppy 3.01 produces executable bigger than other devx in higher puppies

Glipper 1.0 was rewritten in python so is completely different. It doesn't even have an executable for you to strip and upx, does it?
_________________
DEATH TO SPREADSHEETS
- - -
Classic Puppy quotes
- - -
Beware the demented serfers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
Display_posts:   Sort by:   
Page 2 of 4 Posts_count   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Post_new_topic   Reply_to_topic View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Additional Software (PETs, n' stuff) » Desktop
Jump to:  


Rules_post_cannot
Rules_reply_cannot
Rules_edit_cannot
Rules_delete_cannot
Rules_vote_cannot
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

[ Time: 0.0807s ][ Queries: 13 (0.0090s) ][ GZIP on ]