Which OpenOffice for Puppy 4.2.1 on old Compaq?

Booting, installing, newbie
Post Reply
Message
Author
nat geo fan
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat 24 Oct 2009, 10:14

Which OpenOffice for Puppy 4.2.1 on old Compaq?

#1 Post by nat geo fan »

I have an old compaq running puppy 4.2.1 and I wanted to know what version of OpenOffice.org to install. Before I installed puppy it was running windows 98. It's a Compaq Presario 1694.

User avatar
moogsydodong
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon 16 Mar 2009, 10:35
Location: Tagum City, Davao del Norte, Mindanao, Philippines

#2 Post by moogsydodong »

hi nat geo fan,

you can use this
http://puppylinux.asia/tpp/NOP/OpenOffi ... ma_413.sfs

hope that helps...
...SHUT UP AND LISTEN!!!...In a battle there is only ONE COMMANDER!!!

User avatar
Dingo
Posts: 1437
Joined: Tue 11 Dec 2007, 17:48
Location: somewhere at the end of rainbow...
Contact:

Re: Open office on a compaq

#3 Post by Dingo »

nat geo fan wrote:I have an old compaq running puppy 4.2.1 and I wanted to know what version of OpenOffice.org to install. Before I installed puppy it was running windows 98. It's a Compaq Presario 1694.
latest releases may be too much haevy for your compaq, if they are, you can try an ancient version of openoffice:

*OpenOffice 1.1.5* (outdated, for very old hardware unsupporting newer versions)
- http://puppylover.netsons.org/dokupuppy ... fice_suite
replace .co.cc with .info to get access to stuff I posted in forum
dropbox 2GB free
OpenOffice for Puppy Linux

MAMAS
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat 24 Oct 2009, 12:47

Office suite

#4 Post by MAMAS »

You might want to have a look at softmaker office at www.softmaker.de, a Germany based software development compayn. I do believe they're giving their older versions away for free, wayyyyyyyyyyyyy smaller, faster and more stable than openoffice. You just might want to drop them an email.

PupGeek
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun 06 Sep 2009, 11:30

#5 Post by PupGeek »

I use OO 3.0.1 and pup 4.2 on my ten year old dellasaurus.

User avatar
Makoto
Posts: 1665
Joined: Fri 04 Sep 2009, 01:30
Location: Out wandering... maybe.

#6 Post by Makoto »

Do you have a fair amount of RAM and hard drive space? OO.o 3 also seems to 'require' Java be installed (it wasn't absolutely necessary for 1 and 2... I think it's used mainly for the Excel clone, can't remember the name off the top of my head, though. Calc? Not sure about 3.)

OpenOffice 3 seemed to load on the old PC on which I'm using Puppy 4.2.1 - it used to be a WinME tower, though I've got a Win98 setup in it. However, I don't have Java installed in Puppy, so the initial wizard wouldn't let me continue.
[ Puppy 4.3.1 JP, Frugal install ] * [ XenialPup 7.5, Frugal install ] * [XenialPup 64 7.5, Frugal install] * [ 4GB RAM | 512MB swap ]
In memory of our beloved American Eskimo puppy (1995-2010) and black Lab puppy (1997-2011).

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#7 Post by mikeb »

OO.o 3 also seems to 'require' Java be installed (it wasn't absolutely necessary for 1 and 2.
hmm I managed to get it launching without java...it just complained. Also there is an option in preferences to disable java then the complaints stopped...perhaps that option could be manually altered.

I have been using varsion 1 mainly as I'm not needing the latest compatability with windows and as such its still a pretty useful program and does not have to have java or that other thing thats quite big that I cannot remember the name of. After all I can create and edit documents and make tham pretty....I don't even know what the extra stuff is for.
By the way the default interface is much better than version 3....and gtk2 just looks sooo bulky.

mike

User avatar
DaveS
Posts: 3685
Joined: Thu 09 Oct 2008, 16:01
Location: UK

#8 Post by DaveS »

mikeb wrote:
OO.o 3 also seems to 'require' Java be installed (it wasn't absolutely necessary for 1 and 2.
hmm I managed to get it launching without java...it just complained. Also there is an option in preferences to disable java then the complaints stopped...perhaps that option could be manually altered.

I have been using varsion 1 mainly as I'm not needing the latest compatability with windows and as such its still a pretty useful program and does not have to have java or that other thing thats quite big that I cannot remember the name of. After all I can create and edit documents and make tham pretty....I don't even know what the extra stuff is for.
By the way the default interface is much better than version 3....and gtk2 just looks sooo bulky.

mike
Java is required for the database app.
Spup Frugal HD and USB
Root forever!

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#9 Post by mikeb »

Java is required for the database app.
ah ha....I use scraps of paper and a dodgy memory :D

mike

mcewanw
Posts: 3169
Joined: Thu 16 Aug 2007, 10:48
Contact:

Re: Office suite

#10 Post by mcewanw »

MAMAS wrote:You might want to have a look at softmaker office at www.softmaker.de
http://go-oo.org/ apparently provide a faster OpenOffice

As for Softmaker:

From all accounts Softmaker is a very slim, fast, and excellent MS compatible product. But they are only offering their old Windows OS version of Softmaker Office for free. Interestingly, it is not only quite small in install and memory hog size, but is also able to be run as a portable app. My hope is that it will will work with wine

http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=37783

(I'm downloading Softmaker Office 2006 right now, by slow dialup modem..., so that I can try that).

I've also come across an Ashampoo rebranded version of the latest Softmaker Office (also just for Windows OS though - hope it works with wine), for which there appears to be a free license key available from Softmaker's site (maybe just a short term promotion). The following are the relevant web links:

http://www.softmakeroffice.com/

http://www.app-stick.com/appDetail.php?appid=softmaker

http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/07/1 ... ey-number/

http://www.softmaker.de/reg/ash08_en.htm
github mcewanw

mcewanw
Posts: 3169
Joined: Thu 16 Aug 2007, 10:48
Contact:

Softmaker Office

#11 Post by mcewanw »

Unfortunately Softmaker Office 2006 installer crashed when I just now ran it with wine. Haven't persevered with it though, so perhaps it could still be made to work...?

EDIT: The attempt ate up a lot of my free pupsave space, but I brought it back to normal by just deleting some junk that had been left by softmaker install program in ~/.wine/drive_c/windows/temp/
github mcewanw

PupGeek
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun 06 Sep 2009, 11:30

Re: Softmaker Office

#12 Post by PupGeek »

mcewanw wrote:Unfortunately Softmaker Office 2006 installer crashed when I just now ran it with wine. Haven't persevered with it though, so perhaps it could still be made to work...?

EDIT: The attempt ate up a lot of my free pupsave space, but I brought it back to normal by just deleting some junk that had been left by softmaker install program in ~/.wine/drive_c/windows/temp/
One solution can be to resize your pup_save file.... Alternatively, you can move your ~/.wine directory to a location outside the pup_save file (such as /mnt/sda1) and symlink it back in to your ~ directory. That way you are not restricted by the size of your pup_save file.

Other than that, you can try the OxygenOffice (OpenOffice with additional templates and stuff) that I use.... you can get it here http://www.ecomoney.eu/puppy/sfs/oxygen ... 01_420.sfs

Right click on the .sfs file and select "mount and use with load_sfs" to try it out. If it performs ok for you and you wish to have it mounted automatically at startup, just change the "_420" in the .sfs's filename to "_421", keeping everything else the same.

User avatar
mikeb
Posts: 11297
Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006, 13:56

#13 Post by mikeb »

Unfortunately Softmaker Office 2006 installer crashed when I just now ran it with wine. Haven't persevered with it though, so perhaps it could still be made to work...?
It may work by installing in windows and then manually copying over the install to wine including registry entries if needed

mike

PupGeek
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun 06 Sep 2009, 11:30

#14 Post by PupGeek »

Actually mike, I think the problem was that the pup_save file ran out of space and the installation could not complete.

mcewanw
Posts: 3169
Joined: Thu 16 Aug 2007, 10:48
Contact:

#15 Post by mcewanw »

PupGeek wrote:Actually mike, I think the problem was that the pup_save file ran out of space and the installation could not complete.
No, the pup_save didn't run out of space. Though the crashed installation did leave behind a lot of stuff in the wine windows temp folder there was still a couple of hundred MB left in my pup_save so that isn't/wasn't the reason for the installation failing.
github mcewanw

PupGeek
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun 06 Sep 2009, 11:30

#16 Post by PupGeek »

in that case maybe you should check what version of windows that program was made for and use winecfg to make special configurations for it. if your wine is default set for xp and the program needs win98 or something that could be the problem

mcewanw
Posts: 3169
Joined: Thu 16 Aug 2007, 10:48
Contact:

softmaker office working over wine

#17 Post by mcewanw »

I managed to get softmaker office 2008 working as a portable app over wine as described here:

http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 254#355254
github mcewanw

Post Reply