| Author |
Message |
BarryK
Puppy Master

Joined: 09 May 2005 Posts: 6874 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Wed 16 May 2007, 19:24 Post subject:
|
|
| Dougal wrote: | Barry, I don't think you used the my latest update of the installer -- the USB HD problem was solved after people sent me the results of the HW-test dotpup and I found that removable HDs are actually recognized as non-removable.
Why have you added the grub-style device names in the grub entries (initrd hd(0,0)/boot/initrd.gz)? it has been working fine for me all this time without them (initrd /boot/initrd.gz). |
Dougal, I just did very quick hacks with what I knew worked. People were complaining about install paths, so I also took out the /boot/puppy216.
I didn't use your latest as the comment at the top stated that you had implemented something -- I forget now -- anyway, I didn't realise there were other changes. If I recall, I used your vesion of 9thMay.
If that removable/non-removable flag can be used to distinguish between USB Flash and HDDs, that is great.
I've been delaying release of 2.16, too long. It's coming out today as-is. The Installer is a continually evolving project and updates will of course be available in the future.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
tytower
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 440 Location: Green Island Cairns for the winter
|
Posted: Wed 16 May 2007, 19:32 Post subject:
|
|
Err If it don't work, dont release it ,you are only harming yourself. Whats the rush anyway?
2.15CE has now not worked for me in two vital areas , audio sound board not recognised and now a problem with the universal installer.
I see a hack is required for another vital area ,the modem.
Crikey !
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GuestToo
Puppy Master
Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 4078
|
Posted: Wed 16 May 2007, 21:48 Post subject:
|
|
i find that often about 80% of the time required to make a package is in debugging and polishing, to make sure it works properly in every case
if i were putting together a distro, it would be ready when it was ready ... i wouldn't feel pressured to meet an arbitrary deadline, unless there actually was a real deadline that actually had to be met
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
pakt

Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 1089 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Thu 17 May 2007, 05:06 Post subject:
|
|
I agree that skipping over this Universal Installer issue just to rush 2.16 out the door is not the way to go.
_________________ Testing Puppy since v0.9.2 - my desktop OS since v1.0.7
Running SlaxerPup-4.12 - Puppy with a Slackware 12.2 heart 
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
alienjeff

Joined: 08 Jul 2006 Posts: 2290 Location: Winsted, CT - USA
|
Posted: Thu 17 May 2007, 06:38 Post subject:
|
|
Calm down! So what if the Universal Installer doesn't work as "advertised." Get a grip, for goodness sake. At least it isn't something important ...
Look on the bright side: the eight calculators and seventeen text editors all work fine!
</sarcasm>
_________________ hangout: ##arch-ftw on irc.freenode.net
diversion: http://alienjeff.net - visit The Fringe
quote: "The foundation of authority is based upon the consent of the people." - Thomas Hooker
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Gn2

Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Posts: 936 Location: virtual - Veni vidi, nihil est adpulerit
|
Posted: Thu 17 May 2007, 07:21 Post subject:
|
|
Think of it as a "positive":
If it can't be installed - it positively eliminates frets over not shutting down - clean or otherwise !
Calculated in eight weighs or naught_
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Leon
Joined: 22 Jun 2005 Posts: 217 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Thu 17 May 2007, 08:10 Post subject:
|
|
I take it as a spirit of puppy that inspired this distribution.
I take it as it is, with its good things and its problems.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BarryK
Puppy Master

Joined: 09 May 2005 Posts: 6874 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Thu 17 May 2007, 19:34 Post subject:
|
|
Tch, tch, guys, the Universal Installer shipped in 2.16final does work. Dougal and I were discussing fine points that will improve it.
Regarding "shipping when it's ready", well, although some projects claim that's what they do, what they really mean is "ship it when the bugs have reduced to a passable level". All major projects ship with known bugs!
I didn't ship 2.16 to meet a deadline. I decided it is ready, and decided that outstanding issues were small enough to leave for now. I have a small list of known bugs also, that I consider small enough or unlikely to be encountered in most cases.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|