The time now is Sun 24 Jan 2021, 06:05
All times are UTC - 4 |
Page 1 of 3 [37 Posts] |
Goto page: 1, 2, 3 Next |
Author |
Message |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Fri 24 Apr 2020, 08:46 Post subject:
UPupEF-20.04+5 (27-Jun-2020) (UPup Eoan-Focal) Subject description: 32 bit Woof-CE build using Ubuntu Focal Fossa & Eoan Ermine components |
|
ce30c850e4b7b0d152e0f36665d2ee8c UPupEF-20.04+5.iso
Kernel 4.14.176 32-bit pae
Description |
|
Filesize |
244.23 KB |
Viewed |
3463 Time(s) |

|
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Last edited by peebee on Sat 27 Jun 2020, 06:28; edited 7 times in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Fri 24 Apr 2020, 08:46 Post subject:
|
|
reserved
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Fri 24 Apr 2020, 08:46 Post subject:
|
|
reserved
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Fri 24 Apr 2020, 08:46 Post subject:
|
|
reserved
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
salvotnt
Joined: 25 Apr 2020 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Sat 25 Apr 2020, 12:50 Post subject:
|
|
hello
test on vmware:
20.04+0 hang on boot, after module loading.
release candidate rc4 work very well.
on intel celeron 4core and integrated graphic hd500
bye
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Marv

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 1265 Location: SW Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat 25 Apr 2020, 19:19 Post subject:
|
|
UPupEF-20.04+0 up and running on my i5 based Fujitsu S761s and a core 2 duo based Fujitsu T5010. In all cases it is an update from RC4. Boot is clean, video and sound is good on all, mitigation as expected from a 32b kernel, and with the exception of the core 2 duo (has a pcie memory allocation error present in all recent pups and kernels I've tried) dmesg is pretty clean and unchanged from EE. CPU and mem use at idle is excellent. General usability also is excellent except that as with the RC upupEFs, I continue to have page load failures using SlimJet 26.0.3.0, chrome 80 based, run-as-spot from SFS that I do not have in upupEE or any of the slackware based LxPups. Kernel swaps don't change the behavior at all. I may have a go at the alpha 64b fossil pup and see if they show up there. I have and use a 64b 26.0.3.0 Slimjet SFS I use in LxPupSc64...
Update: Not an apples-to-apples comparison, but I did install and set up fossapup64 9.01 and run my 64b Slimjet 26.0.3.0 run-as-spot from SFS (only had to add in libffi). No page fails there. Runs very well in that environment.
Cheers,
_________________ Pups currently in kennel Older LxPupSc and X-slacko-4.4 for my users; LxPupSc, LxPupSc64 and upupEF for me. All good pups indeed, and all running savefiles for look'n'feel only. Browsers, etc. solely from SFS.
Last edited by Marv on Wed 29 Apr 2020, 12:14; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
salvotnt
Joined: 25 Apr 2020 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed 29 Apr 2020, 04:54 Post subject:
|
|
tested on atom 1core/2treads 1.33ghz, netbook with intel gma500 pulsbo :
It's work very well , ppm slowdown the whole system on repo switch, firefox 69 haven't sound
palemoon 28 pet , work very well
ciao from Italy
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Thu 30 Apr 2020, 13:59 Post subject:
|
|
30-Apr-2020
+1 update available - both Ubuntu and Woof-CE updates. See post #1
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
salvotnt
Joined: 25 Apr 2020 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Fri 01 May 2020, 04:35 Post subject:
|
|
at PeeBee
ligth browser dependency for play youtube videos, which ones are they?
thanks
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Fri 01 May 2020, 14:38 Post subject:
|
|
salvotnt wrote: | at PeeBee
ligth browser dependency for play youtube videos, which ones are they?
thanks |
Hi
Light is a light web browser as its name implies..... you should install another heavyweight browser for apps like YouTube - see menu Internet -> Get web browser.
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Fri 01 May 2020, 15:59 Post subject:
|
|
Marv wrote: | I continue to have page load failures using SlimJet 26.0.3.0, chrome 80 based, run-as-spot from SFS that I do not have in upupEE or any of the slackware based LxPups. |
Hi @Marv
The Aw Snap! problems are apparently due to changes introduced in GLibc-2.31 which the 32-bit Chromium code does not expect and cannot cope with.
https://github.com/OSSystems/meta-browser/issues/357 describes.
A temporary work around until Chromium and its derivatives catch up is to add:
--disable-seccomp-filter-sandbox --test-type
[edited] switch to the command line.
Only UPupEF currently has GLibc-2.31. As other builds update to GLibc-2.31 then the problem will emerge in them as well. I will think about reverting to GLibc-2.30 pro tem but this might introduce other incompatibilities.
Cheers
peebee & thanks 666philb
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Last edited by peebee on Fri 01 May 2020, 17:46; edited 2 times in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
666philb

Joined: 07 Feb 2010 Posts: 3635 Location: wales ... by the sea
|
Posted: Fri 01 May 2020, 16:07 Post subject:
|
|
peebee wrote: | Marv wrote: | I continue to have page load failures using SlimJet 26.0.3.0, chrome 80 based, run-as-spot from SFS that I do not have in upupEE or any of the slackware based LxPups. |
Hi @Marv
The Aw Snap! problems are apparently due to changes introduced in GLibc-2.31 which the 32-bit Chromium code does not expect and cannot cope with.
https://github.com/OSSystems/meta-browser/issues/357 describes.
A temporary work around until Chromium and its derivatives catch up is to add:
--disable-seccomp-filter-sandbox
switch to the command line, but this causes annoying security warnings to appear but only once on startup of the browser.
Only UPupEF currently has GLibc-2.31. As other builds update to GLibc-2.31 then the problem will emerge in them as well. I will think about reverting to GLibc-2.30 pro tem but this might introduce other incompatibilities.
Cheers
peebee |
i got rid of the warning message in chromium with --test-type ie Code: | /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome --no-sandbox --test-type |
_________________ Bionicpup64 built with bionic beaver packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=114311
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Marv

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 1265 Location: SW Wisconsin
|
Posted: Fri 01 May 2020, 17:31 Post subject:
|
|
So far so good. Running 32b Slimjet 26.0.3.0 in UPupEF-20.04 with the following line in the flashpeak-slimjet launch script Code: | exec -a "$0" /opt/slimjet/slimjet --user-data-dir=/root/spot/.config/slimjet --disable-seccomp-filter-sandbox --test-type "$@" | No page load failures seen as yet. I just looked at a few places where I had them quite quickly before and saw none.
Thanks to peebee and 666philb for the workarounds.
Edit: 20.04 +0 updated to 20.04 +1. All system checks, resource use, and video speeds remain good. Played a bit with windows color themes and clock font. Usability continues to be excellent, no Aw Snaps at all seen using the workaround above.
Cheers,
_________________ Pups currently in kennel Older LxPupSc and X-slacko-4.4 for my users; LxPupSc, LxPupSc64 and upupEF for me. All good pups indeed, and all running savefiles for look'n'feel only. Browsers, etc. solely from SFS.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Sun 17 May 2020, 02:21 Post subject:
|
|
24-May-2020
+3 update available - both Ubuntu and Woof-CE updates. See post #1
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Last edited by peebee on Sun 24 May 2020, 12:50; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Marv

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 1265 Location: SW Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sun 17 May 2020, 19:23 Post subject:
|
|
+2 installed on the second gen i5 based Fujitsu S761 laptop. Frugal Grub4Dos installs to SSD, first as a pristine install, then as an update of +1. Both boot cleanly, touchpad (using the synaptics driver in this pup) and keyboard (capslock disabled) set up correctly, glxgears FPS and SSD/memory throughput excellent on both also. SNS connection with the atheros 9k card flawless as usual (now). Sound ok in both - one alsa related message in Dmesg in the pristine I don't think I have seen before. Not present in the update. Code: | [ 11.869823] udevd[2908]: controlC0: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 0' failed with exit code 99. |
Mitigation unchanged on this 32b pup and kernel Code: | ▶—— CPU ——◀
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2520M CPU @ 2.50GHz
Socket Designation: Onboard
Manufacturer: Intel(R) Corporation
Voltage: 1.2 V
External Clock: 100 MHz
Min/Max Speed: 800/3200 MHz
Current Speed of Core 0:923 MHz, 1:964 MHz, 2:1564 MHz, 3:1386 MHz
Core Count: 2
Thread Count: 4
64-bit capable: Yes
Frequency governor : powersave
Freq. scaling driver : intel_pstate
itlb_multihit:KVM: Vulnerable
l1tf:Mitigation: PTE Inversion
mds:Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode; SMT vulnerable
meltdown:Vulnerable
spec_store_bypass:Vulnerable
swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
spectre_v2:Mitigation: Full generic retpoline, STIBP: disabled, RSB filling
tsx_async_abort:Not affected |
Running and posting from Slimjet 26.0.3.0, 32b, run-as-spot, loaded from SFS. No page load fails at all since the workaround several posts above was applied.
Cheers,
_________________ Pups currently in kennel Older LxPupSc and X-slacko-4.4 for my users; LxPupSc, LxPupSc64 and upupEF for me. All good pups indeed, and all running savefiles for look'n'feel only. Browsers, etc. solely from SFS.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 3 [37 Posts] |
Goto page: 1, 2, 3 Next |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|