Author |
Message |
foxpup
Joined: 29 Jul 2016 Posts: 1141
|
Posted: Thu 24 Jan 2019, 14:38 Post subject:
|
|
Hi peebee
Do you think this is something for woof CE?
I only have this in your builds.
So maybe it is something special you do in your builds?
If I find it in other builds I will let you know.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Thu 24 Jan 2019, 15:23 Post subject:
|
|
foxpup wrote: | Do you think this is something for woof CE?
So maybe it is something special you do in your builds?
|
It only happens with vertical icons - and my builds are probably the only ones that have vertical icons - but it happens with other builds if you change them to vertical icons ....
so yes it is a Woof-CE issue....
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
foxpup
Joined: 29 Jul 2016 Posts: 1141
|
Posted: Thu 24 Jan 2019, 18:08 Post subject:
|
|
peebee wrote: | It only happens with vertical icons - and my builds are probably the only ones that have vertical icons - but it happens with other builds if you change them to vertical icons ... |
In what other Puppies do you have this behaviour?
I have it with the icons on the bottom or left just the same.
I have tried changing from bottom to left in dpup Stretch from radky and in xenialpup. I have to change the gaps to have proper placement, but no piles.
In xenialpup I have to ask for a refresh/realignment. In Stretch even a simple restart of X makes the change.
Calculations seem to take a little time, more than I would expect.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Fri 25 Jan 2019, 10:10 Post subject:
|
|
foxpup wrote: | In what other Puppies do you have this behaviour? |
I see it in pups made with recent versions of Woof-CE
XenialPup is too old in this regard.
I see it in UPupBB and UPupCC.
I also see it in Norgo's recent update of Slacko 700 RC3 - K4.4.70 PAE
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
foxpup
Joined: 29 Jul 2016 Posts: 1141
|
Posted: Fri 25 Jan 2019, 16:42 Post subject:
|
|
hello peebee
I have it in upupBB also. I haven't installed upupCC yet.
I've tried norgo's new slacko build and I do not have piles there. I chose right on the screenshot, but left is similar.
Could this depend on the screen or some other hardware?
The other recent CE Puppy I have installed is radky's RC4 for dpup Stretch. No piles.
Description |
slacko from norgo with vertical drive icons and grid step coarse |
Filesize |
157.42 KB |
Viewed |
1557 Time(s) |

|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15588 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Sat 26 Jan 2019, 05:25 Post subject:
|
|
Many thanks for putting this together.
Tried the 64bit version. Boot up and configuring and software very familiar.
Never seen Compton before. It basically gives a bit of shadow and transparency and fade in and out of menus. So if you like glitz. However it seems slower when programs fade in and out, so back to fast Puppy for me.
Have added Palemoon browser and devx, Felt very comfortable. Then I ran into problems with Transmission
Could be my IP not happy with me using PirateBay the well known freedom party . . .
_________________ Puppy Raspup 8.2 Final
Puppy Links Page http://www.smokey01.com/bruceb/puppy.html 
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
foxpup
Joined: 29 Jul 2016 Posts: 1141
|
Posted: Sat 26 Jan 2019, 14:52 Post subject:
icon's gap continued Subject description: Spacing cannnot be chosen freely when grid step is not Fine |
|
hello peebee
I just discovered this rather by chance:
There are a few Spacing of ROX icons that work good.
The value for Spacing has to be 48 at least. Good values are 64 and 96.
Decreasing this values by 1 at a time, gives a pile for the drive icons on a place closer and closer to the start of the line. Biggest pile and lowest place for the pile is on 2nd place.
I first discovered this in dpup Stretch RC4 from radky. It is the same in ScPup64.
I will report this now in woof CE.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Thu 31 Jan 2019, 15:39 Post subject:
|
|
32-bit
7c498a4a2841658dcd70045c57a535fe ScPup-19.01+2-uefi-T.iso
{delta update} - must be applied to the base ScPup-19.01+0-uefi-T.iso with md5 checksum 61e86ef2b629c16601de16c608275393
Updates are cumulative - only the most recent needs to be applied.
======================
64 bit
86623855f5c9bfedf590de13ab4a6884 ScPup64-19.01+2-uefi-T.iso
{delta update} - must be applied to the base ScPup64-19.01+0-uefi-T.iso with md5 checksum c6df4031b279cc2c5346b9b75791fa81
Updates are cumulative - only the most recent needs to be applied.
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Sat 16 Feb 2019, 10:38 Post subject:
|
|
32-bit
ed1e20677e9f50d8292d459b13f8f8b8 ScPup-19.01+3-uefi-T.iso
{delta update} - must be applied to the base ScPup-19.01+0-uefi-T.iso with md5 checksum 61e86ef2b629c16601de16c608275393
Updates are cumulative - only the most recent needs to be applied.
BUILD_FROM_WOOF='testing;8a6f7720;2019-02-14 12:32:01 +0800'
Slackware Current Fri Feb 15 21:02:33 UTC 2019
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Last edited by peebee on Sun 17 Feb 2019, 08:32; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wiz57

Joined: 03 Feb 2019 Posts: 99 Location: Chickasha, OK
|
Posted: Sat 16 Feb 2019, 22:54 Post subject:
Testing it now |
|
Hi peebee,
Testing the 32 bit build now! ScPup 19.01 +3, I grabbed the entire new iso,
extracted over contents of the directory I did my frugal install to HD on,
and booted...no problems so far! I did install Palemoon 27.3.0 from PPM,
working pretty well. Hopefully this post will be in the correct place this time!
Thanks,
Wiz57
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Sun 17 Feb 2019, 03:34 Post subject:
Re: Testing it now |
|
Wiz57 wrote: | Hi peebee,
Testing the 32 bit build now! ScPup 19.01 +3, I grabbed the entire new iso,
extracted over contents of the directory I did my frugal install to HD on,
and booted...no problems so far! I did install Palemoon 27.3.0 from PPM,
working pretty well. Hopefully this post will be in the correct place this time!
Thanks,
Wiz57 |
Hi Wiz57
Jolly good...FYI
palemoon-28.3.1 .sfs is available via Internet -> Get Web Browser
or via link in post #1
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Mon 18 Feb 2019, 03:00 Post subject:
|
|
64 bit
e151acda55149968426fcbb89c2c59f1 ScPup64-19.01+3-uefi-T.iso
{delta update} - must be applied to the base ScPup64-19.01+0-uefi-T.iso with md5 checksum c6df4031b279cc2c5346b9b75791fa81
Updates are cumulative - only the most recent needs to be applied.
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ozsouth
Joined: 01 Jan 2010 Posts: 862 Location: S.E Australia
|
Posted: Mon 18 Feb 2019, 06:13 Post subject:
|
|
Peebee, this won't be a problem for anyone else, but in all previous 64 bit Pups, I've been able to run 32bit emelfm (& a few other utils) by adding a few 32 bit libs to /usr/lib , but not this Pup. I get 'emelfm file not found'. Works in LxPupSc64. I thought ScPup64 was LxPupSc64 minus lxde. Is there a 32 bit compat file?
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
peebee

Joined: 21 Sep 2008 Posts: 4391 Location: Worcestershire, UK
|
Posted: Mon 18 Feb 2019, 07:36 Post subject:
|
|
ozsouth wrote: | I thought ScPup64 was LxPupSc64 minus lxde. Is there a 32 bit compat file? |
Hi ozsouth
It is LxPupSc64 minus LXDE.......can you provide any more info on the error report?
There is no "32 bit compat file" - and I wouldn't be sure how to create one without doing some research.....maybe the Slacko64 version might work???
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pet_packages-slacko6414.2/32bit-compat-slacko-14.2.sfs
Cheers
peebee
_________________
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ozsouth
Joined: 01 Jan 2010 Posts: 862 Location: S.E Australia
|
Posted: Mon 18 Feb 2019, 09:13 Post subject:
|
|
Sorry Peebee - I forgot about 32bit libs in /lib. Only checked /usr/lib. Now Fine.
Description |
|
Filesize |
56.66 KB |
Viewed |
1043 Time(s) |

|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|