Mounting WD Easystore (Exfat)?

What works, and doesn't, for you. Be specific, and please include Puppy version.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Aplam

Mounting WD Easystore (Exfat)?

#1 Post by Aplam »

Has anyone succesfully mounted a WD Easystore in Linux (external usb harddrive)? I recently formatted my 2TB easystore as ExFat. When I look at it under drives, it sees it as a 2TB unallocated drive (even though it has files on it). I tried to use Disks (Manjaro) to format it as a FAT32 system, but it just hangs (same result using the cmd.exe in W7 to format it). Under W7, I can format it either NFTS or ExFat. For now, I formatted it ExFat but cannot read or write files to the drive from my Linux distro which forces me to transfer the files to my W7 internal HD and then transfer the files on a reboot from W7. I am hoping to eliminate the final step. I've searched online for advice on mounting the Easystore drive, but so far nothing worked.

User avatar
perdido
Posts: 1528
Joined: Mon 09 Dec 2013, 16:29
Location: ¿Altair IV , Just north of Eeyore Junction.?

#2 Post by perdido »

For linux compatibility use ntfs instead of exfat

Welcome to the forum!

.

peterw
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed 19 Jul 2006, 12:12
Location: UK

NTFS File System on WD Easystore

#3 Post by peterw »

The drives normally come with NTFS and Linux can happily read and write to that. If you are using it purely for Linux then you could use EXT4.

peterw
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed 19 Jul 2006, 12:12
Location: UK

Western Digital External Drive

#4 Post by peterw »

Thought I would add that I have an external USB3, 4 TB Western Digital My Book and just checked that to confirm that it is formatted as NTFS and works well in Linux or in Windows. It is as supplied from WD as I have never formatted it.
With FAT file system there are limitations on file size, number of files and length of file name. Also, I think it will be confused if you have used upper and lower case in file names because it can't tell the difference between them

User avatar
Burn_IT
Posts: 3650
Joined: Sat 12 Aug 2006, 19:25
Location: Tamworth UK

#5 Post by Burn_IT »

Also, I think it will be confused if you have used upper and lower case in file names because it can't tell the difference between them
Not true.
"Just think of it as leaving early to avoid the rush" - T Pratchett

ITSMERSH

#6 Post by ITSMERSH »

Burn_IT wrote:
Also, I think it will be confused if you have used upper and lower case in file names because it can't tell the difference between them
Not true.
Wrong! :lol:

I was sure about this already, though checked it again to make sure I'm not wrong on this.

Created the file Test.txt on fat32 USB flash drive.
Tried to create file test.txt on the fat 32 USB flash drive.

See screenshot. :wink:
Attachments
Screenshot-2019-01-16-14-12-34.jpg
(69.2 KiB) Downloaded 248 times

peterw
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed 19 Jul 2006, 12:12
Location: UK

EXFAT

#7 Post by peterw »

I am wrong about upper and lower case - accepted.
Still trying to understand why Aplam has issues.

foxpup
Posts: 1132
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2016, 21:08

Re: EXFAT

#8 Post by foxpup »

When I look at it under drives, it sees it as a 2TB unallocated drive
How are you looking then? With pmount, or gParted or Rox or ... ?
peterw wrote:Still trying to understand why Aplam has issues.
Maybe trying to mount it in terminal and see if there are error messages?
If the device is sdb, then something like:

Code: Select all

mkdir /mnt/sdb1
mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/sdb1
cd /mnt/sdb1
ls

ITSMERSH

Re: EXFAT

#9 Post by ITSMERSH »

peterw wrote:I am wrong about upper and lower case - accepted.
Still trying to understand why Aplam has issues.
No, you were talking about FAT, so you are not wrong.

See screenshot in my previous post!

peterw
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed 19 Jul 2006, 12:12
Location: UK

Thanks

#10 Post by peterw »

Thanks ITSMERSH. Should have studied you Screenshots more. I thought I was right but memory can be wrong.

Post Reply