Search found 98 matches
- Sun 01 Mar 2009, 14:19
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: Framebuffer rendering instead of X.Org
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1330
Framebuffer rendering instead of X.Org
Since Puppy is targeted at older PC's speed and memory usage weighs heavily. I was wondering if Puppy would benefit from using Linux Framebuffer rendering instead of opting for a full X-Windows installation. This would either result in a much faster desktop (or one that works acceptably on even olde...
- Thu 26 Feb 2009, 10:26
- Forum: Cutting edge
- Topic: I've seen the future of Linux...
- Replies: 55
- Views: 34099
I know they use PythonQT for the GUI library (KDE is built with QT) and they're focused on KDE. Then again, there may be Python GUI libraries for the Window Manager Puppy is using (JWM?). My personal opinion is that shell scripts are often used for things where a full blown programming language, lik...
- Wed 25 Feb 2009, 16:43
- Forum: Cutting edge
- Topic: I've seen the future of Linux...
- Replies: 55
- Views: 34099
I've seen the future of Linux...
and it's called: Pardus Linux What's so special about it? Well, it uses Python instead of shell scripts. The installer, package manager and configuration managers are all written in Python and you can easily extend the system by writting your own graphical or non-graphical Python applets. http://www...
- Fri 09 Jan 2009, 13:22
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: 'Instant On' Puppy
- Replies: 33
- Views: 18929
Re: this is how to do it
first you have to think how old computers/arcade games used to work, they had removable rom chips, The operating system would be preprogrammed on a Rom chip using EPROM Programmer , that basically connected to a pc and the rom chip was programed then removed from the module and placed into a rom so...
- Fri 02 Jan 2009, 19:15
- Forum: Puppy Power
- Topic: Puppy 4.2
- Replies: 111
- Views: 53645
I would like to add: - better (easier to use) harddisk installation (more like Ubuntu where you either pick 'take over the disk' or use GParted first and you set up the installation partiions manually). No other selections should be needed! - a better looking Windows Manager. I really like Xfce, it'...
- Wed 03 Dec 2008, 15:21
- Forum: Users ( For the regulars )
- Topic: What is Woof?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6007
- Thu 20 Nov 2008, 21:13
- Forum: Beginners Help ( Start Here)
- Topic: Can't install Puppy anymore
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2978
There's no reason why an old machine can't copy 10.000 files within an hour or so. Do you use a swap file/partition? (note it's not created automatically in the puppy installer) Don't know really. It says it's gonna take over the entire disk so I reckon it will make a swap partition by itself. Most...
- Mon 17 Nov 2008, 11:07
- Forum: Users ( For the regulars )
- Topic: What is Woof?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6007
What is Woof?
In BarryK's blog I noticed some talk about a new project called Woof. It also seems to involve Python. Is this a new Puppy Linux with Python instead of shell scripting in it, like Pardus Linux? If so, I would like to be involved.
- Mon 17 Nov 2008, 10:39
- Forum: Beginners Help ( Start Here)
- Topic: Can't install Puppy anymore
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2978
It didn't work. After a long long wait, the computer became totally unresponsive (caps lock doesn't light up when I press caps lock) with the CD-ROM light and the hard disk light burning continously. I gave up after about 4 hours. I do remember seeing that the memory usage meter went all the way to ...
- Fri 14 Nov 2008, 21:15
- Forum: Beginners Help ( Start Here)
- Topic: Can't install Puppy anymore
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2978
- Fri 14 Nov 2008, 12:48
- Forum: Beginners Help ( Start Here)
- Topic: Can't install Puppy anymore
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2978
- Thu 13 Nov 2008, 21:52
- Forum: Beginners Help ( Start Here)
- Topic: Can't install Puppy anymore
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2978
Can't install Puppy anymore
I have an old 233Mhz Pentium I (actually it's a Pentium Clone) with 64MB RAM and a 3GB HD. I had an older version of Puppy running on it (2.x) without too much problems but when I tried later version (>=3) the hard disk install didn't work anymore, it seems to work initially but never finishes and t...
- Thu 08 Nov 2007, 16:31
- Forum: Users ( For the regulars )
- Topic: Why no "kill" button in 2.15CE system menu?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3811
Why no "kill" button in 2.15CE system menu?
Is anyone still working on 2.15CE? I love this distro (using it now to write this post) but one thing I miss is a 'kill' button in the system menu. I just had Mozilla Seamonkey hang on me and it's just so much easier to kill with a menu item in the system menu like in 'normal' Puppy releases. Even t...
- Wed 17 Oct 2007, 13:54
- Forum: Puppy Power
- Topic: Xubuntu vs Puppy
- Replies: 39
- Views: 38064
- Sun 14 Oct 2007, 10:17
- Forum: Users ( For the regulars )
- Topic: Why is Puppy's hardware support so good
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1973
Why is Puppy's hardware support so good
Technical question for BarryK and the Puppy developers: why is Puppy's hardware support so good compared to other distro's? I have, for example, Kubuntu running on one of my PC's but the distro is unable to shut down the computer through ACPI, I have to shut it down by hand (there's a power switch o...
- Fri 12 Oct 2007, 17:51
- Forum: Users ( For the regulars )
- Topic: Compact Linux Computer
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3382
- Fri 12 Oct 2007, 17:44
- Forum: Puppy Power
- Topic: Xubuntu vs Puppy
- Replies: 39
- Views: 38064
- Fri 12 Oct 2007, 17:41
- Forum: Users ( For the regulars )
- Topic: How do XFCE, IceWM, JWM memory requirements compare?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3207
How do XFCE, IceWM, JWM memory requirements compare?
Has oneone tested the memory requirements of Puppy + Xfce and compared those to Puppy + IceWM / Puppy + JWM? I think Xfce is very esthetically pleasing with nice controls and window frames and a control panel that's OK (could still be improved, though). If the requirements are similar maybe Xfce sho...
- Fri 12 Oct 2007, 11:24
- Forum: Puppy Power
- Topic: Xubuntu vs Puppy
- Replies: 39
- Views: 38064
Puppy may be smaller in size but the hardware requirements are similar, although Puppy can run on very low spec machines. Xubuntu needs 128MB RAM minimum. I've used both Puppy and Xubuntu and I prefer Puppy for my low-spec machines and Puppy has excellent hardware support (better than Ubuntu) but I ...
- Sat 06 Oct 2007, 10:14
- Forum: Truly off-topic conversations
- Topic: Really tiny web server
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1174