Search found 4 matches
- Sun 14 Apr 2013, 14:22
- Forum: Puppy Derivatives
- Topic: Akita Linux, Beta 16 ISO
- Replies: 1079
- Views: 739568
I made those changes long ago... removed the bashisms from those scripts, and others.. That explains why I immediately noticed that Akita felt much faster. Since you already did the bash tweaks, I'll focus on recompiling the kernel for the wlan module my notebook needs. Then I can really try it out...
- Sun 14 Apr 2013, 13:30
- Forum: Puppy Derivatives
- Topic: Akita Linux, Beta 16 ISO
- Replies: 1079
- Views: 739568
sh _should_ be a link to busybox NOT bash - if it breaks a script, the the script is defective and the #!/bin/sh should be changed to #!/bin/bash I agree, if your going to use busybox, then use it! This gives me something to play with at least. This is my first use of a Linux system that utilizes a...
- Sat 13 Apr 2013, 17:18
- Forum: Puppy Derivatives
- Topic: Akita Linux, Beta 16 ISO
- Replies: 1079
- Views: 739568
speed
The speed problem with Wary 5.5 (not 4.5 as I mis-stated) was due to LANG=en_US.UTF8. After changing it to en_US the speed of Wary is now as fast as Akita. Now to find out why. Note that this issue is only probably noticeable on a super slow cpu.
- Sat 13 Apr 2013, 00:40
- Forum: Puppy Derivatives
- Topic: Akita Linux, Beta 16 ISO
- Replies: 1079
- Views: 739568
Akita vs Wary
I'm testing Wary 4.5 and Akita B14 on a Wyse SX0 366mhz thin client box and both work fairly well, but Akita is much faster while launching apps. For example, rxvt term takes 4-7 seconds in Wary to display the console prompt, whereas Akita only takes 2 seconds. Anyone know why? I've only been runnin...