今日

thank you. Yes, i am aware of the difference, but the solutions posted at the link includes ones for lucid as well

Wow. 30 views and no one can help...depressing

Hello all, I am a fairly new linux user, 2-3 months using various ubuntu versions and backtrack. Have been using Natty on my ASUS eeepc touch T101MT and had to follow the info here https://help.ubuntu.com/community/T101MT to enable touchscreen support within natty. I am more or less a total puppy n0...

If it's going to be used as a rescue OS then it shouldn't really be installed on the hard drive as the hard drive (or its boot mechanism) may have got frazzled. If you install on a flash drive then the machine that is being rescued needs to have the capability of booting from flash. The most usable...

If it's going to be used as a rescue OS then it shouldn't really be installed on the hard drive as the hard drive (or its boot mechanism) may have got frazzled. If you install on a flash drive then the machine that is being rescued needs to have the capability of booting from flash. The most usable...

HAHAHA!!!!

Flash drive install slowest. Hard drive frugal or full install. Full install to hard drive partition is fastest boot. That is if about 5 sec. difference is that big a deal to you. Well, like I said, I mainly use puppy as a rescue os, so the faster I can boot, fix the problem, reboot, continue using...

rcrsn51 wrote:

ntzrmtthihu777 wrote: am looking to boot it directly from the .iso file via the method here (10.04 boots real fast this way)
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1549847
but it won't work right out of the box

Puppy can't be booted this way.

frak, I was afraid of that. Thanks anyway.

Hello all! I am a new linux/puppy/ubuntu user, currently running Precise/Lupu/BT5 triple boot, and am looking to optimize puppy boot time. Currently I have puppy fully installed on partition of my laptop's second hard-drive (a no-no, I know XD) and am looking to boot it directly from the .iso file v...